[8 Femmes (8 Women) ]

Can you imagine a semi-musical version of "Clue" without Tim Curry and in French? Francois Ozon's funny murder mystery is just that.

Everyone's closet is filled with egregiously dirty secrets. These people being French, the stakes are higher than normal. That's one thing about French cinema - their values and morals are on a different plane for the most part than the American sensibility. This is what makes them so freaking interesting.

1 man has been murdered. He was a sugar daddy to some, a husband to others, a devoted father-in-law, but overall a womanizing rich man with a whole slew of problems. Now he's dead and really anyone in the entire room could have done it. With the snowstorm entrapping them, these 8 women have only each other to blame and they're really good at it.

3 out of 5

[Blame it on Fidel ]

What's the difference between group solidarity & sheep behavior? The lead character in Blame it on Fidel, who is only a grade schooler, asks this and other serious questions about different political viewpoints. Who is right? Who is wrong? And finally, who is to blame for the change in her life from a big house with a jardin (garden) to a tiny apartment in which there seems to be a constant flow of bearded visitors.

The intricate subtleties of Blame it on Fidel are so darling that you'll slap yourself at how simple it is to deliver a great message, yet so many filmmakers fail to accomplish this task. There truly is not a second of this film that isn't absolutely filled with intense beauty and creativitiy.

The core of the film is about Anna and we get to see a lot of her life directly from her own eyes. The time period is the 70s in Paris. Her father is Chilean and fighting for the rights of his countrypeople. Her mother is French whose parents are "devout" Catholics. Who is the better person? Who has it all together? Anna struggles to understand this in her impressionable age. It's not at all a preachy movie. It's truly fair & balanced in its representation of both philosophies. It also helps that the film is just filled with amazing acting, set decorations and lighting.

4.5 out of 5

[Juno ]

A really well written comedy, Juno takes the cake for some of the wittier dialogue in films in quite a while. Ellen Page is remarkably awesome. And I don't think Michael Cera is going to get old anytime soon. I don't mean physically old and that he looks like a pre-pubescent boy in every single film he's in, no, not that. I mean that his charming innocence let's him knock up a 16 year old girl in the film and we still feel sorry for the guy. Well, most of that is his character, but didn't he already play this guy in Superbad? Nevermind, this review is about Juno, not Cera the ladykiller.

Juno is about a teenage girl who gets pregnant at the wrong time. She has a loving family that is actually well-functioning. That's one of the most interesting aspects of Juno. In all the madness that occurs, the people aren't horribly perverse or different than any normal group of human beings. Everything that happens does so in a normal setting - making it even more interesting to watch.

A comedy with heart, Juno offers a boatload of witty remarks that you may miss if you let your ears wander for a second.

5 out of 5

[Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street ]

There is no guessing when it comes to Sweeney Todd; the ultimate tragedy. The plot is about vengeance. There's quite a lot of hatred, anger, and blindness in the lead character who once used to be a decent and upright human being.

The musical is dark as dark gets. The film gets so dark that it's hard to take it seriously after a while. There's a lot of blood, a lot of slitting of the throats, a lot of violence and singing in a gloomy London setting.

The acting is all around spectacular but the lack of building suspense leads to a less than exciting twist at the end of the movie. Blah.

2.5 out of 5

[Paris, je t'aime ]

Unpack your bags and cancel your hotel reservations, Paris, je t'aime will give you more of Paris than the city of lights itself. Yes, it's that good! You'll never get a chance to visit all the parts that are highlighted in the film in a short period of time and experience them the way the characters in these different films do. They're all so interesting to watch and they're only available to you for a brief moment in time. 5-6 minutes max.

The list of directors and actors isn't bad either: Steve Buscemi, Natalie Portman, Joel & Ethan Coen, Gerard Depardieu, Wes Craven, Alfonso Cuaron, Ben Gazarra, Nick Nolte, Willem Dafoe, Elijah Wood, Gus Van Sant, Olivier Assayas, and Walter Salles to name a few.

When you have a powerful cast with rich and different styled directors given 2-days to shoot their stories in one district of Paris, disaster or magic can happen. Luckily for this ensemble, it was one of the rarest gems in cinematic accomplishments. It's ridiculous that you never stop thinking "well this story was good, the next one just can't be as good." And yet you're wrong every single time. Each story is different, from a budding love to a divorce to vampires. It's highly imaginative, fun, superbly performed and outstandingly acted. It's an incredible achievement. It's a great film. It's a great series of films. Wow. Please do yourselves a favor and go watch it.


5 out of 5

[King of Kong: A fistful of quarters ]

Finally, after much suspense, I was able to watch "King of Kong: A fistful of quarters", a film that I never really saw the appeal for until watching it. I knew I'd end up liking it because all the people whose taste in movies I trust wanted me to see it.

King of Kong is the story of Steve Wiebi, an extraordinarily nice person who loses his job on the day he signs papers for his new house, that wants to try, for fun, to beat the world's longest running Donkey Kong record.

His opponent is the anti-thesis of Steve. Not only do we not see his opponent play any games on camera live, but we also see him constantly try to get rid of his competitors in the hot sauce business by literally pushing them out of the way. He's the self-proclaimed king of hot sauce, video games, and all things that to the rest of the world wouldn't matter.

The documentary is brilliantly edited specifically towards the beginning of the film when there are a few montages that leave you dazzled. Who knew that a movie about competitive Donkey Kong could be so intriciately interwoven and rich with characters.

3.5 out of 5

[Big Night ]

A very play-like film, Big Night focuses on a pair of brothers who live on a coastal Eastern city trying to make their restaurant a success.

Tony Shalhoub and Stanley Tucci are the brothers who both are supposed to be FOBs (fresh off the boat) yet some of their mannerisms seem to be a mixture of traditional Italian and 2 actors trying to sound more Italian than they are.

Named Primo & Segundo, the brothers differ in a few ways; Segundo wants to pander to the customer and increase business so that their loan doesn't get cut off. Primo is dying to practice the art of cuisine and have an audience that's worthy of his work.

A surprisingly star-studded cast with names like Isabella Rossellini, Marc Anthony, Minnie Driver and Ian Holm, Big Night is an ordinary film with an above-average script and when you have so many of the "right" elements present in the acting and a subject close to everyone's hearts - food - it's bound to be an engaged viewing.

3 out of 5

[Enchanted]

Enchanted's trailers lead you to believe that a whole slew of your favorite Disney characters are coming to life and interacting with New York City's non-fabled stern exterior.

The trailer lied.

Part handdrawn cartoon and majority part live action; Enchanted is a story about Gisele, an about-to-be princess. She's singing and dancing and hanging out with all sorts of animals in a tree branch when she's rescued by the prince she's been waiting for. But there's an evil-stepmother who can't let this union be. She kicks Gisele into the real world and she turns into a woman from a cartoon.

What happens next is a combination of completely ludicrous scenarios and unimagined liberties that lead to a happily ever after. There's song & dance that would make Bollywood hide behind its sheer dupattas in shame. The directing is truly uninspired and the only thing keeping the entire thing together is a burning desire to know when the hell will it end. Well that and Amy Adams being a true sport and doing the best job of acting like a princess who has just eloped the fairy tale world.


2.2 out of 5

[The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford ]

A lot of understated style goes into the creation of a criminal American legend.

But sometimes the pacing of the film along with the excitement of the plot also matters to the mix that create a fine film worth watching.

Brad Pitt is beautifully understated as the so-called "reckless" robber. Robert Ford is equally subtle with his finicky nature played by a creepy Casey Affleck.

There's noodles of style in this picture; the depiction of a wasteland both within and in the environment is clear from the getgo. The film suffers from being part-documentary styled and part narrative. Some may call it an over-priced History channel biopic. Others would say that it's an indulgent treat for the inamoratos of the Wild West and the legend of Jesse James.

A bit on the long side with a wonderful soundtrack, this film is easily missable. But if you want to watch what a creepy traitorous son of a bitch looks like, you'll probably like this film.

2.8 out of 5

[No Country for Old Men ]

It's not as good as you think it will be. It's not as disturbing as the word of mouth lends it to be. Characters like the calculated killer portrayed by Javier Bardem in No Country of Old Men have been present in cinema in the past. For some reason, it's more of the way he looks than anything else that makes him scarier than most.

The base story of the film is about a drug deal gone wrong. It's about a man who finds a massacre in the middle of the desert and tries to use it to his advantage to retire from poverty.

The rest of the film revolves around the fact that we don't live in a world of peace and quiet. That things are really effed up around the country. that the south isn't as harmless as it used to be. And also how beautifully the Coens can use the camera lens to show us these facts.

Tommy Lee Jones probably is the greatest character in the film. He plays a cool as a cucumber sheriff who is no longer surprised by any of the violence around him. He's simply used to the fact that this is now reality. And he's also sure that he's not cut out to face what's coming next.

This is by no means a must-watch film, but it's good to see what a group of professional film industry people voted as the best of their art for 2007.

3 out of 5

[Jodhaa Akbar ]

Jodhaa Akbar is a film about the Mughal Muslim king of India and his Rajput Hindu wife. Traditionally and even today the two religions don't mix, but that they were married in the 1500s when such a union was unthinkable is the perfect indicator of how extraordinary these two people were. And it also explains why in 2008, a film about them is stirring up controversy worldwide.

Jodhaa Bai was the princess of Amer in Rajasthan. Her father decided that in order to prevent enemy forces from attacking, he should team up with the most powerful sultan the country had ever seen, Jallaludin Mohammad (the name Akbar was given to him later.) And so entered Jodhaa into the life of the Mughal empire and became the Queen of India.

Several individuals within the monarchy, however, did not always have the young king's best in mind. And political backstabbing was as common back then as it is now. The raw war scenes and some graphic murders could have done with a little help from epic experts in the West, but for Indian film standards, they surpassed anything prior to them.

The filmmakers do an excellent job of tying up all loose ends before the film is through. The truly entertaining aspects come when the pure goodness, open-mindedness and unconditional love are brought forth as themes. They are primarily embodied in each of the two titular characters and deliver their message poignantly.

Rich and textured sets along with beautiful classic Hindi create a magnetic setting; leaving you absorbed throughout. The historical aspects, say the filmmakers, have been thoroughly researched and only some fluff remains. But for 3 hours and 23 minutes, Jodhaa Akbar is not necessarily a completely faultless film. It's just that with all of the things that work so well for it, you want to forget the minor glitches and the something-t0-be-left-desired editing.

4 out of 5

[Niagra ]

They say a shimmy that Marilyn Monroe did in this movie; which wasn't a shimmy, but simply a walk along the side of Niagra Falls brought her the level of stardom she still holds today. While I wasn't as blown away by the scene as many others who have written about it were, the on-screen seduction of Ms. Monroe was enough to have any young man in 1953 frequent the theaters at least a dozen times. Each time to get more of a glimpse of the idolized beauty.

What I found to be interesting about the film was how quickly it turned into a thriller. It starts out when a couple visits Niagra Falls for their delayed honeymoon. The husband is an ambitious salesman who sounds all the bit "gee whiz golly leave it to beaverish" as you'd expect from a stereotypical 50s motif. He looks the part too with slicked back hair, and somehow an effeminately masculine pitched voice. The word dork comes to mind. And his wife who is extremely plain yet beautiful accompanies him. They can't stay in the cabin they booked because another couple, with the seductive Rose and her post-war (rightfully) jealous husband aren't leaving.

Everything is hunky-dory until the wife spots Rose making out with her lover. Then suspicions arise and crazy stuff starts to happen. The story arc is film noirish in the sense of the deadly beautiful woman controls everything. But it also holds some of the most dynamic shots of Niagra Falls that I've ever seen. A bit of suspense, a bit of fright, and a sense of panic start the movie off and carry it to a satisfying end.

3.5 out of 5

s[There Will Be Blood ]

Scary title for a movie about early American enterprising based on the novel "Oil!" by Upton Sinclair which I have never read but do admit having a slight interest in picking up after watching this brilliant treatment it received on screen by Paul Thomas Anderson and of course Daniel Day Lewis.

Daniel is a hardworking man with only one goal in life; to make tons of money and it's clear since the beginning of the film where he puts his blood, grunt, and sweat into leasing new lands and dig for oil.

Daniel has no family to call his own except the son he's taken in as a kind gesture upon his dead partner. After an accident the loveless Daniel for whom God is just a way to purchase more land becomes insane. Though the insanity comes clearly from the lack of understanding or holding any one person or thing higher than his self. So, ego takes hold of Daniel and the results are probably one of the more interesting character deteriorations to take place on the big screen in quite some time...maybe since Gollum.

The one aspect of the movie that would completely change the way it is received is the music. The music lets us into Daniel's mind even before we see it. The sound of the thunder comes faster, in this anamoly, than the lightning itself, which pretty much is what you see at the end of the film. There has not been a more accurate soundtrack to a film in since who knows when. It's absolutely perfect and composed with each character and plot step in mind.

Absolutely worth watching.

4.5 out of 5

[Shopgirl]

Don't be fooled by the deceptively simple title; Shopgirl is an extraordinary film about a strange love triangle. Well, there's the triangle part which is ordinary, but the interesting aspects of the film come into play when we get to meet these oddball subtle characters. The film is based on Steve Martin's novella of the same name.

At first glance, Shopgirl seems like it's going to be a typical romantic comedy with cheesy stereotypical setting. The film is all about a girl and whether she will choose a dopey yet objectifying wannabe rocker or a super-wealthy older man with equal parts womanizer & dope attached to his forehead.

Drifting away into this extraordinary life of an ordinary shopgirl, it makes you realize that time passes by so quickly and we have so little time to make decisions. Often, the wrong ones could lead to a lifetime of needless pain.

At the most unexpected moments, the film's direction takes us into glimpses of fantasy. Whether it's a shot transitioning from a rooftop window into the starry sky or the exaggerated beauty of Seattle's skyline, Shopgirl offers a rich sensibility along with pleasant viewing.

3.5 out of 5

[Helvetica]

Helvetica is exactly what you think it is, an assembly of interviews with type designers and some others talking about the highly used and highly influential font Helvetica. The creator of the font that this Reviews page is written in, Georgia, is also featured in the film.

Spacing, serif or sans-serif, the differentiation between each letter in the type. All of these are influential figures in how the font is taken. Helvetica is known for having the Howard Roark like effect in the design world. After coming from an age of fonts where fancy curves and decorations were the norm, Helvetica brought simplicity and stunning, nearly scientific fonts to the forefront.

It's very well made and full of delicious fonts to stare at. I wanted to create my own after I was finished watching it. And it also reminded me of once how I had, in fact, created a font in art class in freshman year of high school.

4 out of 5

[Superbad]

Superbad is funnier than Knocked Up. You're not supposed to compare films, but since they're made by the same writers, it should be noted that if you found Knocked Up to be funny, you're going to need hospitalization after the vulgar yet witty humor of Superbad.

The story is nothing new; it's the American Pie genre of films. The kids all have the same goal but a new set of obstacles. Some new faces and a lot of hilarious quips with absolutely genius writing, Superbad is where it's at.

McLovin played by Christopher Mintz-Plasse is probably one of the greatest nerdy characters in recent comedic film history. It's played so well that you'll want to re-watch the film just to see some of his dialogue delivery and style.

What more can be said about Superbad that you probably haven't already heard from your friends? It's funny as hell.

4 out of 5

[The Darjeeling Limited]

The first clue to the inauthencity of The Darjeeling Limited is depicted clearly in its first scene; a turban-wearing cab driver in India. Sure, it's possible to have a cabbie in India that wears a turban, but there are also hundreds of thousands that do not wear one. But Wes Anderson has written a lot of the script in Paris along with his buddies and it seems that stereotypes have overcome research in that particular sense.

Waris Ahluwalia who is a New Yorker and has no Indian accent, but is seen wearing a turban in the film, plays the role of the ticket collector. The ticket collector has a muted American accent - and he is supposed to be authentically "Indian."

There are moments like the ones above throughout The Darjeeling Limited, it gives no clue as to the country's actual ways, but simply utilizes it as another pretty backdrop to tell the story of 3 brothers who have issues with one another and issues in their own relationships.

The dialogue has a charming innocence and sense of humor to it and the acting is wonderful. Even the music is brilliant, all of the music in the movie except a few songs are from old Merchant Ivory films.

If it weren't for the lack of research on the parts of the filmmakers, Darjeeling could have been a monumental success. Here it made for a nice airplane ride watch.

2.7 out of 5

[Atonement]

A very frank peek into the lives of a few aristocrats, their friends, their servants, and their affairs. A non-kosher film of sorts, Atonement exhilirates you with the simplest of camera movements and heart thumping musical score. A delivery that is extremely powerful.

What happens when someone takes the word of one person against another? What happens when this one person is a 13 year old girl and the accused is a young man in his 20s. What happens when the crime he is accused of is so gruesome that it would make anyone in his position tainted forever regardless of the truth.

A wonderful cast with extremely sharp performances and a compelling story based on the novel.

Quite beautiful in all its melancholy and drama.

4.5 out of 5

[The Counterfeiters ]

A slick Jewish counterfeiter must choose between his life and morals. Should he make mock money for the Nazis while imprisoned and knowing fully-well that the money would go to further carry out the Holocaust? Or should he fight and possibly die in revolt?

That is exactly what's at the center of the Counterfeiters, a very intense and true look at the true story of a counterfeiter who did in fact find him in the situation. It's not exactly an edge-of-your seat thriller, but the tension is definitely present and the mood is a bitter cold one throughout.

Not exactly a "fun" watch, but definitely worth checking out if available.

3 out of 5

[Once ]

Great music is at the center of this European romance flick. A street-guitar player meets an anxious and cute piano player. Both of them are a bit strapped for cash. The guitar hero is an aspiring artist. The piano player just wants love. One problem: they're both infatuated or recalling their past relationships. While being extremely fond of one another they find it difficult to carry forward anything (for the most part) while still "in love" with their past.

An extremely pleasant soundtrack but not so engaging of a film to watch.

2.9 out of 5

[Odette Toulemonde ]

Finally, a movie about happiness and one that glorifies true happiness instead of material happiness! Sure there's that usual bit about love, but it's played at differently.

Odette Toulemonde is an ordinary woman who has an extraordinarily positive way to look at life. She experiences surreal elevation when going about her average day. This is depicted through episodic floating in the film. The music is wonderful and Odette can't resist a good tune to shake her toosh too. Excruciatingly cute and superbly acted, Odette Toulemonde is just wonderful.

The reason behind her happiness, however, is an author of a self-help series. And he's in trouble. So will he lose the happiness he brought within Odette? Will he go to the point of severe depression or will he lift out of it? And what of this character named Jesus who looks like Jesus and seems to reflect Odette's every mood?

Damn clever.

4.5 out of 5

[The Simpsons Movie ]

There is hardcore nudity in this film. I won't reveal the source nor any further details, you'll just have to find out for yourself. The Simpsons have always been funny, sarcastic, stereotype-driven, and a no-holds barred group of writers who know how to make fun of everything including themselves and the company that gives them money to stay on-air and in theaters. The movie does not differ from the show. There are cinematic animation elements which add to the glory of the movie, but essentially it's one long satisfying episode.

4 out of 5

[I For India ]

This documentary includes footage and audio taken by an Indian immigrant in the 1930s through the present. It is compelling yet extremely personal. The film is more like a diary of events to occur in the Suri family of northern India.

Satya Suri moves to London at a young age to pursue a medical career, his life's dream. A wife follows along with 3 daughters. His parents and family members wnat him to return home while he is confused as to where he should go. Due to the lack of a proper phone system during the time, Suri purchases a reel-to-reel audio machine and video recorder one for his home in London and the other he sends to his family in India. The two exchange personal, heartfelt, extremely moving notes to one another.

Their daughter has put this documentary together that is sure to let you know the most detailed struggles faced by immigrants to the U.K. Please watch it if you get a chance.

4.5 out of 5

[Youth Without Youth ]

Director Francis Ford Coppola's first film since the Rainmaker is triumphant. It is possibly one of the greatest American films to cover a broad scope of philosophies with success.

Youth is a story about a man who experiences a supernatural phenomenon that renders time and physics meaningless. No rules apply any longer and the mystery unveils slowly but not without a bit of didacticism.

The viewpoint of Coppola may be influenced by the novelist's own bias but since I have not read the book, I'm uncertain. But there is a tremendous freedom inherent within the deeper philosophies of the film's themes and it seems a bit flawed to include a "direction" within a topic that generally is steered by the interpreter. Nevertheless, Coppola depicts some extremely internal and hard-to-create experiences onto film. It is a distinctive film, one that should be watched by any person who never even wants to consider delving into spirituality or philosophy on their own.

The content within the film can be reveleational to the viewer if marinated upon. Youth Without Youth is not just a movie, it's a lifetime's worth of thoughts poured onto screen. Youth has the potential to drive within a soul-searching journey for every individual that experiences it.

5 out of 5

[Shi gan (korean title) / Time ]

Director Ki-Duk Kim's Time is a thought provoking, haunting, and insanely disturbing movie. A woman thinks that her boyfriend will grow tired of her face. So what would any disturbed and self-deprecating woman do? Get a new face, of course!

The inherent tragedy of the film grows out of a really messed up self-perception, wrong thought, and just a fatally aesthetic viewpoint.

Much like other Ki-Duk Kim's films, this one has a simple premise, a light dialogue and heavy on the metaphorical microcosms of the overall theme of the film.

Quite a unique experience as with any of Kim's films.

3.7 out of 5

[Reign Over Me ]

Though overall a drama, Reign Over Me makes you laugh at the oddest times. And it's nice to laugh to get away from the overall morose atmosphere of the movie. Reign is filled with comfortable visuals to an uncomfortable center within the lead character.

From scooter rides through New York City's iconic downtown and uptown neighborhoods to exquisite apartments and dental offices, Reign covers the different aspects of life of Charlie Fineman, who has lost his family to 9/11.

Alan Johnson, a practicing successful dentist with less problems and an equally beautiful family, runs into Charlie on the streets. He's immediately drawn into old stories and the old world that he shared with Charlie as college roomies.

Everyone tries to help Charlie, including Alan, but will he accept the help of all these people? Or will he continue to live in misery? I guess you can try to find out, it's not that bad of a movie, but it's not amazingly great either.

2.7 out of 5

[The Birds ]

Alfred Hitchcock's classic film is unusual in many ways. There is a ton of suspense in the movie but the viewer is not completely satisfied at the ending. We all know that the master (as we like to refer to Mr. Hitchcock) is a huge fan of giving the audience more information and control than he does the characters. But this is just way too much control and you'll know what I mean if you watch the movie.

After a chance encounter at a bird shop in San Francisco, Melanie Daniels and Mitch Brenner are bound to become a curious couple. They develop an intrigue and game of sarcastic wit and banter that leads to a predictable romantic relationship. This all starts when Daniels decides she's going to find Mitch and buy him a pair of lovebirds.

Characters may not have control in Mr. Hitchcock's films, but they sure do have epersonality. Everyone from the patrons at the local restaurant to the General Store's clerk in this film have something interesting to contribute. You'll find each and every person important and fascinating in their own ways before the film is over. And you'll also inevitably wonder if they're responsible for the birds going all violent on the citizens. The sound design is impeccable in this film and contributes to much of the suspense and terror. As is the lack of a musical soundtrack.

Didn't Hitchcock ever just be normal? (As in, all his movies have something unique and contribute a vast deal to filmmaking as a burgeoning and expansive art form.)

3.3 out of 5

[The Namesake ]

Irfan Khan steals the show in this Mira Nair adaptation of the popular novel by Jhumpa Lahiri.

Khan portrays Ashoke Ganguli, a young man living in Calcutta who decides to leave his motherland of India for colder pastures in New York City. The film resonates very closely with Indian immigrants and their children who arrived in the States in the 70s. In fact, I happen to know many people who have watched the film and can't help but reminisce about their own lives.

The film is big on events and small on insights. While a lot of activity happens as it does in any person's life, there are no real indicators as to the why. Sure, kids growing up in NYC will be different than ones in India. But, what's the point of showing all this stuff if you're not going to make things connect?

The film was advertised as being a journey into the lead character's life; Gogol, and why he got the name he did. But this does not even come close to the plot of the actual film. Kal Penn, who is a favorite of Truepictures Reviews fails to portray any kind of genuine acting in the film. It's more like he's playing the role as himself but with longer hair. Truly a letdown in that sense.

Irfan Khan and Tabu (Ashima Ganguli) are the only 2 people on camera that actually are entertaining to watch as they are completely immersed in their characters and offer the little substance contained within this otherwise empty movie.

2.5 out of 5

[Knocked Up ]

Wow, what an original piece of freaking comedy film. The vulgarity is supposed to be based in reality, but even college kids on acid don't act as retarded as these guys do. At least not when they're sober. And in this movie, they rarely are sober, so it makes sense.

So, check it, the fat guy gets with the really hot blonde who actually hosts her own show on the E! Network. They get drunk and miscommunicate seriously about protection. And what happens next? Well, they try to see if it would work between them so that they could take care of the baby together.

The jokes in the film are solid. They're just really good. I mean they will make you laugh. What the hell else could you ask for? Seriously, believe the hype.

3.7 out of 5

[Live Free or Die Hard ]

Helicopters being brought down by cars, F37 airplanes going head on with 18-wheelers and Maggie Q flying down an elevator shaft are some of the stunts you will see in Live Free or Die Hard, the latest installment in the Bruce Willis action series of films. Without watching the movie, you already know what is going to happen. You know that there inevitably be a scene where the police arrive a little too late and people need serious medical attention. But despite the predictability of the plot, the action sequences and cheesy dialogue (complemented very nicely by Bruce Willis' bald head) make for an entertaining film.

Detective John McClane is back and though he's missing some of the charm from the previous films, he's still up for a rocking good time. The dramatic moments in the film are laughable compared with the intensity of the past ones. But the action sequences remain an extremely great treat. The best comedic punches are delivered by Justin Long and McClane seems to have reduced his vocabulary after years of pain taken to his head.

What else can be said about a Die Hard movie? If you like action and Bruce Willis, you're going to love this freaking movie.

3 out of 5

[Sophie Scholl: The Final Days ]

Really beautiful cinematography adds a magnanimous importance to Sophie Scholl along with poignant music.

There is a group of young students who don't believe that Hitler is the answer for Germany. They carefully want to distribute messages of peace using peaceful means and want Germany to pull out of World War 2. But obviously the Nazis want to make an example out of these youngsters and not let them have freedom.

There isn't much that goes on during the film, no over-the-top action sequences, no love stories, nothing glamorous at all, in fact. Maybe that's why the film is so effective. It's the story of a person that can easily just be any college aged student you currently know. The only difference is that these students had the nerve to rise against their own government and speak up about injustices that were being done to people they didn't know.

The film's most intense moments is towards the beginning when the revolutionaries are engaging in their peaceful mode of action. It is quite well-lived on screen.

3 out of 5

[Michael Clayton ]

A nail biting drama about a man who fixes problems; a janitor of sorts, Michael Clayton allows George Clooney to use his charm and model suit stature to shine. Nothing is an issue for Clayton to fix and in a building filled with lawyers who are all experts in litigation it is Michael's unique ability to solve the unplaceable problems that make him such a secure asset for the firm he works with.

When a lawyer who has been working on one of the largest cases for the firm loses his faith and cool, it's up to Clayton to solve the problem.

The film shifts time and it adds to the matter-of-factly production design. Nothing over the top, no special effects, just dialogue and a simple, "what's going to happen next?" sense make this a classic film. It's all about the movie and not all the independent parts. All gathered to tell a compelling story with a bit of intrigue and entertainment.

3.5 out of 5

[Transformers ]

As all Michael Bay movies tend to do, this one also lacks in dramatic power. There is literally a dense cloud of nothing when it comes to creating a coherent sense of plot. There are many characters and very little time to mold them into meaningful people.

The special effects rock, for what it's worth. But then it's just silly to have Megatron and all those dudes have emotional moments. And the dialogue is puke-worthy. Don't waste your time on it unless you used to love the cartoon as a kid and want to see those great alien robots come to life.

2 out of 5

[Lust, Caution ]

Secrets held within cause uncertainties and no sense of direction for a person. When you take a look at the characters within Lust, Caution, a secret lies underneath all their facades. But along with this lies a deeper desire to do something, to make a difference, to actually live their lives.

A group of college students are part of the resistance movement during the Japanese occupation of China. As their mission, they decide that their lives are not going to be fulfilled until they kill a traitor. Essentially a game is begun to assassinate one of the leading traitors of the country and Ang Lee's leading man in Lust, Caution.

What Lust, Caution offers is an invigoratingly cursory look at the lives of all these people with seemingly meaningless lives. While there are "larger problems" looming, the way they interact with them becomes the center of it all. Primarily through the dominating affair that occurs between the two very opposing partners: the young naive actress turned submissive love-spy vs. the tyrannical, blood-thirsty traitor.

Lust, Caution features an excellent soundtrack, lacking visuals but a natural feeling setting nonetheless. The NC-17 rating is unwarranted because if anyone has watched a show on HBO recently, it crosses more lines than this movie does as far as the sexually explicit scenes. But it's definitely not a family-friendly film.

Does the sex work as a metaphor? Kind of. Does the intensity of feelings and nerves take over the audience as they wonder, "what will she do?" Yes. Is the movie anything noteworthy? It's remarkably subtle when it wants to be, even though some scenes do carry it over the top. I'd say go watch it.

3.2 out of 5

[The Unbearable Lightness of Being ]

Tomas is a charming doctor who seduces every girl in sight. And every girl accepts his mischevious ways. That's just the way he does things, surgery by day and sex by day (after surgery), night and pretty much all the time.

He is a man who cannot be controlled. His long time lover Sabina is also the same way. She's an artist who works primarily with glass and has an obsession with sex, and some would say Tomas. But isn't it funny how things change when a third, more conservative person is introduced into the lives of two very promiscuous people?

And the third person in this case of Tomas and Sabina is Tereza. She is wooed by Tomas while he's away doing surgery. She's a lonely bartender who lives with her mother and shows up on Tomas' doorstep a few days after his visit. Then the fun begins; she is not erotic, not seductive, but just innocent, pure, beautiful and loving.

Into this mix now falls a new aspect; Soviet socialists. They want to take over Prague (the setting of the film) and then begins a tremendous revolution within the natives. Tereza takes amazing photographs of the terrorism that takes place. Tomas supports her and then they carry on.

The visuals of the film are engrossing, the music is perfect, the nudity is plentiful, the sex is indulgent and the acting is superb. Though people who read the book would probably find this too short to be satisfying.

3 out of 5

[Starting Out in the Evening ]

Leonard Schiller (Frank Langella) is an author at work on most likely his final novel. Heather Wolfe (Lauren Ambrose) is a grad student at Brown who is working on her thesis - Schiller.

This film starts out extremely slowly and it should be mentioned that it is based on a novel, and sometimes it feels as if this is the most reading I've done on screen in quite a while. It even features other authors within the film, reading out excerpts, that Leonard & Heather go to watch. It's all very meta.

There is a wide age gap between Heather and her subject who seems to only invite Heather's queries once he realizes that without her, his final novel might not get published. Though he has written worthwhile work and is considered a scholar, he is no longer relevant to the publishing world today.

Much of the film surprises me because it seems hackneyed and tried. But there is a strong sense of character in the film which causes it to live. The irony is that Leonard's last 2 books have not hit the proper chord with the audience; specifically Heather, because the characters simply do nothing.

Much of "Evening" are vacant shots of pretty rooftops, a lonesome apartment with some handsome furniture, and repetitive shots of New York City's Upper West Side. There is a lack of action, a lack of movement, and instead of adding an element of connection, it sometimes becomes the cause of yawns. The other reason it suffers is because this is a film about a book and there is a ton of dialogue and not enough action. The height of action in the film takes place when voices are raised and some manner of catharsis is shown. But to get to that point is difficult for the characters to reach. It is understandable why Andrew Wagner has directed the film in the way he has, but even the sexual tension is sometimes as undesired as the dull production design (read: tea cups).

But it is worth noting that Frank Langella does a tremendous job of displaying the mild mannered Schiller. There is truth in his performance which makes it extremely endearing. And it actually is good enough to hold your attention.

2.8 out of 5

[The Third Man ]

What would you do if your friend called you to Vienna and you went, but upon arrival you found out that he was dead? What would you do if you saw him being buried with the priest reading the benediction? I don't know about you, but I'd freak. It would be very odd. The last thing I would do is stick around and investigate the death. But that wouldn't make for a very interesting movie.

The Third Man starts with Holly Martins coming into town to visit his friend Harry Lime (Orson Welles) only to find him being buried. But from the get go Holly suspects that the death is a murder and not just a car accident like everyone says. And since everyone is speaking 1 of 4 languages that were prominent at the time in Vienna, a lot of confusion is accentuated by a lot of noise.

Turns out that these elements make for a very entertaining film noir mystery. Many characters come into play in the film and each adds their own unique twist to the bigger picture about the nature of morality, duty, and a confusing time after war.

3.5 out of 5

[Breach ]

The FBI is front & center in this spy drama. There is an agent lurking within the Bureau who is said to be a sexual deviant. Becaus of this there is a tail put on him. But the trailers make it obvious that the criminal acts committed go far beyond deviance.

Chris Cooper is the culprit and Ryan Philippe is the hired gun to spy on the spy. Overall, the film is composed very nicely. The atmosphere of the life of an informant is captured very nicely and there is just the right amount of human drama mixed in with psychological games of spying.

The music is amazing and it is shocking that the film is based on a true story. . . considering the setting is in 2001.

3.5 out of 5

[Imagine: John Lennon ]

A documentary that features some of the greatest music of our time is definitely an enticing entity. All your life, if you are born in the 80s or after, you hear about John Lennon, you listen to the Beatles, and you hear about peace and a fan base of millions that surpasses the attention received by Jesus.

Though it's admirable that the filmmaker does not try to define John Lennon in any particular manner, maybe it is because of this fact that it also fails to reach the depths of our emotional buckets. We see his career as a Beatle, get a glimpse into his childhood, and then learn a lot about the "advertising for peace*" campaigns he starts. But it all fails to come to a definitive conclusion. We aren't clearly told one way or another who John Lennon was. This documentary merely takes us to all the different aspects of the man's life and we're the last ones to judge.

With over 100 hours of interview footage that the filmmakers had for this film, I just keep wondering why they picked the scenes they did. It is quite interesting and melodious overall, but it's also great fun to watch the girls screaming their heads off when they show clips of the Beatles.

3.5 out of 5
*not the actual campaign

[TMNT ]

Great movie if you like watching computer animated characters doing fun poses and tricks. Not a good movie if you like plot, good dialogue, style, and substance.

The only remnants of Shredder in this CGI film are in the form of a drawing that you see at the beginning. Supposedly the turtles have vanquished their nemesis and in this movie, must instead battle it out against monsters and alien stone creatures come to life.

Human characters such as April O'Neill look odd in CG while the turtles look cool. There is a lot of work done on the animation itself and it shows, but whatever cool points one gets are not in the style department but merely the generation of these turtles. There's nothing much to the movie except a yawn worthy plot and background visual noise to keep yourself occupied while handling chores around the house.

2 out of 5

[The Lives of Others ]

1984 Berlin was not chosen randomly for the time of the events in The Lives of Others.

A time when the wall still stood very much erect and very much a dividing force between two mindsets. We are in East Berlin where socialists do not tolerate revolutionary minds. Even artists and directors are put behind the bars or subjected to blanketed but subtle shutouts. Shut out from work, from society, from being anything but pathetic pieces of flesh; living aimlessly.

The main character is a lonesome man who happens to be an excellent interrogator. His friend from college is now working for the new Socialist party and needs help in weeding out the questionable characters and keeping them out of business and out of the general public.

And so begins the mission of invasion of privacy. A fine plot to tap into the lives of others is orchestrated by the very quiet, very business-like, Wiesler. He has no private life and does not hold much sacred. The film unravels beautifully as we are witness to the intricacy and complete disregard for privacy shown in the film. The entire film is scored beautifully and all the action takes place in a very non-stylized but yet captivating manner. The story just moves forward easily and leaves you very satisfied by the end.

4.5 out of 5

[Ratatouille ]

Paris looks beautiful in movies; even when they're computer generated. Rats are hard to make to look cute, but they somehow manage to pull it off in Ratatouille. Even when there are scores of them.

Ratatouille is a film about food, freedom of choice, and the daring sense to chase after your dream, no matter who or even what you are. Remy, a rat, has great taste in food. He won't eat garbage like his father and brother who will eat anything. His strongly developed senses of taste and smell make him a different sort of rat. He's in love with Gusteau; a popular chef with a 5-star restaurant in Paris with one motto: "Anyone can cook."

Remy takes this as inspiration and then begins a series of fortunate events that sets him on course to guiding a human to do his bidding. Along the way we see other rodent-like villains trying to plot the demise of Gusteau's restaurant and his good name by hocking frozen food products.

A very refreshingly different story in which fantasy does not really exist. I found it extremely wonderful that the rat was not able to speak to the human with words but just signals. While one would have to take leaps of faith at other parts in the film, I found that bit of realism to help in the creative process of the content of the movie to really unfold in a unique manner.

3.3 out of 5

[The Lady Vanishes ]

1938 Hitchcock is not at his perfection prime, but he's getting close at this point. The story involves a lady, obviously, who suddenly disappears while traveling on a train. And only one woman aboard thinks that this woman was in fact on the train with her. The rest of them simply feign memory loss or do they? Has the woman who claims to have seen the lady a nutcase? Well it shouldn't seem so...but then again, in Hitchcock's films things aren't always as they seem.

There is plenty of wit and womanizing going on throughout the film as is characteristic of the great auteur. But Hitch himself does not show up in the film. That's a habit he picked up later on.

And at 97 minutes long, this one is just the right amount to make you feel as if you've entered the train and are trying to piece together the puzzle yourself. And it's not the greatest reward, but it is quite a satisfactory journey.

3.5 out of 5

[Death at a Funeral ]

This British comedy by Frank Oz is filled with tiny ideas and jokes expanded into the mainframe. The film is not about an overall moral, the only consistent theme is physical comedy carried out in multiple ways during a funeral.

The main character has just lost his father. Though he lives at home, he is not his mother's favorite son. His wife keeps telling him to move out of the house and make sure he does not miss a deposit to a new apartment they want to purchase.

His brother is an expatriate who happens to write great novels but does not want to spend too much time (or money) on the family. Then there are a handful of colorful characters who get hold of some hallucinogens by happenstance. And it is funny. Laugh out loud funny, sometimes extremely gross and funny.

3 out of 5

[Strangers on a Train ]

Not Alfred Hitchcock's best film, but Strangers in a train is good at pulling on your curiosity. What will happen next? How will it all end? Why is the dialogue in older movies so much better than dialogue in current films? My sister said that last one, but only because I had asked her the same after watching "All About Eve."

So a famous non-professional tennis player runs into a lunatic on the train who wants to off his father. Somehow the lunatic talks into conversation on swapping murders. As in, he would kill the tennis player's wife so that he can marry the new woman he's into (a senator's daughter). Madness ensues.

A major issue of this movie is that it's just not that mysterious, it's curiosity that makes you finish it, but you're not curious because you're engaged. You're curious because you want to see how all these loose ends tie up and well, you can get closure and finally stop the damn thing. Some interesting choices in shots, but overall not Hitchcock's best film.

2.7 out of 5

[Hot Fuzz ]

While great production value makes this film look absolutely wonderful, the comedy isn't as hard-hitting as it could be.

The story goes like so: a sargeant moves from the London beat to the "generic village" beat. Here he encounters village life and cops that are not really all about the work at all. They drink during the day, eat pastries for breakfast and take early lunches. The police force is filled with incompetent bastards.

Then something happens which alerts the new officer in town that things aren't as they seem. A lot of accidents start occuring and well some comedy ensues. It really isn't that funny, it just is good with setting up some really funny situations.

2 out of 5

[Battling Butler ]

This silent film was interesting, funny, and gave me an insight into the world of filmmaking before dialogue was developed. Richard Linklater could never make a movie in the same vain as Buster Keaton or any of the silent film greats.

There were two Keaton films on 1 DVD, a double-feature, if you will. The main event was Battling Butler, a film about a very well-off kid whose father thinks he's been spoiled too much. And how does a father in the 1920s turn his son into a man? Well he sends him off in the jungle with a butler and a camp full of life's luxuries including a hot water bath, the finest silver, and tuxedos to wear.

While in the forest, Alfred Butler finds a woman and falls for her but her burly father and brother think Mr. Butler is too weak. So what next but a case of mixed up identities, lies, hilarity and a very well told film. Battling Butler is great because of the style involved and how well it tells a story. While there are great moments of silent comedy; primarily Butler succeeds because it touches your heart and you grow fond of the characters in the film.

3.5 out of 5

[The Bourne Ultimatum ]

Jason Bourne is still searching for answers. And this time he's determined to find them with very little standing in the way of his getting to his goal. Well, that's a lie, there are a ton of reasons that he can't get to the information, but we watch in anticipation as he tries like hell.

The third installment in this exciting series about Jason Bourne; a programmed robot ninja assassin of sorts is definitely one of the more thrilling hits of the summer. It is not only action packed with new ass-kicking sequences, but just as clever as the first one in the series.

A lot of intelligence, charm, speedy and effective camera work also plays a huge role in the thrill ride that Bourne creates. There is hardly a moment to breathe as you are whisked away to several major cities around the globe in search for answers. You'll be impressed by the slickness of the movie until the "Directed by" credit.

4 out of 5

[300 ]

A bit of the old ultra-violence; a bit of the old ultra mesh of recycled movie themes a la Braveheart & Gladiator. A bit of the same style that Frank Miller grants all his projects and a bit of idiocy.

Don't waste your money on this movie that has all its glorification in violence and little respect for valuable thought. They make the villains the ones who want to discuss the problem and the heroes that want to only kill and "defend." The matter of fact is that if it weren't for the egotistical king of Sparta; the war would have never begun. Sound familiar?

But I don't think many people watch the movie in this sense. They just see the eye-candy and say "ooo" and "aaaah." Well that is why we're saying, this movie sucks. Well the parts that do not suck are the special effects and the Frank Miller style.

1.8 out of 5

[Au Revoir Les Enfants ]

Before Schindler's List & Life is Beautiful, there was Louis Malle's touching Au Revoir Les Enfants. As Jews began to be persecuted throughout Europe, including France, the infiltration of their hate spread through to most parts. Except a tiny village school in France.

A kid who dislikes going away to school immensely forges an initially turbulent friendship with a Jewish boy. He does not know what Jews are nor does he know why they're hated. But as they read Arabian nights together, run away from bullies, and go out to dinner, they begin learning how they're not much different from one another.

The snowy photography and horseplay about young boys also is sprinkled throughout the film. There are definitely moments where we are in fear for what's coming next and what the fate of the young boys will be. A tale of growing up, a small chunk of life is taken from these boys' lives and put onto screen for us, Au Revoir Les Enfants tries also to be a well-knit morality tale. Definitely entertaining.

4 out of 5

[Tree ]

Michael R Steinbeck's short film is about a tree with mysterious powers. It seems that folks who sit underneath the tree see visions. What sorts of visions? Well you'd have to watch the film to figure that out now wouldn't you? Luckily the film is playing some film festivals across the country; stay tuned to their Website for more information on that.

A family moves into a new home in a rural part of the country. The wife's father has passed away and now the couple with their young daughter have taken over the family farm and are living in the house near the tree. Suddenly all of the family members, but particularly the father start seeing visions that are not always pleasant.

Tree is shot beautifully and has some extremely memorable images that will implant (pun intended) themselves in your head indefinitely. But like many independent films the acting could always be better. If some of the background actors in the film did more than stand around and look like background actors; it would have really added to the otherwise genuine film.

2.9 out of 5

[Volver ]

Seemingly normal; Volver is anything but an ordinary movie. It's by far one of the most creative films to come out in recent memory. The film starts out with women cleaning out their headstones at a cemetery. These older and some random younger women are all about keeping their grave sites clean for when they die.

Deceptively simple as it is, the film contains many layers which make it an enjoyable experience. There is great usage of color and selection of shots to portray the warmth. Volver revolves around the poor life of Penelope Cruz' lead character who is smart, sexy, and very loving. Her sister & daughter travel together mostly always and have a bond that's wonderful to experience.

The music is laid out perfectly to the picturesque Spanish countryside. The acting is superb and I don't think anyone in their right mind will doubt the capabilities of Almodovar. An excellent film.

4.5 out of 5

[Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix ]

David Yates' take on the fifth Harry Potter novel is quite similar and one step upgraded than the Goblet of Fire. Rich in special effects as always, this Potter film is action packed and had a momentous task of putting all the details of the novel onto screen.

First off, if you've read the books, you know that the biggest villain or representative of evil was the new professor of the Dark Arts; Dolores Umbridge. She is portrayed as an overtly sweet, tart, bitter, vile, deceiving, cruel woman. The complexity of her character and evil is very thorough in the book and the film has done an excellent job of capturing her decrepit essence.

While on the topics of new characters; Luna Lovegood is a show stealer. While it's impossible to put in all the nuances of the novel into a movie; Luna's character is played very well on screen and we definitely wish there was more of her involved in the film.

Harry is now in his fifth year and the movie starts out with everyone doubting the truth about how Cedric Diggory died. Many feel that Potter is a Plotter and he was the reason the other Gryffindor student was murdered in the maze from the Tri-Wizard tournament. Obviously this is not the case, and Harry has to put up with suspecting friends, recurring nightmares with Lord Voldemort, and hormonal upstart - as far as matters with Cho Chang are concerned. The film takes us through another great year and yet another huge death with great ease. Very entertaining.

3.5 out of 5

[Little Children ]

Adults use children as an excuse to have extramarital affairs. But then children are powerful too and somehow the role children play in the lives of adults is examined in this lameish movie.

If you've seen one recent movie about affairs, you've seen them all. At least that's what it seems like. A lot of the same type of stuff happens in the relationships of couples in this as it does in most movies and two people really start falling for one another.

There is a strange element of a convicted sex felon and the relationship he has with his mother. Besides this however the movie is unexciting.

2 out of 5

[Ocean's 13 ]

It's fun to watch charismatic people on camera, it truly is. If this movie were cast with any others, it would go into the 99 cent bin at your local Wal-mart in about 1 month.

Ocean's 13 lacks the cunning of the previous two films. The con is cool but not as cool as in the previous 2. A few repeats of Ocean's 12 cons make fans want to cringe and newcomers giddy with excitement. The dialogue still maintains its cryptic charm and overall the film is entertaining. Al Pacino continues his downward spiral as an actor. Andy Garica is fantastic. Everyone else is just as great. Bernie Mac should have had more lines. Brad Pitt isn't eating in every scene which is sad. Clooney's funny. And the thieves with heart bit wins audiences everywhere.

2.8 out of 5

[Letters from Iwo Jima ]

We all know Ken Watanbe's a great actor and Clint Eastwood is America's gift to the world; a living legend. But Letters from Iwo Jima does not strike the same emotional chord as many other recent Eastwood classics.

The most interesting aspect of the movie is that it got made to begin with. I'm not saying it's god awful; it's fine in its content and just mediocre overall - but the fact that 2 war movies got made simultaneously and each examined two different sides of the war is fantastic.

What's lacking in Letters from Iwo Jima is a central character that the audience can relate to. We have the unwilling Japanese soldier who'd do anything to avoid the war, but is caught up in it, just trying to survive and keep a promise to his unborn baby that "he'll be back." But he's not nearly enough. We have the courageous leader in Watanbe who is coined to be a "true soldier." But relating to him is also nearly impossible. So maybe the disconnect lies in the fact that the movie's not relevant to present day, but then again, I do not know anyone currently fighting in the army. It's easily missable.

2.5 out of 5

[In the Mood for Love ]

Brilliant colors, a nostalgic atmosphere, an amalgamation of Asian & Western cinema, In the Mood for Love is an excellent film. The story is very simple but very often it is not the story but the characters, music, cinematography, delivery of the actors, and pacing that sets apart good films from great ones. This is one of those rare noteworthy achievements in recent times.

Director Wong Kar Wai's mood-setting abilities for this film indulges you in his world. Two people vow that they will never make the same mistakes that their significant others have - the mistake of infidelity. That central battle of morals, ethics, and self-control is one fought with subtlety and visible restraint.

A haunting, melodic 1960s tone is set by the waltzes, traditional Chinese music, and cellos. Add to that dark lighting, mysterious movements, and two extremely well dressed lead characters and you glued. Such magnetism in the film will lead you to delve in deeper than expected into the minds of the two "victims." There is not an ounce of violence nor is there any explicit situation. Everything is done symbolically, with great taste, and attention to detail. A wonderful movie that you cannot afford to miss. Rent it right away.

4.5 out of 5

[Dark Passage ]

Humphrey Bogart and his wife Lauren Bacall star in a tale of constant conflicts. One should remark right off the bat that you do not see Bogart's face until 1 hour into the film. There are brilliantly directed character-P.O.V shots which are definite audience pleasers. But essentially our main man Bogie has been framed for the murder of his wife. We do not know who the killer is and maybe it is him whodunnit.

The next part gets even more interesting; a woman on the highway encounters him and takes him under her wing. He has nowhere to go and no one to trust so she has to do for the time being. The tale evolves into a half-unbelievable, half-interesting, half-OH MY GOD, when are they going to show his face? Eventually though things work themselves out - sort of - and we finally are given some resolution after a cycle of crises.

2.8 out of 5

[Brief Encounter ]

A British woman has semi-scandalous thoughts of love for another man. She is, by the book, a happily married woman with no real problems or issues. But this love she feels for the strange man is driving her insane.

That the movie is 1 hour and 26 minutes is one of its better qualities. Though, after watching it, maybe they could have just skimmed down the entire thing to maybe 15 minutes and saved us all the ordinary babble carried back and forth throughout the rest of it.

The best character in the film is a conductor who has a playful relationship with the owner of a train station tea parlor. Besides that, this movie has no redeeming qualities. It's just incredibly dull for our times and provides no significant insight into the cheating heart. A very generic and unwelcome experience.

1 out of 5

[Laura ]

Perfect in nearly every way, Laura stars Gene Tierney in the title role. This classic film noir also features none other than Vincent Price.

Laura is the classic film noir woman. Wanted by men and envied by women, her charm overcomes any negativity people might have to give her. She is genuinely kind, which is unlike the classic film noir characteristics of the leading lady. That's another reason Laura is one of the most well known film noir movies of all time.

Oh, Laura is dead and we are trying to solve the case from the getgo. From the eccentric sugar daddy and wannabe fiancee to the overzealous maid; everyone is a suspect. The motive is unknown and a major twist in the middle of the film ensures us that we haven't a clue as to whodunnit!

Very well choreographed and put together, Laura, much like most other classic film noir is a solid film. You better watch it! It's damn good.

4 out of 5

[Winged Migration ]

I have never been nearly brought to tears by a documentary before.

Winged Migration is a powerful, beautiful, cinematically wonderful gasp-inducing and mandatory watching.

The filmmakers focus on a large variety of birds and capture their migrations around the world. We see NorthAmerican birds, European birds, Arctic birds headed to Africa. For bird-lovers and nature lovers, this film is a treat. The reason it's so great is because of the way it shows us how birds and nature, in general, has been polluted and invaded by human beings.

Usually when we see someone hunting or we notice the high amounts of fumes and water pollution generated by a building we may show disgust and disagree with the whole concept. When we see the point of view of the birds and I do mean their literal point of view, it becomes clear that these helpless creatures are going to fall victim not only to their natural enemies in the wild, but also will die and perish on their anual journies because of society.

Absolutely breathtaking and worth watching, especially for hunters and those of us in society who actually own factories. Also meant for those who don't think twice before chucking their trash into the ocean or polluting in general.

3.7 out of 5

[Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds' End ]

Johnny Depp is great in Pirates of the Caribbean 3. So is Keira Knightley. This is probably her best performance out of the series of Pirates movies. So people, mainly critics, have been saying that this movie is too convoluted for its own good and that it is too long. Well it is kind of long but I feel that the film is just as enjoyable as the rest in the bunch. Though I prefer the first two a lot more, Pirates 3 carries with it that swashbuckling charm that had us all entertained to begin with.

Johnny Depp isn't just dead his soul has been taken and he's in a place where no one can get to without the help of the most deceitful pirates & Englishmen. So they all try to go get Jack back as was planned at the end of the 2nd movie. While doing so, they encounter adventure, more people realize they have pirate blood within them and fun sequences swing you from here to there.

It's not as good as the first two. It's still entertaining and leaves room for yet another sequel at the end of the film. Will there be a Pirates 4? I hope so.

3 out of 5

[Painted Veil ]

What would you do if you found out that your new wife was cheating on you? What would you do if you knew that she married you just so she could escape the pressure of family obligations? What would you do if you heard her in the next room when you came home and she was with another man in the bedroom?

You'll have to watch Painted Veil to find out or read the book that this dark, beautiful, and detailed independent film is based on. Edward Norton & Naomi Watts are perfect actors. Does it get any better than watching the two of them on screen? I don't think it does . . . not in this film. They are perfect to play opposite each other.

Edward Norton plays Walter - the man who decides on marrying this woman he's "in love" with after what seems to be only one meeting. They might have met more often in the book, but in the film, it seems that it's just one encounter. But then again we are talking about 1925 England and once they're married; 1925 China as well. Walter is a bacteriologist, Naomi Watts is trying to find her place in life. She's confused between pressure, lack of love, entertainment; she seems perpetually bored until they are faced with a deadly cholera breakout in a tiny village of China. At that point, she wakes up. With an equally talented supporting cast, the Painted Veil splashes a beautiful, subtle, and humble masterpiece. The film is carried wonderfully by the music and detailed storyline. You actually see the layers of each person involved and it's quite wonderful.

4 out of 5.

[X-Men 3 ]

Action packed and hitting all the right dramatic notes, X-Men 3 is surprisingly good. X2 was a fantastic film and though this movie has absolutely no relation to the comic books, it fits well into the world of the X-Men series.

We pick up in the film from the point where mutant & human relations are just beginning to improve. The president of the U.S. accepts mutants as they are but soon comes a new thing; a "cure" that could change mutants into humans. Jean Grey died in the last film but as we all suspected, did she really? Nope!

The phoenix saga of the series begins in this installation of the trilogy and mutants who want the cure are fighting mutants that want to kill the people with the cure. There's a fine balance of entertainment and pensive thought in X-Men 3. It is pretty fun to watch.

3 out of 5

[Spider-Man 3 ]

Some utterly despicable parts do not make a rotten whole. It's like an overripe banana; you know some parts are going to be dark and mushy and you won't want to eat any of it, but the rest of it is still worth eating. Why not, it's good for you!

Well saying that Spider-Man 3 is good for you may be stretching it a bit, but it is one of those comfort giving films. You know, comfort in the sense that it's summer and what would a summer blockbuster be without a new Spider-Man movie?

The story is overall easy to swallow and makes for a nice vehicle for some of the excellent action sequences. The way it is scripted, the dialogue, the screenplay which takes a hold of characters and puts them into seriously embarassing & irrelevant situations makes you cringe. There is that thing they do with Tobey Maguire's hair to portray the fact that he is no longer sweet anymore, but under the power of the symbiote and very aggressive - and it doesn't work. There are some random dance sequences. But the portions of the film that are relevant to the plot may not be true to the comic books, but they do hold true to the rest of the movies in the bunch.

Sandman is a much better villain than Venom. The arches of each character are different in Spider-Man 3. Mary Jane bounces around in her lukewarm reviews, two best friends Peter & Harry are also bouncing around back and forth from understanding to animosity to vague blurriness. And then come newcomers such as Eddie Brock who wants badly to get some cash and marry his hot girlfriend Gwen Stacy.

So a lot of the popcorn storylines mixed in with some dark elements never before seen in a Spider-Man movie. It's not Shakespeare, it's Sam Raimi.

3 out of 5

[The Family Stone ]

Romantic comedies set in the winter are just as good as it gets for chick flicks. Is it not? The Family Stone takes place some place in the Northeast where an extremely tight knit, fun loving, and liberal family joins together for Christmas.

Diane Keaton, Rachel Macadams, Claire Danes, and Sarah Jessica Parker bond on screen and get very cozy with each other's characters. Sarah Jessica Parker plays a newcomer to the family. She is the girlfriend of the eldest Stone son and will most likely be the new bride.

No one likes her primarily because she is too uptight, too narrow-minded, and too cold for this extremely warm family. The comedy is inherent within the characteristics of the Stone clan. You have the gay & deaf son which incidentally brings in another unique portion of the movie - a lot of it is in sign language. There's his equally gay black boyfriend with whom conversations about adoption occur. There is the NPR tote bag carrying co-ed played by Rachel Macadams. You have a party-loving stoner type son in the form of Luke Wilson. And to beat them all, a mom who curses, is up front with her kids, and loves them dearly and shows it with physical emotion.

It's a heart-warmer but mostly it's funny and a crowd pleaser.

3 out of 5

[The Queen ]

A beautiful account of Elizabeth II and Tony Blair's first term as prime minister are what take center stage in The Queen. A fantastic movie about decade old events that still are resonant because of the impact they had when they occurred.

We get a glimpse into the life of a Queen - what she has to deal with on a daily basis - and has been dealing with since the royal family gave up their official power in England and went towards the democratic form of government they have today. As the Queen accurately states; she has been having inaugural meetings with prime ministers since Winston Churchill. It should also be mentioned that all Queens, very much like holy Buddhist monks (Llamas) are told that they are chosen because of God/karma in the case of the llamas.

One would imagine that a movie about the dry country of England would produce a rather barren and dull film. This is not the case; we have the rich landscape of the lives of the royal family to explore. The Queen's relationship with Tony Blair is definitely one of the more beautiful - yes I said beautiful - aspects that is explored.

A rich, developed, and ultimately fun to watch takes on English politics and the responsibility of leaders.

3.8 out of 5

[Children of Men ]

A cold and relentless winter has fallen upon humanity. The crux of the issue seems to be that immigrants get treated like animals; they are literally put inside cages, and the rest of the world is barren. Barren as in no one can get pregnant. There has not been a newborn human child in ages.

The lack of new babies has put the planet; particularly the island of England a massive space filled with anger, destruction, hatred, and a bitter hopelessness.

But as we all know there is a baby to be born; and the mother is a pregnant immigrant girl. Her life has to be saved so that the baby, which represents hope, innocence, and a return to growth and fertility can also survive.

There is too much of a focus on the uprising revolutionaries who are willing to do everything in their power to fight the government. There is a lot of terrorism, a lot of bombing, and a bit of a disconnect between themes.

The film is well directed and the production design is spectacular. But overall, not as good as you would hope.

2.8 out of 5

[Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance ]

Senseless violence as a form of entertainment seems to be Mr. Chan Wook Park's film Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance. Having directed other ultra violent films such as OldBoy, Mr. Park seems to be a fan of the good old gory details when it comes to using pain & the human corpse as canvas.

In Sympathy, we are watching a twisted tale, somehow knit together of a mute-deaf man with extremely engaging facial expressions. He is trying to score a kidney for his sister. He lives with a revolutionary girlfriend who can both speak and listen. She is anti-American products & against the conglomerate.

The mute guy does not have a way to get much money from his dayjob as a laborer in a factory and so he devises a plan to get that money. This is the part where the film makes sense until.

After this about the next hour and forty-five minutes are spent on killing a lot of people with little to no emotion. There is some hate-killing going on later, but some of it tends to be accidental as well. So wouldn't you know it, bloods, guts, incisions, everywhere! A madhouse of gore and violence. I would definitely not recommend this for children under the age of 15. Not that we do that sort of thing here.

The direction is good. The story pretty much sucks. But it does draw you in a bit. You want to stick around and prepare to be disappointed.

2 out of 5

[Monster House ]

Let's cut to the chase since this is a pretty straightforward film. Monster House is a below-average computer animated film about a possesed house that terrorizes kids.

Now the nitty gritty. Monster House is filled with children and human beings as animated characters. Maybe this is why I kept wanting the movie to be live-action. Each of the characters did not have a unique or outstanding presence on screen. They were all passable as images and using live actors would have upped the level of horror.

The haunted house is known to eat objects and its housekeeper known for scaring kids away from the house. The film begins with a small girl's tricycle being destroyed by the home owner. That is something very intriguing about Monster House; it has tons of innuendo and situations which could be frightening to young children. Again, another reason that the film should be live-action and rated PG-13.

The story is average, the special effects of the house not too grand and ultimately this is a yawn worthy film. It is nice to look at in parts, but mostly there is nothing spectacular going on here.

2.5 out of 5

[Red Road ]

Red Road is about a woman who has clearly experienced loss. She is mourning her loss by engaging in the duldrum life that is being a surveillance camera monitor. Having access to almost the entire city of Glasgow, Scotland, the lead character calls police when she finds disturbing events occuring and becomes a little obsessed with one of the people she is watching.

The movie is way too long and while one understands the importance of portraying actions through CCTV cameras in a film about CCTV camera watcher; it makes for some dull imagery to stare at on screen.

The script is obvious at times and less mysterious than it tries to be. The big thing we are trying to figure out is how this one man has harmed the woman in the past so that she's bent on following him around. We also await what she has in mind as far as a resolution until the very end. The results are unsatisfactory at best.

The best part of the film is that it's spoken in Scottish accented English. The filmmakers and distributors thought that the accent was too heavy for an American audience to understand so it is completely subtitled. A dark, cold, and annoying film, Red Road is a gross atempt at narrative filmmaking. That it also depicts some hardcore pornographic scenes makes it seem that much more desperate for attention.

An unnecessary movie. Do not watch.

1.5 out of 5

[Whatever happened to Aunt Alice? ]

This is a most disturbing peeling of the onion film. We witness human nature at its absolute worst; deceptive, decrepit, jealous, weak, gross, and violent. The title, for anyone who is half awake, should clue you into the content of the film. There is a slight sense of maudlin carried out through the film, but that is simply because we live in 2007 and the film has a 70s feel. There is a yellow tinge of open vulgarity (and I'm not talking about words) on screen.

A recently widowed woman is left with very little by her late husband. He leaves her with nothing except for the contents in a briefcase. She is suddenly impoverished after enjoying a life of upper class life in Tuscon, AZ. So she starts to think on her feet. A real independent and unique one she is...

As we begin to see how she deals with her husband's loss the film becomes ultimately depressing and maddening. There are disturbing sequences of domestic violence throughout the film and if you are faint hearted, I'd sit this one out. There is a moral to the story and it has to deal with satisfaction. What quantifies enough? That's a question you will most likely find yourself mulling over amongst a few others regarding the same subject matter.

I do not recommend this film and I honestly did not enjoy it mainly because of the disturbing plotline but this is a film reviews page so I have to let you good people know, from a film standpoint, whether or not you should watch this movie. I'd say hell no. There is no need to watch this one. It's a well-crafted piece of cinema; no outstanding achievement save the insanely good performances.

2.5 out of 5

[The Page Turner La Tourneuse de pages]

La Tourneuse de pages or The Page Turner is a quiet film about a woman who hires a nanny to take care of her son. The nanny has an admiration for the woman that surpasses normal fandom. The mother, it should be mentioned, is a successful pianist. They live quietly in the countryside and her husband is often away.

There is not much here in terms of originality except maybe some of the music is really mixed well with the film's pacing. There is that constant tension developed between the pair of extremely beguiling women which is interesting to watch.

Overall though it's skippable. There is a lack of plot development, the characters get boring to watch after a while since they do not reach further than their initial goals. And in the end it's all a bit bland. Not enough of a thrill ride.

2.5 out of 5

[Celebrity ]

Woody Allen does not like to disappoint people. When you go watch a Woody Allen film, you know you're going to get a heavy dosage of New York City. You know you're going to get the finest performances out of all actors and you know you're going to hear a lot of cursing and discussions about relationships.

Celebrity is no different than any other Woody Allen film. It's a little disturbing though that since he did not cast himself in the lead; Kenneth Branagh seems to be doing his best Woody Allen replacement.

The film revolves around relationships. The title just gives it a new angle on which to showcase issues such as divorce, infidelity, lies, sex, fame, attraction, attraction, jealousy and all those wonderful things that usually accompany Woody Allen's romantic comedies.

One of the very fun parts of the film is that while we're watching how two people deal individually with divorce and what comes after for them; you're also trying to spot all the celebrities in the film. Adrian Grenier (Vince from Entourage) makes an appearance as the member of Leonardo DiCaprio's entourage. Typecast anyone? Another blast from the past is Scott Baio who has a non-speaking background actor role in the movie. Paulie Walnuts of Sopranos fame also has an appearance; a speaking one and so does one other Soprano cast member.

There are not too many stories to follow that your head hurts, but there's just enough of a filling of each to make the movie an intense and thorough trip through different relational hilarity. Definitely a witty, star packed affair.

3.5 out of 5

[When We Were Kings ]

Whoa! George Foreman with hair! Don King with the same hair but no white hairs and Muhammad Ali at his absolute finest. When We Were Kings is a documentary about the heavyweight championship of the world. The bout was fought in Zaire and a whole bunch of other folks like B.B. King & James Brown also travelled to Zaire for the fight. It was an event. It was the biggest entertainment event of its time.

Though many of us were not even born then, we get a great grasp of the atmosphere through the writers and media covering the event at the time. Writer George Plimpton was one of these cats. Everyone was more mellow, a little bit more carefree, and Muhammad Ali is a force. I mean he is intense. He is hilarious, he is charming, he is probably the greatest athlete and individual to grace the ring of all time. He is beyond a boxer, he is loved by every person in Zaire.

The best part of the film is watching footage of Ali at his finest. He speaks to the camera, he raises his magnificent arms to have a hundred thousand "Zairians" chant his name. He is the best. To watch all of this great close up footage of him is so satisfying. You just want it to go on forever. The documentary showcases the entire trip from beginning to end, the political troubles, the social commentary, the strength & influence of Ali over everyone, no matter where he went. A truly great find for the documentarians who put this together. Absolutely incredible and just pure fun to watch.

4 out of 5.

[Casino Royale ]

This is the first James Bond movie I've watched that does not trail off in the latter half. By trail off I mean, usually Bond movies get a bit overdone, weaker in the special effects, slower in the quips, and more about senseless action. This one actually held my attention till the very end, and it did not seem stretched.

This film depicts James Bond when he first becomes a Double O. This is the first case he's on and so it's nice to see that James can make mistakes as well. The plot isn't the most original, but do you really care? Eva Green is the Bond girl in this one and she's fantastic too.

Full of action, this film also features a really intense running sequence in the beginning. The freestyle-art of Parkour (freestyle running) is showcased full blown in the first engaging sequence of the film. Right off the bat, they have you suckered in and you're going to love the ride.

3.5 out of 5.

[Jesus Camp ]

Evangelicals make up 25% of the U.S. population according to this documentary. If that's true, then we're in serious trouble. The documentary depicts a preacher of a pentecostal church who is bent on "indoctrinating our youth..." She's clearly an unstable person; often hypocritical as when she defends herself to a Christian radio host who questions the brainwashing that evangelicals do to young children.

The film focuses in on a few youths ages are probably around 8-10. Each of the children is very highly motivated and involved in the church. One of the kids' mother home schools them on issues such as creationism.

We see how easy it is to get control over the mind of an 8 year old by instilling fear. We learn why some of the things we see evangelicals do that make no sense could make sense to them. Jesus Camp depicts a clear picture of how religion can turn into a powerful weapon. We follow these kids from their homes to the camp. We see how dedicated the preacher is to teaching the kids about evangelical faith.

There are scenes that will leave your jaw dropped, your mind in disbelief, and if you're watching it in a room full of people; utter silence based on shock or raucous screaming, depending on what type of people you are. A very powerful documentary that must be watched.

4 out of 5.

[The Prestige ]

Two magicians on the road to trick the world, along the way get trapped in outdoing each other. The deception is on many levels. It is the sole purpose of their existence. "The Prestige" refers to the end of a magic trick after you've been given a constant, shocked (the turn), and then finally the trick has come full circle to deliver the wow effect.

The movie is stretched a tad long, but the wonderful period depictions of the late 19th century are decadent and dark. The eeriness present in the film is only enhanced by the environment of constant mystery and hidden truths.

Acting is superbly strong although some of the accents trail off a bit from time to time. In any event, the movie does not stress its own prestige. As in, when the twists of the film are revealed they are done with little showmanship. They are interwoven and shown to us in matter of factly way, which makes it that much more disturbing.

The underlying themes of rivalry & obsession are truly riveting in the film. The mental violence and anger contained within the film is extremely discomforting. With all these great elements of fear, surprise, magic, deception, you just are not that interested at points in the whole of the film.

3 out of 5.

[The Puffy Chair ]

A roadtrip film way before Little Miss Sunshine. Well, maybe not way before, but still very recent, this deceitfully simple drama and slice of life film has a very poignant center. A shaky couple leave their Brooklyn apartment for greener pastures down in Atlanta. The goal is to pick up a puffy chair before reaching the south to give as a gift to the dude's father since it's his birthday.

Along the way the couple stops in to visit the dude's brother. And he tags along for the ride of their lives.

The dialogue is very casual and you would think that you're watching a home video if it weren't for some of the juicy visuals. A very nicely framed and directed film; the Puffy Chair gives us a realistic look inside relationships.

Not exactly witty, not exactly over-the-top, not too emotional, but it's definitely real and captures nuances that most blockbusters would miss in a story about love and growth.

3 out of 5.

[The Host]

A monster movie with comedy and metaphors is the best way to describe The Host. In it, an unexpecting family gets hit by great tragedy as a monster emerges from the river next to where they sell food from a cart. The cart is also their home.

With certainty this movie is very unique. It is similar to Shaun of the Dead except it's in Korean and has a monster that resembles the one from Pirates of the Caribbean 2 and Godzilla. The thing is pretty acrobatic as well. So what happens is that the daughter of the stupidest member of the family is taken away by the monster. The rest of the movie is spent trying to figure out where the daughter is. But it's not really all that simple...

The monster is said to be the host of a deadly virus that will destroy all of South Korea and it needs to be omitted. So there is quarrantine put on those people that have come in contact with the host. Then the symbolism comes in along with more hilarious jokes, serious situations. I wouldn't go as far as to say that this movie is scary. There are scary parts, but not the ones you'd imagine them to be.

If you're a person to whom sarcasm & wit (along with subtitles) are a foreign language, sit this one out.

4 out of 5.

[The House of Yes]

Holy incestuous dark comedy Batman! Parker Posey plays the maniacal twin sister to Josh Hamilton's subdued, unsure sibling. Tori Spelling, an actress? Apparently yes! She plays the fiance who is brought home on a rainy evening to this Washington D.C. home of the crazy family. The hilarious dark quips in this film will make you laugh out loud in shock and amazement. The jokes are not for the socially faint hearted.

The movie crosses many psychological barriers and socially accepted norms are thrown out the window. At times, you feel like you're not really watching this happen.

I can't really say too much without giving away plotlines so I will shut my mouth. It's super dark, not graphic, hilarious, well-written, moderately directed and Parker Posey, goddamnit, if giving independent films the Oscar was a trend in 1997, this movie would have catapulted her into that stature where people with golden statues roam. She's great. She plays a twin sister who thinks that she is Jackie O. She is not referred to by any other name throughout the film. The film would just do as well as a stage production. It looks like a play and feels like a play at times, but they do have some interesting sequences that use the film medium with strength. Don't watch it with your family members.

3.5 out of 5.

[Marie Antoinette]

A sumptuous medley of excess in royal France; Marie Antoinette features exquisite set decorations, patisserie, dresses, champagne, and regal traditions. Kirsten Dunst plays the role of the Austrian princess who since she was born was told and prepared to become the Queen of France.

As with other Sofia Coppola directed films, Marie Antoinette is light on dialogue and more concentrated on the visual. The delicacies may have been tiresome for some to watch - and see Marie's boredom reflected by her poor choice of friends & manners - but for me, they were the completely appropriate approach to the film's underlying theme of materialism as a result of, not the purpose of life - and a way to deal with life's misery.

After thinking about it for quite a bit, if Marie Antoinette was a contemporary, she would most closely be compared with either Paris, Lindsay, or Britney. All 3 were brought out of their shells a bit too early - they were child stars for the most part and as they came to on their own the public turned on them. Queen Marie had it a bit more rough, however, as history shows. She had an extremely weak Public Relations team and the film reflects that accurately. The paparazzi loved to hate her and in this case the steaks were pretty high as we see in the film's progression.

Coppola has combined modern day music & colloquialism into an otherwise period piece that leaves your eyes stunned. Though it did run for a bit too long, I don't see how anyone can be bored of the movie - which many people are...

3.5 out of 5.

[Happiness]

This movie has it all; pedophilia, rape, murder, suicide, depression, senioritis, deceit, sexual deviation. It's very interesting to watch the first time. Writer & director Todd Solondz reaches these heights of unhappiness in his dark comedy about several different lives. But it is not a cheap attempt to do so; there are graphic scenes, sure, but primarily it's the juxtapositioning of absolutely dire & depressing situations with everyday common ones.

One of these situations being a father telling his son all about masturbation and even offering to help show him how it's done. Another would be a threatening phone call to a vulnerable girl at her work place. Then there's Philip Seymour Hoffman's character who is bent on calling every girl in the White Pages and talking dirty to them.

It's by no means a happy movie; think of it like an inside joke that you and the director have created. Todd Solondz does have a sick sense of humor, but it is also done tastefully for the most part. So, it's something that is worth spending time over, only don't expect to take away a huge moral at the end of the story other than the first tenet of Buddhism; life is suffering. (*note* the movie is not black & white the press photos are.)

3 out of 5.

[Babel]

Incredibly similar to 21 Grams; Babel is a reminder to us that the Academy Awards do not always pick the best films for their nominations. Unquestionably depressing Babel is the unrelated story of several lives in different continents. Each person goes through a lot of grief and suffering but ultimately there are missed beats, illogical conclusions, and a mildly annoying undertone. The annoyance coming from the fact that since it takes 2 and a half hours to tell this story, you hope that it's over soon.

The performances are spectacular by each of the players. That is something I cannot take away from the film. But ultimately an incoherent, well-directed film with little impact from an entertainment or political standpoint.

2 out of 5.

[The Science of Sleep]

Imaginative eye-candy at its finest. A bit of substance, but not too much. This film is about Stephane who lives most of his life in a dream world even while he is awake. This gives way for Michel Gondry to really let loose and show us who the visual auteur of our century truly is. It's unfortunately not outstanding with the plot as it is with the visual.

Stephane meets Stephanie and a bunch of interesting co-workers as he joins a job his mother has got for him. It is to be the creative designer of calendars. But when he gets to the office he realizes that these people do not necessarily want to see his art work and just want him to work on the mundane nonsense.

Stephanie is Stephane's neighbor who shares his indulgence in trinkets, putting on plays, and creating spectacles. It is an unusually rich visual story that deserves to be seen if you are into beautiful visual arts.

3 out of 5.

[Click]

Adam Sandler plays an unlikable character who happens to fall upon a remote control that will fast forward the rest of his life. Kate Beckinsdale plays his hot understanding wife who really takes a lot of crap from him.

Christopher Walken plays a crazy maniacal angel with a remote control that will enable Adam Sandler to skip the boring parts of his life and then get caught up with himself later. So he says "I wish I was at the stage where I get my promotion," and he's fast forwarded to that moment and the rest of his life is gone. So eventually it becomes a serious movie from being a comedy.

It's not really that interesting at all. There are weak attempts at comedy - mainly it's a nice idea with poor execution. Don't watch it.

2 out of 5.

[Cache]

This French psychological thriller starts out with one frame that you see on the left. It stays on the screen without music and revealing the titles without a sound. There is hardly any movement in the shot and so you think it's a steady image. But there are people walking through the street and a few cars go by and you realize that it's moving.

The tuth is that it is a hidden camera's view of the house. A few cameras are put up around several places that Georges goes to. After he's been there a tape arrives at his doorstep and his wife and him both watch it. They try to figure out who is sending these tapes and for what reason. So the 2 hours that follow this first scene are an exercise in trying to unravel the plot.

The filming is absolutely crisp and the director seems to want us to go inside the shot and become the detectives. Although upon watching it I am not sure how good of a detective job I have done. There are a few questions left in my mind, but this is not as confusing as Swimming Pool was. It also is a lot less flashy. A very simple & quiet movie there is hardly any music in it - or actually there is not any music. The film also deals with the strained relations between France and Algeria in the 60s.

3 out of 5.

The band Wilco makes some good music. One of the band's recent albums was a huge indie success due to the unique style of how the music was created and through the buzz generated for the band due to the hardships they endured while creating this record.

The band's sound is a combination of lead singer Jeff Tweedy's sweet soft voice with a full explosion of melodious sound as accompaniment. The entire film is shot in black and white. It's a journey of creating the album and then witnessing a lot of live shows. And eventually seeing some of the troubles between band members inernally and also the adversities they face with their record label who seems to want to try to do everything in its power to not release the album.

The film is filled with great music very nice cinematography and somewhat of an engaging plot.

3 out of 5.

An ensemble of miscrients and acrobats fill this French dark comedy with great intrigue. I really dislike the lighting in the film and since it is shot completely in a studio it is a bit claustrophobic.

An out of work clown stumbles into this scary city where the butcher is boss. He provides everyone with food and no one else has any food. They pay him in corn & lentils. The meat is actually human meat. The butcher lures people into the building by offering them jobs, but then once they arrive he slaughters them and serves them up to the rest of the building.

There is a woman who constantly tries to commit suicide because a voice tells her to do so. There is an old grandmother who loves knitting. Probably the best parts of the film are when there are montages of sound & visuals that line up with rhythmic hula music or the tapping and playing of different instruments. Quite a nicely put together dark comedy, the film is definitely discomforting at times.

3 out of 5.

I was one of the people who was reluctant to watch United 93 when it first came out. I thought it was not yet time to watch the film. When I received it today I did not want to watch it either, neither did my sister, but we both sat glued to our seats and watched the jarring recanting of one of the biggest terrorist attacks to occur on the continental United States.

The film is very well made and very well rounded in its telling. It does not tell you how to feel, the events pretty much carry themselves out in a factual sense. But that does not mean the movie is not engaging in any way. It is probably one of the few films I have watched in recent times where I did not even have an urge to move.

We are given access to several air traffic control centers around the world and the events that took place on that day. How everyone started out 9/11 with great hopes and a positive outlook because it was a fairly clear day and how the first plane crashing into the trade centers became a clear harbinger of the absolute gravity of the day.

The passengers interact with each other on the plane and from the very first frame we feel for them and are attached to their stories since we know the outcome. To watch them go through the things they do is hopeful, intense, and absolutely heart wrenching. A very well directed film, you should watch this today. Because there is never going to be a time when it will be universally OK to go watch a movie about September 11th.

4 out of 5.

Brian Sweeney Fitzgerald is known as Fitzcarraldo to the natives of Iquitos, Peru. A place filled with large waterfalls, lush rainforest, and a lot of glue producing trees. This guy is insane. He has tried his hand at every business and his goal is to create an opera house featuring his favorite Enrico Caruso and Sarah Bernhardt. He crashes a party by putting a turntable in the middle of it and starts playing opera. He claims to have invented rubber. He is insane. His lover is equally insane; her name is Molly, and she funds his adventure.

We see Fitzcarraldo building a boat then getting the boat into the spiritually questionable waters of Iquitos and then after this is finished, he actually hauls the ship over a mountain - from one side to the other - on logs and such.

Directed by Werner Herzog, the film is beautiful to watch it has very long shots and is a classic attempt at the man v. nature scenario. But Fitzcarraldo isn't just any man and we also see him battling with words in hilarious back & forths with business tycoons, corrupt tribesmen, crazy tribespeople, and drunken & blind shipmates. Definitely a winner.

3.7 out of 5.

One of the greatest films of 2006, Pan's Labyrinth is an imaginative tale of a young girl who is forced to travel to the Spanish countryside in 1944. The era is of oppressionist Spain. The violence is ample in this film and carried out in a grim & gory manner.

We follow the girl as she discovers a way of escapism through an entirely different universe where she must tackle three tasks before she is granted permission to sit beside her father (the emperor) and rule a fantasy world. She is excited about this task since her submissive and pregnant mother is now wife to a tyrannical general.

The faun or fauna (Pan) is the one who guides the young girl through these tasks. He is probably one of the spookiest images present in the film. The music, the symbolism, and metaphors of the film are carried out harmoniously until the very end. It's perfect, scary, intelligent, wonderful, and worth watching.

Guillermo Del Toro deserves all the praise he has already received for this film. He combines a great story, a dark canvas, and indulges both those who are engrossed by history & fantasy alike.

4.5 out of 5.

You'd think for a film coming out during the holiday season, Pursuit of Happyness would be touching and memorable. It happens to be neither of those. It's okay for what it is but the trailer for the film pretty much sums up the entire story.

The only great part about the film is that it is a true story. Though I've heard that it is only loosely based on the truth...we know what that means. Nothing remotely interesting happens throughout the course of the film except for one scene in the subway. That scene is pretty touching. Oh and then there's a scene where they're playing basketball in this park which is elevated. It's nice to watch that.

So, Will Smith's character is down and out and through it all he strives to succeed and is very determined.

It's okay, you know? Better than most of the garbage out right now.

2.9 out of 5

I hate writing this but the Good Shepherd is a bad movie.

The film is put together haphazardly with enough close-up shots to make you claustrophobic. Bobby DeNiro's directing is not very powerful. The script is filled with plot twists that make no sense. There are moments that have no relevance to the story and you feel like this will be the case from the beginning.

Angelina Jolie has an amazing performance but her character is not built enough to make you realize the great work she is doing.

Matt Damon has a good performance but it is not nearly as interesting to watch as the few moments you see John Turuturro. He is awesome in the film. He has one of the only good jokes. DeNiro has put himself in the film too, but it's nothing worth talking about.

Overall, this guy supposedly is the founder of the CIA, but the Good Shepherd is not based on a true story. At one point I thought it might be because it was so boring.

Do not go watch this movie this holiday season.

2 out of 5

Parker Posey, pictured left in an unusually large photo for this reviews page has a problem. She is unable to achieve an orgasm in her marriage. The rest of the movie revolves around her marriage that is falling apart and her husband's affair and then her quest to achieve an orgasm.

It has interesting moments, but nothing special. But Parker Posey is an amazing actress, so it's worth seeing it for that, not much else.

1.2 out of 5.

For $1,100, it's a good movie. This guy Brian who has a huge crush on Drew Barrymore decides that he needs to get a date with her in order to be happy. Well, we get to watch him work out, train with fake Drews to practice his date, work his contacts to eventually wind up on a date with Drew. I won't spoil the ending, but it's a pretty laid back watch. The documentary is interesting, especially for those who don't like learning anything from films.

3 out of 5.

I just watched this amazing French film is becoming an all to familiar phrase to my friends and lovers. But it's not my fault that the Frenchies have had some amazing filmmakers in their country. I hate musicals and this French film is entirely a musical. I had no idea it was a musical when it started and I was so glad that it was when it ended. French dialogue that rhymes along with beautiful music; Umbrellas apparently was nominated for 5 Academy Awards when it was released in 1964.

Director Jacques Demy was influenced heavily by post-war American musical pictures and he wanted to bring that excitement to the French. He did so brilliantly and surpassing any film I have ever seen.

The story is of two young-lovers who we know are doomed for unhappiness from the moments they utter their rebellious love for each other to the world. Mainly the world in question here refers to each of the lovers' family.

The use of color in this film (and the remastering thereafter) are surpassed only by Vertigo. Not a bad list to be part of.

Amazing. 4 out of 5.

Clerks, the original film, was one of the greatest comedies of all time. It was clever, unique, different, funny, black & white.

Clerks 2 is a sub-par comedy which is hackneyed, idiotic, less funny, and in color. But it does have Rosario Dawson.

I had high expectations of the film and maybe that's why I thought it fell flat. Usually the humor included in this movie is supposed to make you laugh a lot but the jokes are really just not acerbic enough to make it even worthy of the Clerks title. The funniest bit about Jay & Silent Bob quoting the Bible at random parts was chopped from the final cut. It's just blah.

2 out of 5.

Big Fat Liar has a great script and similar to cover songs of Baby One More Time by the English band Travis; it could have been a much more well-known film had it involved adult actors.

Frankie Muniz plays a guy who lies all the time. He is Bart Simpson come to life except with a lot more intelligence. Amanda Bynes is an overacting child actress who fills the role of looking like an innocent cute girl very nicely.

The film revolves around one English class story-writing assignment. The kid doesn't do the work on time and so he has to re-do it by the evening or else he goes to summer school. After writing the story, he rides his bicycle to school to hand in the paper but on the way he gets hit by a limo carrying a big time Hollywood producer. The producer snags the story and Frankie Muniz has to go to summer school. But worst than that is the feeling that his Dad doesn't love him anymore.

So to gain his Dad's love back Frankie Muniz goes to Hollywood to find the producer and have him give a call to his dad. The film has great Home Alone type moments, a come back from behind type of victory. A David vs. Goliath plot till the finish. It's really quite enjoyable.

3 out of 5.

A great journalist known for his ability to get the scoop before anyone else dies in the beginning of this Woody Allen comedy. On the boat to eternity, he speaks with a woman who suspects she's been poisoned by the Tarot Card Killer. Unable to resist the urge to pounce on this great opportunity the journalist channels great investigative reporting energy and finds Scarlett Johansson's Sandra Pransky to write the story.

Woody Allen is a magician who somehow gets involved in Sandra's investigation but provides a buttload of laughter. The movie is absolutely crazy funny. It's stupid funny, but along with the lunacy, it's got a short run-time, a caper-driven plot and Scarlett.

The reason Woody Allen films are great is because only Allen himself can play neurotic and be classic Allen - every other big named actor simply becomes a puppet of the plot and character. It's indulgent in the best way possible.

4.5 out of 5.

Four siblings are shooed out of a war-filled England by their mother so they could go and live with an absentee professor and a cranky maid.

After several nights of boredom, a simple game of hide & seek turns their quiet time away into an adventure and eventually a war - an epic battle between good and evil in the land of Narnia.

I have never read the book but the film, simply put, was okay. The special effects were not the best, but the actors were very believable and though many scenes seemed to borrow from other major epics, it would be enjoyable for anyone who is a fan of the story.

2.5 out of 5.

I was reluctant to watch Jarhead. It sat on my desk for weeks. I finally watched it last night. Dynamic is the best way I can describe the film. It's a well told story without the usual maudlin stereotypical war-film crap. We are following staff sargeant Swafford and his battalion into Operation Desert Shield. It was called Shield before it moved to Storm. We are given indication of their time in the desert from the 14 minute mark up until the end (which was something like 250 days.) We are also given the total number of troops gathered in the desert to fight against Saddam throughout which ends up being something like 570,000.

The film is told as if a friend described the war to you; except Sam Mendes (the director) does it in vivid detail. The film contains several characters but by far the most brilliant and beautiful one in the film is the desert itself. The cinematography helps carry out the desert's major role in the film. Whether we're watching it in waves or at night in fire & oil. Day or night, empty, vast, meaningless and meaningful; and often times haunting the desert is the most interesting and naked character in the film. The images will remain implanted in your mind forever and you will not want to forget them. I wanted to watch it all over again after it finished.

The plot is based on a marine's life and how waiting for a war to come can be more taxing and relentless than actual combat. It is not your average war adventure story though some elements do remain the same.

4 out of 5.

Stranger than Fiction is one of the most original films of the year. The concept is very different but Will Ferrell is weak as the film's lead. He does have a strong supporting cast in Maggie Gyllenhall, Dustin Hoffman, Emma Thompson, and Queen Latifah. But even with this spectacular support cast the filmmaker fails to deliver completely.

Harold Crick is a boring taxman who works for the IRS. His life is precise and so are all of his actions. One day he starts hearing a narrator following his actions. No one else hears the narrator; only he does. So for example, Harold would be brushing his teeth and thinking some thought and the narrator would be describing exactly what Crick is doing & thinking. That gets Mr. Crick freaked. The initial reaction to the narration is something that seemed a bit too polished and easily accepted. There was a lack of connection between Crick's reaction and the audience's.

That failure to connect completely at every moment throughout this fantastic plotline is the only part that misses to deliver. But the connection may also depend on what type of person is watching the film. It's a nice effort and you can always watch Dustin Hoffman.

2.5 out of 5.

If you're looking for a film with witty dialogue an intricate and grossly ego-driven plotline then you've found possibly the best movie of its kind. All About Eve is a brilliant film from all aspects; acting, writing, and directing. The snappy dialogue is better than most available today and you will find it to be surprisingly hilarious at times.

Young Eve Harrington wants nothing more than a chance to see her idol Margo Channing (Bette Davis) perform on stage. A vulnerable creature, Eve (Anne Baxter), is polite, humble, and extremely beautiful. She finds herself entwined in a life of serving her idol and we begin noticing her true intentions long before she asks to be the understudy to her idol.

It's quite delightful to watch the snappy back and forth dialogue between the absolutely indulgent characters in the film. You'll have a smile on your face just because they make it all seem so natural and glamorous.

Besides being a Shakespearean comedy or tragedy depending on how you look at it, the film's directing and techniques are quite interesting to watch. For example, the film starts out in the present and after pausing on a single frame one of the three narrators take us into a flashback. We are finally plopped back into the present and the story is then carried forward. It's quite a fun watch and the fact that Marilyn Monroe has a bit part in the film is also part of its over-the-top driven charm.

4 out of 5.

Whoa it's Martin Scorsese and he's made an average film. Why did this happen? Well, all the parts were hired perfectly for the job, the story was a good one but something about the consistency of the film felt off. The gel of soothing that he usually applies carefully to most of his work was missing.

The Departed explores the lives of two cops; one corrupt and another straight. One with aspirations another with nothing to lose. Both are strong, smart, and played well by Matt Damon & Leonardo DiCaprio. It's fun watching the two work together on screen.

Jack Nicholson stands out of the star-studded cast as a truly unique performer. There are moments in the film where we're not sure why the scenes are being played and what relevance they have to the rest of the movie. But overall it is interesting to watch as many small secrets are revealed throughout the course of the film. Of course the revelations would have been much more exciting had there been more suspense added to the plot.

2.3 out of 5.

Colin Farell has not made many great films. This one is not that good either but his performance is better than average which made it an interesting watch on my flight back to the U.S. I had never even heard of the film but seeing the dingy sepia of the cinematography and a voiceover narrator driven plot I fell into it as I did my cup of yogurt.

Farell is an aspiring journalist who moves to Los Angeles. He comes with high hopes and after a while becomes miserable for lack of inspiration. That all stops when he meets Salma Hayek. He finds his inspiration and begins writing. This gets him published in a newspaper and he delves deeper into the life of Hayek who is a waitress.

All the elements of a great film are present in Ask the Dust but there is a lack of passion and chemistry in between Farell and Hayek. It looks like a hard-worked film rather than something that came naturally. Donald Sutherland's talents are wasted as Farell's drunk and broke neighbor.

2 out of 5.

Recommended from a very reputable source, Lage Raho Munna Bhai is something of an oddity. It is the first original Indian film in history to be remade into a mainstream Hollywood blockbuster (Mira Nair is working on bringing it to the U.S.)

The film is actually a sequel but there is no sense of continuity between the first and second except the 2 main characters and their occupations. The word "bhai" in Hindi literally means brother. But the term "bhai" in Mumbai slang is something you'd call a Don or a thug.

The two main thugs are Munna bhai and his right hand man, Circuit. In the film Munna bhai has stopped paying attention to work - so Circuit handles it all for him. The work usually includes kidnapping and holding people for ransom, theft, collections, and so forth. The reason Munna stopped is because he is in love with a radio host. The goal is to get on the radio show to meet the host and meet his crush. In order to do so he is forced to learn about Mahatma Gandhi. Staying at the library for 3 days, Munna begins to hallucinate that Mahatma's ghost/spirit is following him around. This scenario is funniest when he gets drunk with Circuit.

Throughout the film Munna sees Mahatma Gandhi and instead of doing Dadagiri (gangster-type things) he starts learning something called Gandhigiri (way of Gandhi; non-violence, truth, and such anti-bhai values).

The movie is funny, charming, poignant and relevant. The songs are actually good in the film so if you traditionally dislike Hindi films because of the songs, you won't mind this one so much.

4 out of 5.

The remake of an Italian film; The Last Kiss is very poorly glued together. The lives of 3 couples in different stages of their relationships are explored in the film. From a carefree bartender who has just learned the meaning of tantra through his new fling to an engaged couple, a married couple with a child, and an aging couple who have lost love in their relationship. Paul Haggis is a great adaptor usually but in this case he fails to deliver a solid story.

Honestly it's just not worth the time at the movies. I wish I had rented it instead - I probably would have enjoyed it more because you tend to enjoy these types of incomplete films more when you're bored out of your skull.

2.4 out of 5.

Dead Man's Chest takes us to a time when Elizabeth has been imprisoned due to helping Captain Jack Sparrow's elaborate escape. She bamboozles her way out of prison and learns slowly that she and the Captain pirate have a lot in common; they are both selfish with good intentions. This also causes a spark to grow between the two characters in the film.

We find Jack Sparrow on "Isla de Muertos" or Island of the Dead where he has taken the role of God to the island's natives. A lot of fun ensues after this sequence. There are incredible action sequences that are long and entertaining. Three-way sword duels, climbing alongside mountains, rolling in gigantic hamster wheels, facing terrible sea-monsters and ugly squid pirates - this movie does not stop entertaining you until the very end. I cannot wait to watch the third installment of this fantastic world created by Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio.

5 out of 5.

[Hollywoodland]

Pathetic in its execution. Lame in the ability to capture noir from a brilliant cast. Flawed in the scripting. Weak in its execution of the ending which leaves everyone wanting more. Ben Affleck is great as George Reeves.

1.5 out of 5.

A dysfunctional family, despite their individual differences, goes to attend a statewide beauty competition for their 9 year old daughter, Olive in California. Steve Carell plays the depressed uncle Frank and the other characters have their own quirks. A grandpa that snorts heroin, a mother who is trying not to panic, and a brother & son who hates everyone and has taken a vow of silence.

Though the characters are colorfully designed there are beats of time when the film tries hard to be funny and fails. A few moments capture the essence that the entire film tries to portray. Some of the film tries to put itself together in odd ways. There is little to no chemistry between Carell and his new roomie the quiet brother/son. This wouldn't be a problem except there is a reach for some kind of camraderie there.

It is an average film that has been overhyped. The soundtrack is pretty good though.

3 out of 5.

A modern day film noir set in a California high school. You'll forget about the traditional setting, you'll be transported into writer and director Rian Johnson's perfect film noir masterpiece from the minute the film starts.

A twisted, dark, and frightening storyline unfolds as we witness a dead body, a girl, lying in a ditch, her pale figure sprawled out with her hair nearly in the water that passes through it. Above a hunched figure contemplates the scene before him.

The film literally will pull you in like none before have. We start to learn about an underground world that plays in the seedy and seemingly innocuous high school. Codes and a completely different language borrowed from the 50s buzz about in a way which still accomodates the present colloquial ear. Each character plays their part with such charm that we forget we're in high school at all. In fact adults and parents are only mentioned in earshot and seen a few times.

It's almost as if high school is the underbelly to which normal society's rules don't apply. It is the perfect setting for a film noir. It has all the same elements. An achievement that needs to be recognized and applauded. A perfect film noir.

5 out of 5.

Remember remember the fifth of November. The mask of Guy Fawkes is worn in this memorable and superior graphic novel movie by none other than Mr. Smith of the Matrix. Hugo Weaving is never actually seen in the film but the voice behind the mask belongs to clearly him.

Fighting scenes were not as much violent as they were meaningful due to the strong emphasis put on the ideology behind the action. Code name V has decided to stir things up in the government and bring about change. Along the way he bumps into Natalie Portman's foxy character and both of their characters begin to reach their individual arches.

Progressive, relevant to current events though the book was originally written in the 80s. A noteworthy movie because it is among the best in its comic book genre.

4 out of 5.

Worst movie ever is a good way to describe Two for the Money. This stench filled stinker - pardon the repetition - freaking stinks. Do not bother watching this movie. Do not waste your time, do something else.

Why does it stink? Well, poor direction, random episodic nonsense, idiotic plot, disgusting attempt at creating a metaphor out of television organized gambling scene and life. Simplistic, dull, horrendous, unimaginably stupid and overall difficult to swallow film overall.

The acting is terrible. The music is terrible. The production design is terrible. The lighting is terrible. The movie is just not made with any kind of sense. Al Pacino keeps getting worst with his picks for movies. I have said it before and I will say it now, he needs a new agent or he needs to not make deals just to bang out some additional cash.

0 out of 5.

The novel-turned Richard Linklater animation extravaganza is a very good film. For once, Keanu Reeves is out of his normal setting and the swiggly lines and flowy colors help a lot. A deeply disturbing film from the first few frames, Scanner Darkly is focused around substance D; a drug that has caught a hold of society and is dragging it down. Reeves is a detective who has to rid society of this scourge while also avoiding the temptation to indulge in it.

At certain points in the film, you will leave with a sense of pure delivery of the message. Often times films do not succeed in delivering their message even after it ends. A Scanner Darkly has a few highlighted scenes that are directed as almost throw-away phrases or sequences but they will stick to your mind for a time to come. Who knows, maybe you'll even start wanting to read the book.

A very artfully orchestrated set of surprises await us as the movie unfolds. The trippy sequences in which you easily get lost help create an enigmatic experience. Robert Downey, Jr. is probably the film's strongest force. He rolls out cracked up scenarios of conspiracy with ease in his high states. If you aren't paying attention; even in a state of sobriety his words and much of the interaction he has with Woody Harrelson's character will leave you confused and lost.

A powerful movie with a strong anti-man message. You have to watch it. It will stick in your mind for a few days.

4 out of 5.

[Corpse Bride]

Tim Burton & Johnny Depp's first collaboration since Edward Scissorhands is a delightful watch. The clay characters are immediately grotesque and lovable simultaneously. The music is wonderful and the story follows a shy groom-to-be, the daughter of a noble-family's marriage. When things do not go according to plan on the wedding night, the groom has somehow found himself avoiding being married to a corpse bride.

He wakes up in the underworld where the dead drink often and meddle in each other's business . . . very similar to their breathing/living counterparts. Mostly being lost in song and dance, the Corpse Bride is trying to marry Depp but he is trying to escape and marry his first intended bride. It's fun.

3 out of 5.

[The Island]

There is no question that Scarlett Johansson commands attention wherever she turns up. In her first scene in this Michael Bay action flick, heads will turn. She is not scantily clad nor is she in any compromising positions. She appears inside of the factory-like environment where she lives with a bright smile on her face. It's quite beautiful. Wait, you want to know about the movie? Fine. It's okay.

Better than your average action movie, The Island is a heavy-handed piece that is directed by a surfer dude. It could be an extremely dark thriller of sorts but instead it's a brightly shot action movie. It holds some sense of suspense - there are fun moments. The comedy is weak. There are a few cool chase sequences and Ewan McGregor does a good job too.

2.8 out of 5.

[Barton Fink]

What happens when a writer fresh off the success of a Broadway play about fishmongers goes to Hollywood? A great piece of cinematic achievement. The cream of independent film crop shows off its chops in this Coen Brothers early classic. Filled with the oddities based in Americana that only a Coen Brothers film could conjure up; Barton Fink is an amazing movie.

A squirmish artful liberal screenwriter; Barton Fink (John Turturro) is called upon to write a Wallace Beery wrestling picture. Not having the slightest clue how to do so; we see him befriending his neighbor (John Goodman) at the shabby hotel he's staying at and trying everything he can to please a studio boss that has taken a liking to him. But when studioheads take an interest in you, it means you better had watch out. With his bitch of a servant, the studio boss ranges in emotions from an insecure first-born son to a sycophantic dog.

With nothing to written but an opening sequence, Fink's time in Hollywood is mainly taken up by staring at the photo of a woman sitting on the beach in his hotel room and talking at his neighbor who is a travelling insurance salesman.

A brilliant display of acting; symbolic Americana and delicious turn of events; Barton Fink is a film for film lovers. This is a movie you can sit back and enjoy because it has been planted with great detail. 4 out of 5.

[Lady in the Water]

It will capture your imagination though it will take some time to let it sink in. There is too much talking in this film which is unlike M. Night Shyamalan films. And though this may be somewhat of a giveaway, there is no twist ending.

Lady tells the story of a narf who comes upon Paul Giammati's character who is a super of The Cove apartment building. With the help of a woman who has heard of a fairy tale regarding narfs from a very young age, Giammati tries to uncover the secrets of this sea-nymph creature. As we begin to meet all the different characters living inside of the apartment complex, some of them seem like they should have been eliminated. (brief spoiler alert) The critic character delivers lines like a zombie-robot on anti-depressants. One can understand that this is done in order to make a point, but it is truly just a poorly played out joke.

There are hair-raising moments in the film though not where one would expect them in an M. Night movie. The film works best when the dialogue is not cheesy or too convoluted. In a few scenes you have characters deliver messages through another person. The reasoning becomes a bit more clear once you leave the movie but keeps you annoyed while you're watching.

There are some acting snafus here and there, but M. Night surprisingly pulls his biggest role off well. How much you like the movie will dependent very much on what is left to your imagination. Usually M. Night is successfully able to grab our attention from the very first frame, in this one it takes a bit longer.

The music is perfectly chosen, the CG is very well done, and the fairy-tale film definitely creates a world all its own with a set of morals which are easy to appreciate. The film will haunt you in a good way and with all its faults still will keep you interested.

3 out of 5.

[Dave Chappelle's Block Party]

Do not expect this to be a comedy or a plot-driven film. Block Party draws attention by way of making us realize the power that good hip hop music can have on several people. It was director Michel Gondry's idea to actually bring the music acts back to a gritty part of Brooklyn (Bed-Stuy) and just give the people what they wanted. Awesome hip hop music.

The Roots crew serves as the band for nearly all the performers and features Mos Def, Talib Kweli, Erykah Badu, (the lady) Jill Scott, Common, Dead Prez, the Fugees, Kanye West and a couple of other soulful, meaningful, beautiful and vivacious acts in hip hop today. The best part of the documentary are the performances and the one-on-one conversations that Chappelle has with many of them.

It's a very relaxed experience and some great jokes are peppered in with positive messages. The film succeeds because you're given both sides of the people involved; you see them as down to earth, personable, friendly individuals and also as talented individuals who are very cognizant of their skills and know just how to use them in order to uplift a crowd. It's truly wonderful to witness the artistic culture which is not so mainstream be represented in an accurate and entertaining way.

4 out of 5.

[M]

Fritz Lang's first talkie is a widely regarded classic. There is a murderer about town and he's killing little girls. This causes wide panic and disarray. There is absolute fear in the hearts of the general mob-like public. It is so intense that if anyone so much as walks next to a girl on the street, he becomes a suspected murderer.

A well-thought out thriller with elements of social commentary that could only exist and thrive under the hands of genius. It is a timeless story with a great deal of suspense, drama, and sometimes unexpected comedy.

3.5 out of 5.

[The Greatest Game Ever Played]

Directed by Bill Paxton, there are two protagonists in this wonderfully vibrant golf movie. One is a young American who comes from a poor family and the other is an older (but not too old) poor British man who despite his multiple championships in golf is unable to ascend the British social ladder. Those goddamned British have always treated people like crap. They imperialized the world and in this film they pulverize the older gentleman's cottage when he was a young lad in order to make way for a golf course. "What's golf?" he asks the devilish looking man in the top hat, "It's a gentleman's game" he responds.

And there you have it, the setting for a film with two underdogs trying to make it. The opening sequence alone is enough to give those with a thirst for great imagery more than they could have asked for. There are moments of pure originality and brilliance in the cinematography and direction. Special effects are used to create an otherwise boring game of golf into an invigorating tale of chasing a dream while living in reality. A definite crowd-pleaser.

3.5 out of 5.

[Oliver Twist]

Please sir, can I have some more? Yes you freaking may! Roman Polanski's take on the Charles Dicken classic is a delightful watch. Despite negative or ambivalent ; the movie is perfectly directed and recreates the world of Oliver Twist with great care and beauty. The story is well-known; Oliver Twist is an orphan who has a streak of bad luck ever since his parents die.

The 10-year-old has seen more trouble in most likely a year or two than the rest of us would ever see in an entire lifetime. He leaves a Christian slavehouse for a funeral owner's home. From here he decides to run to London where he hopes to find a better life; and that he does . . . in a strange way. Oliver runs into the artful dodger, a boy who is most likely a year or two older than Twist, but acts as his godfather. Stealing a loaf of bread and guaranteeing a space to live; Dodger takes Twist into his wing - which is the senile thief-master, (don't know a better term for him) Fagin's headquarters. Fagin is a kind-hearted man who refers to his entire crew of boys with "dear" and is a strange sort of father figure. Played admirably well by Sir Ben Kingsley; Fagin represents both good and bad for Oliver's future.

As they run into different street crime sort of ordeals, Twist encounters a few unruly characters from the underworld and also has his run-ins with the well-to-do London folk. We watch Oliver as if he was our own and care for the outcome till the very end. Polanski has captured the imagination of the novel very well and translated it into beautiful images that are likely to leave you with a delightful taste.

4 out of 5

[Superman Returns]

Superman returns after much hype and a Tuesday night (Wednesday) early opening. The Man of Steel returns to the big screen and Brandon Routh for all you doubters was the perfect choice to play the iconic role. The cast was solid, the music was superb, the story was interesting though not intricate. After landing on Earth 5 years after he disappears, everyone greets the return of the great hero as if he was reborn.

Lois Lane with boyfriend and son is very unavailable to Clark let alone Superman. Her Pulitzer Prize winning article, "Why the World Does Not Need Superman," is the talk of the town until of course you know who returns. Luthor and Kittie (Parker Posey) make a nice pair on screen and some antics are laughworthy while others are a miss. The antics at the Daily Planet are not too intricate, the relationship of the super-couple is what takes center stage in Bryan Singer's baby. The minor rescue and crime-stopping adventures are still shown, but very mildly. Luthor's plan in this one is similar to Costa del Lex from the original version - but just like the rest of the movie, bigger & special effects heavy.

There are a few interesting action sequences, a lot of flying sequences which is particularly nice since the problem with many superhero movies is that they don't give you more than a mere glimpse at who you want to see the most. In this case, Singer nails it by giving us a generously large dose of Superman flying shots. A movie that won't get boring even after the fourth or 40th watch just for the pure spectacle and reminiscence factor.

3 of 5.

[A Prairie Home Companion]

It is hard to dismiss Garrison Keiller's slow moving, folky, never kitschy, always entertaining and always genuinely American radio program A Prairie Home Companion. So why not attach Robert Altman to this radio show and have it acted out entirely on stage with great actors and entertaining music? No reason not to. A very entertaining film, Prairie is best when dirty, quick-witted, and funny. The parts that lag are when Virginia Madsen's white-clad Dangerous Woman character float about the stage as the shows characters interact with each other discussing the final episode.

Meryl Streep is by far the most outstanding performer out of the entire bunch and it's hard to pick out of this group of talented individuals. She plays a hippie-like mother who does not really have it all figured out but knows one thing; making music is her passion. Opposite Lindsay Lohan's young and confused teen who has a questionable need to express herself through suicide poetry; Streep shines as she has never before. She holds that Prairie home charm; something you cannot learn but always just have inherent within you.

Garrison Keiller is entertaining to watch on the stage as we see that the show is very much an extension of himself. He does not need to worry about missing a beat because the program is his existence. Quite an interesting and entertaining movie.

3 out of 5.

[Wedding Crashers]

The trailer for this film tells you that Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn are two guys who really love crashing weddings to meet women. It's practically all they do for about the first half hour of the movie and most of it is carried out in one single montage. The rest of the film, we follow Owen Wilson's character who falls for a Senator's very attached daughter.

As he tries to leave his crashing ways, Vaughn finds himself a victim of the youngest daughter of the same senator. A cast of other colorful characters are present on the screen making the film outrageous at times. But there are parts which are just plain and simple difficult to understand (their words, not necessarily their actions). But this is not a movie you watch to gain something in your life. Watch it to laugh and it will pretty much accomplish that goal with ease.

2.8 out of 5.

[Mission Impossible III]

Quick paced with little character development great explosions, hectic aerial shots and some truly incredible stunts. An action movie with little heart but one that continues to thrill and excite. A non-stop rollercoaster ride and much better than Mission Impossible II. The acting with Tom Cruise progressively seems to get worst with each film he does, he has lost the ability to differentiate between real life and acting. It always seems like you're watching Tom Cruise the personality more than anything else.

Philip Seymour Hoffman does not get much of a chance to explore his villainous character in the film. Supposedly a man who provides the world's terrorists with weaponry and other destructive devices. There are holes in the plot, but when Maggie Q (pictured above) is on the screen no one seems to really care for anything else. The film is packed with big names like Laurence Fishburne, Jonathan Rhys-Meyers and Ving Rhames. Again though, do not go to this film looking for depth or the meaning of life. Some great shots were taken in Shanghai and most of the stunts or all were performed by Cruise himself. Some cool gadgetry is involved too. No brilliant plot, but it's very quick, does not allow you the chance to breathe. It's not that bad.

3 out of 5.

[An Inconvenient Truth]

Al Gore presents this film which really should not be a film for the world to ingest. The movie is 1 really informative Powerpoint presentation mixed in with a few minutes here and there of Gore sitting behind his computer in a car, in a hotel room, or on the phone giving bits and pieces of personal narration.

The movie is basically the presentation of global warming which Al Gore has given literally thousands of times on tape. He's on a stage surrounded by an attentive audience talking about how our world is getting really hot and that by the time our children grow older, much of what used to be will not be. The scary aspects of the film show the world's sealevels rising 20 feet within a really quick time period.

Though the information is riveting and the content is provocative, the film really is not that entertaining. Wait for it on video and watch it along with those who care to learn about how to slow down the negative effects we already have caused.

2.5 out of 5.

[The Bicycle Thief]

This classic 1948 Italian film won several awards at the Oscars when a category for best foreign film did not yet exist. The film showcases poverty in post-war Italy through a small family whose entire means for survival is represented through a bicycle. The man of the house needs a bicycle for his new job of gluing posters in various parts of the city. So the good wife sells off their bedsheets and receives enough money to get him a bicycle and save 100 lire. As the film's title would suggest the bicycle gets stolen. And it is really heart wrenching to watch the struggle of the man and his son go out on the town trying to find the bicycle around town.

They run into the thief or suspected accomplice initially and wave through churches, psychics, and the generally angry and hostile public. The picturesque piazzas that we see in Italian postcards and travel ads are nowhere to be found in this film. Instead we see a gritty, dark, and overall disturbed environment. A non-stop and tiring journey, we really do feel like we're looking for the thief along with the protagonists in the film.

An interesting watch. 3 out of 5.

[Nobody Knows]

A really long and depressing film, Nobody Knows revolves around four children of the same mother who discreetly leads the life of a prostitute/escort of sorts. We never see any particularly egregious behavior displayed the mother in full light but the subtle hints are as obvious as the poverty these children live under.

The claustrophobia does not bother the children in the film, but it will leave you with an accurate idea of what it is to live a life in secrecy. The film starts with the mother moving into a new apartment with two visible children and two suitcases. When she enters the apartment a young boy and young girl pop out of their individual suitcases. Clutching a tiny doll and a smile, the young girl who emerges is proud to have kept silent and accomplished this covert operation. They now can live in peace and only in peace - they are forbidden to go outside the apartment or onto the balcony which overlooks a quiet Japanese neighborhood. The oldest son is given the responsibility of watching over the children while the immature and apparently selfish mother goes to earn money.

The children do not go to school. Their daily lives consist of eating, playing games with each other, and going to sleep. There is no type of interaction the only one who is educated is the oldest son and that through a book called "Beginner Level Japanese" As the film continues we see the son take on more responsibility and face monumental decision making. The film is shot mostly in the same neighborhood through its entirety leaving images of sadness that will linger for a while. A well composed film with gripping reality and minimalistic tones.

4.5 out of 5.

[Al Gore Documentary]

Spike Jonze's short 13 minute Al Gore Documentary surfaced first on the Wholphin DVD periodical by McSweeney's. Shot more like a home video than a documentary, the doc goes through Al Gore's family farm where we get a chance to see the man behind the madness. A calm introspective look before the storm. It's more casual than anything I expected because in the doc the former vice president of the United States says that he goes to the farm to be calm before prepping for the Democratic National Convention. He just goes with the flow sort of and it's damn relaxing and home-like to watch.

Politicial documentaries are always one of two things controversial or agreeable. I think it's simply because of the reason that if any politician is worth his/her weight in gold they know how to gain people's confidence and make themselves seem like they are more right than the other candidate. What better way to do that then show Gore at his most comfortable, most calm, most uninhibited self. He is really funny, charming, sweet, endearing, intelligent, rich in content and everything else we never thought he was. There is no controversy in this political documentary because there are no opponents; only clear, concise, and well presented opinions.

The documentary starts out by Spike Jonze going out to the former presidential candidate's home. There we are introduced to Gore through his parents, his wife, and his daughters. Gore seems like a down-to-earth man with an extensive collection of VHS tapes. In one scene we see him deciding along with his daughters which movie to watch for the evening. Like any good documentary we see the human side of the subject; a side that we had not seen before. Gore seems interesting and captivating. His knowledge of the world seems to be sound and he seems to be a genuinely good person. A very refreshing watch and one that will convince you that Al Gore is supposed to lead this country out of depression and into glory.

4 out of 5.

[Nine Lives]

Nine Lives is a brilliantly and logically titled film which has managed to get the best performances out of each of its cast members. Each performance is what acting students could cling onto as their guiding light and resource for how to draw something out of very little. The film's focus is telling 9 painful and emotionally driven character stories. It feels like something will interconnect all these stories but that never really hapen aside from some characters appearing in more than one storyline. This is where Nine Lives gets annoying.

To pool together such a rich cast with heart-wrenching, cold, and often times compelling stories and not have them connect into at least a minimalistic plot ruins the film experience for the audience. There is not a single strand of information or satisfaction that you receive. You're constantly rewarded with moments of different characters who are in pain and suffering due to imprisonment, abandonment, sex, drugs, sickness, and death. But at the end you're sitting there and mulling over why the hell you had to be put through such misery for no purpose. What was the underyling theme? Aside from the first tenant of Buddhism; Life is Suffering, not much else. Nine Lives stops at just this first introducing us to pain and various forms of it. This results in a depressing after-taste with no therapeutic elements. I would advise for those who were thinking of watching this film to just stop and not bother; unless of course you're in need of a great acting lesson from masters of the art.

2.5 out of 5.

[Brazil]

Brazil is the explosion of Terry Gilliam's thoughts onto film. He does not hold back. Everything and anything he has thought of in his lifetime is jam packed into this 2 hour and 22 minute film. It's an absolute crazy combination of a world and place that is beyond strange and yet it still somehow is very applicable to current political and social issues.

We do not know why the film is called Brazil although Mr. Gilliam does start rambling on in the DVD's commentary about why - though he never completely does. The film was originally supposed to start with a rainforest where a beatle is flying in the air and all of a sudden a machine comes and uproots the rainforest in Brazil and the beatle flees the horrible mess. Then we see those trees transferred into a plant where they're turned into paper. The next scene, according to Gilliam is the one that is included in the film where a ton of bureaucratic paperwork spews out of a machine and as one man begins to do his daily drone-like duties a beatle comes into his room fluttering about and making some noise. This, in turn, causes the man to stand up with that stack of paper in hand and kill the beatle. Hence, Brazil.

From here we are transported into one of the only sensible or easily recognizable plot-portions of the film. A man is mistaken to be another man and arrested. This false arrest is witnessed by a woman who lives in the apartment above that man's family. Incidentally the folks who arrest people in Brazil - the bureaucratic enforcers of the Ministry of Information - do so by breaking down every possible escape route and also sometimes drill holes in surfaces above the place of attack to penetrate. So this arrest is the beginning of the world we see Gilliam set up. It resembles a machine infested city similar to that of the Martian terrain portrayed in Total Recall, but not as organized. Large ducts invade the entire land and this is how information and other things are transported. The team of bureaucrats also have warned society about "terrorists" but whether or not they truly exist is questioned by a handful including Jonathan Pryce's character.

Jonathan Pryce plays the son of a great bureaucrat whose mother insists on using their connections to get him a position higher within the bureaucracy. Pryce is a smart man but one who does not like the society he lives in. He primarily lives in a dream world where he's constantly flying and meeting with a beautiful woman - the ubiquitous woman of his dreams. He also fights monsters made up of unrecognizable machine parts and while in reality is constantly trying to get normal answers out of everyone who seems to be incapable of the task. We follow his adventures along with others as he battles bureaucracy and has trouble keeping sanity.

The film is weird. Beyond weird. Beyond the weirdest thing you have ever watched in your life. It's truly abstract. You think that abstract film is impossible? Watch this film and you will change your mind. Though there is a definite message encompassed within the film, its texture, images, timeline, organization, methods, and anything else that usually has some order are either non-existent or beautifully twisted. A hell of an experience. One that every person alive should indulge in at least once. A philosophical piece of art with cathartic over-the-top delivery. I am not going to give this film a rating, to do so would be an act in lunacy.

[Akeelah and the Bee]

Akeelah is a smart young woman from Crenshaw. She has a lot going for her but is afraid to stand out in a place where such a thing could lead to seriously negative repercussions. We see Akeelah face challenges of being smarter than the other kids at school with reluctance at first. When she receives coaching and guidance through a semi-broken down professor is when Akeelah realizes that she was meant for greater things. The great thing in this case happens to be the Scripps National Spelling Bee competition.

A series of cliched circumstances including death of her father, a single mother with no free time, a juvy bound brother and bullies at school are at the base of the plot of Akeelah. But what makes them interesting is that the film never dwells on one part for too long. The lack of depth is clear in the film, but being that it is the story of the underdog, you will find yourself holding back tears at portions of the film. It's a well-acted and sometimes even bold testament to reality in the life of an 11-year old at school. Best when it keeps to the spelling bee competition and away from cliches. 3 out of 5.

[Dial M for Murder]

The reason Alfred Hitchcock is still respected and admired today is because he never gives you the entire story until he feels the audience has been challenged enough. Dial M for Murder will keep those who are not used to unlocking puzzles clueless until the very end. For those with a knack for puzzle, murder, and mystery solving prowess, you may figure it out a little bit before he gives you the answers, but you will still enjoy the unraveling plot very much.

A very nice watch, Dial M for Murder is based on a play. The tale is that of conspiring deceipt and planning the perfect murder. The tale is that of an adulterous woman, a jealous husband and a lover. When the wheels start turning and the murder is ordered, you never realize the surprise and fun that lies ahead of you. The story is just the perfect length with brilliant direction and often hilarious dark moments. We see new characters introduced into the picture just when we think everything has been said and done. A very unorthodox yet palatable structure makes M a very juicy film. The kissing does not hurt the luscious factor of the film either. Though very discreet and from modern standards conservative kisses are exchanged in the movie; they leave a sense of indulgence that Cinemax could not come close to relaying. The kisses require almost an essay of their own.

The film must be watched. 4 out of 5.

[Down in the Valley]

Edward Norton is back and he has not lost his touch. Mr. Norton plays a very complicated character in this still unrated film. Evan Rachel Woods is what else but Lolita once again. She's really got this role down, I'd like to see Ms. Woods expand her on her excellent acting abilities to other roles. Nevertheless, both Norton & Woods' characters are at the center of the film. A well-directed and twist-filled plot leaves you biting your nails and uneasy throughout its entirety.

Norton plays a man who may or may not be slightly off-key. He walks into the valley where Woods and her brother live with a corrections officer who is rarely home to do any parenting. The problems are clear from the beginning - there is a constant struggle between the father and the children due to generational and emotional gaps. They lack love with each other and therefore have issues to deal with.

Norton befriends Woods while he is working at a gas station. The two of them hit it off and begin a loving relationship that is forbidden by Woods' father. Though we see clearly what is going on, the movie unfolds to reveal a few twists and turns that keep it interesting. A bit over the top in some cases and even a bit unbelievable. But, overall the film keeps your attention.

2.9 out of 5.

[Criminal]

John C. Reilly as a lead character is difficult to get used to considering he plays mainly "you know who I'm talking about . . . that guy" in every movie you've ever watched. But the plot of Criminal though a bit bland at times works just well enough to make Reilly believable as the lead. The dialogue delivered in the film tries hard to have an edge like that of Quentin Tarantino, but they do not flow very naturally. Same could be said for the camera movement which tries to be fluid but ends up just looking disturbed.

Diego Luna is very convincing and likable in the film. Maggie Gyllenhaal is next to invisible though the small part she has, she plays well just like any other that she has in the past. There is not too much originality at play in Criminal, especially since it's the remake of a Spanish film called "Nuevas Reinas." But on a night when you don't have much to do, eh why not. 2.3 out of 5.

[Notorious]

Alfred Hitchcock's non-mystery masterpiece. So what's the intrigue? It's Alfred Hitchcock, stupid! Do you expect this guy to make movies that don't suck you in from the first moment you set your eyes on the screen? Notorious is the story of a woman hired to uncover the secrets of a group of Nazi friends in Rio. It helps the story that the woman is an alcoholic with a history and knack for depression. It also helps that Cary Grant is a cigarette smoking charmer.

A group of U.S. spies with Grant as one of their point people ask Ingrid Bergman's character to spy on the Commies in South America. But when love conquers Grant & Bergman as any South American getaway would a most unlikely love triangle falls into place. The kissing scenes are something that will leave you interested in the film, as well. They are very up close and extremely personal. And not in a gross way.

The directing is masterful and though not a mystery, Notorious is still curiosity driven. You are always nibbling your nails waiting in anticipation for what happens next. Notorious is short, interesting, and will definitely leave you satisfied. 4 out of 5.

[Wallace & Gromit: Curse of the Were-Rabbit]

Claymation at its finest. Voice acting is superb. A great family film, Wallace & Gromit is about a cheese-loving English inventor and his clever dog, Gromit. The two run Anti-Pesto, a veggie-protecting organization that fights rabbit infestation. When a mysterious monster, the Were-Rabbit, is seen by the town's minister and his menace of ravaged veggies experienced by the townspeople, it's up to Wallace & Gromit to solve the case. A beautifully made film with unique techniques and super-cute rabbits. 3 out of 5.

[Brokeback Mountain]

There is no doubt that Ang Lee is a gifted director; he is one of the best. Brokeback Mountain as we all know by now is a movie about gay cowboys. Just how gay are these cowboys is in question though. The two men love each other and yet carry on different lives in which they seem content, as well. I honestly felt at junctures in the film that they were not really in love with each other. But that changed when I realized that the film takes place in 1963 and that the men had no other option. Still, there is a slight miss between the pain that is supposed to be perceived by the audience and the actualization of this distress through the film. To the same point, however, the first encounter that the two men; Jack & Ennis have is just as mysterious if not utterly disturbing.

We do not see the love affair that is about to take place coming until it does - and that only because we've been bombarded with the huge marketing campaign behind this film. But then you realize that the hints were there the entire time; subtlety in the acting is a part of the reason that Brokeback Mountain is a captivating film.

Should you watch this film? Definitely. It is very slowly paced and allows for the scenery to leave you in awe of shepherding, Wyoming, and quiet depression and just how cool it looks on screen. The music is poignant to a degree which if it was missing, the film would lot of its character and value. A perfect blend of great talent and a subversive plot made the film popular. The end results were satisfactory and watchable. That they were cowboys and expressed their love for each other differently than one would anticipate might have been a part of the reason the film was not that emotional for me.

The truth is that better love stories have been told many times over. But because of the haunting direction, a mesmerizing soundtrack, and good acting, Brokeback will leave you thinking you've just experienced a revolutionary picture. 3.5 out of 5.

[Water]

A carefully created film, Water is one of Deepa Mehta's most powerful films to date. This is the third and second-to-last in her series of "matter" pictures - she has already made Earth & Fire, Wind is next. In any event, the film revolves around 1938 pre-independence India. It's about widowed women who are forced to live in solitude; away from normal society; without any pleasures or indulgence in life - at least that is what is prescribed.

The show-stealing character is a 7-year-old girl named Chunia. Her equally adolescent husband meets death at a young age and she is forced to leave home, family, and relatives and go into this Ashram for widows. A quiet place run by a widow that looks like an aged-man at first; she is miserable here. The story then goes into a forbidden meeting between one of the other widows (Lisa Ray) with a revolutionary who has just begun to hear buzz about Mohandas Gandhi - a principled man whose only religion is Satya or truth.

The film's rich character is derived through a dreamy journey back into a monsoon season India. Water plays the symbolic matter with which life, love, devotion, and revolution begin and end. A very moving film. 4 out of 5.

[Inside Man]

A sonorous and familiar voice to Bollywood movie watchers claims stylish authority over New York City's well-filmed structures from the minute the movie begins. Working with AR Rahaman's amazing melodies, the song is "Chhaiya Chhaiya" performed by Sukhwinder Singh. A playful, entertaining, and head bopping tune the song truly sets the flow of the film off on the perfectly inclined notes. A thriller with minor flaws and some confusion, but a movie in a class all its own. One like it has not been released in quite a while.

Spike Lee with the assistance of first time big screen scribe Russell Gewirtz tells the story of a perfect bank robbery. A perfect bank robbery as Clive Owen's determined face and accented English tells us. The detective to stop him is Denzel Washington; a man with little work and who is put up to the challenge due to his senior being out. A laid back yet cunning man, he also has the dubious rumors floating about him, a coke deal, and some $140K.

Jodie Foster plays what I am going to call a facilitator. She facilitates the impossible and gets paid large sums of money for it. Her stake in the film comes into play because the owner of the bank has something he does not want to be taken from the vault. These minor conflicts all come together when a hostage situation begins in the bank and each character's roles play out in a stylish, entertaining, and comedic ways.

You will find yourself rolling off the floor laughing and also just trying to figure out the meaning behind the actions in the film. Again, a movie with New York style that no other director could pull off but Spike, he truly has created one of his best films. There is great chemistry with the camera and each one of the stars; hats off to Spike for an entertaining night. 4 out of 5.

[Serenity]

A television turned into a film and it shows in the acting. But a television show turned into film also translates pretty well for the plot of Serenity. Sci-fi fans have gathered around this movie as if it were the second coming. Seriously, there's a huge cult following.

Sometime in the very distant future where people just hang out on ships and the universe is just a flight's question away a group of intergalactic thieves have a ship; Serenity. They have a rebel leader of a ship that floats around space robbing people, but also is in the bad habit of having a conscience. He has some love story unresolved with a woman from another planet. The rest of his crew is filled with a horny female techie, an idiot jock with not many lines, a nerdy yet devoted brother and a 17 year old assassin who was created this way by the government. The girl's powers are displayed only when there is a code word that when uttered, she loses all control and becomes a machine bent on killing or disabling every person on sight.

In the film, we follow the crew as they slowly unravel why exactly it is that they are chasing the girl. It's not just the fact that she's been created by them to destroy in a universe that is focused primarily on spreading the message of peace. The villain in the film is by far the strongest actor and intriguging character to explore. He has all of his faith put into the government's system of peace. He acknowledges that he himself is a sinner, but that he is committing actions that are necessary to protect the overall plan of peace. It rings themes that we can connect with and overall is executed well.

There isn't always a nice gelling between scenes in the film and the fact that the screenwriter had to pack 3 or 4 season's writing into one film probably had something to do with it. 3 out of 5.

[The Ice Storm]

An American Graffiti of sorts, The Ice Storm is directed by Ang Lee and stars Kevin Kline, Tobey Maguire, Elijah Wood, Sigourney Weaver, Christina Ricci, and Katie Holmes. An ensemble cast that could almost never occur now; The Ice Storm is cinematic opera at its best. Two neighboring families in suburban Connecticut deal with their marital and family dysfunction in various ways. The main out being drugs, infidelity, and alcoholism.

In a time when Richard Nixon was under great scrutiny through the Watergate scandal, we witness the very personal scandals of these two families in their anti-establishment ways. The film delivers a message about imperfection, tackling a point of view of social drift between mainstream and subversive cultures and how equally unstable they are. There is quite a bit of controversial material in the film in that the children of these neighbors do not act any differently than their adult counterparts. In no other part is this clearer than when Christina Ricci's teen character is found with Elijah Wood - sans pants by Kevin Kline's character. The reaction by Kline, "look, I'm not angry . . . I just don't think he's right for you."

There are ironic twists and hereditary symptoms shown in the film like no other I have watched before. There is a cause and effect for every action and a deep sense of discomfort by the end of the film. Through its dark analogous tone, The Ice Storm reaches its conclusion with the help of its titular natural disaster and it connects effectively with the audience. A silent and depressing film. 5 out of 5.

[Tsotsi]

Tsotsi, we quickly find out, is the South African word for "thug." The lead character is known by no other name by his peers and fellow thugs other than Tsotsi. He's often quiet and conveys emotion mainly through his facial expressions and actions. Many times though, there seems to be a not so clear indication of his mood or why he's compelled to do certain things, which leaves you frustrated.

Tsotsi starts out in a very gritty manner; we see the gang orchestrate a somewhat designed attack to rob a man of his cash. It seems they have practiced this routine before because each of them has his role perfectly executed, until something goes wrong. They go too far. This kickstarts Tsotsi's arch of change. In haste after an altercation with one of his gang members who utters the value of decency, Tsotsi seems scared or maybe he's angry, or perhaps he regrets his actions. Whatever he feels, his uncertainty leads him to carjack a woman and half way through his haphazard drive away, Tsotsi realizes that the woman's baby is in the car.

Tsotsi's discovery of the baby is what we follow now throughout the film, as he finds ways to take care of it. There are some graphically disgusting and sad scenes portrayed as the baby is kept inside of a paper bag cuddled with blankets. He is incapable of taking care of the baby, but tries very hard to do so. There is little sympathy in Tsotsi but his journey is somewhat interesting to watch.

There is an amazing soundtrack in the film. But the primary problem is the lack of coherence between the violence and grittiness with the plot of the film. There is severe violence, an ordinary plot, and no compelling emotional connection developed with the characters. 2 out of 5.

[The Squid and the Whale]

1986 Park Slope, Brooklyn is the setting for this domestic dramedy about separation and divorce. There's a greater focus in the film on the children's viewpoints about the separation and that's what makes it enjoyable. The dialogue is truthful, constant, and wild. The greatest character is the younger son who favors the mother; his reaction to the separation is in support of his mother and her new beau (William Baldwin). The older son is a little more favorable towards his arrogant, has-been father (Jeff Daniels). And Laura Linney gives one of her best performances as the mother and wife who is constantly seeking growth in her career and personal relationships.

Between the two new houses, a new girlfriend, and problems at school, the two young boys are directly impressed upon by the events and people around them. Noah Baumbach (writer/director) is successful in creating a perfect cause & effect scenario with as we watch the actions of the children. Some very memorable shots of Park Slope, Brooklyn add credibility to the home video like cinematography of the film.

The Squid and the Whale is often times laugh out loud funny - epsecially when we're watching the younger son rebel in his own way to the situation. There is a lot of sexual tension that develops between the older son and his father's live-in student/girlfriend. We also watch him deal with his own relationship with a first-time girlfriend as the distance between his parents grows and as his father constantly bad-mouths the mother. A varied stream of actions combine to make each individual character in the film very unique and complex. There is no traditional hero present, but that's exactly the reality we're longing for. 4 out of 5.

[Rififi]

A classic French film noir, Rififi is based on a novel that concentrates on the fighting between Nazi Germany and Arabic & North African men. The film, however, is very loosely based on the book. The heist that a few skilled thieves pull is almost a throwaway in the novel - according to the film's production notes - and that heist and everything leading up to it and after is the film's focus. And with good intention and a heartwarming eye to detail in the production design. Just what is Rififi? Well, it's not exactly clear still to me, but I think it means that urge to do something evil. And the film revolves around a group of hoods.

The crew's members consist of a playful Frenchman, an old and serious thief who has just finished doing time and been betrayed by a woman he probably once cared for, a family man with a child, and an Italian who is a lover of women. Each has their own specialty and their target is a jewelry store. When they first meet inside of a coffee shop to discuss the target, it is impossible to miss the tiny details of their meeting. The way they drink their coffee, the subtlety with which they maintain themselves in a public space while discussing what will end up being one of the biggest thefts to date in France.

There is a nice melee of suspense, finesse, and noir beauty in Rififi that is hard to resist. It seems like we are actually on the job itself since the job itself moves in Kubrick like pace. It raises the stake for the audience and is nothing like a modern heist movie which usually moves pretty fast. One would t hink, as well, that security systems would not be a match for today's Las Vegas styled casinos, but one would be very wrong in making that assumption. The alarm which occupies the jewelry store matches the intense sensitivity of modern-day security systems.

Rififi's title makes it seem that we will wind up rooting for the bad guy and we do. We want the thieves to succeed as we do in any good film or story about robbers. But Rififi adds a few tiny scenes that assure you that it is undoubtedly wrong to steal, but if you, for some reason are not paying attention, you may miss them. 4 out of 5.

[Mrs. Henderson Presents]

Judi Dench's best comedic performance is sometimes deflated by the script which tumbles in and out of cheesiness. The wife of a deceased general, Mrs. Henderson is forced to find something to pass her time after two of the most important men in her life have passed; her son being the other. Unlike her friends, Mrs. Henderson, in 1937 England does not have the taste for jewelry and purchasing items for herself. Instead, the absolutely eccentric 70-something purchases a theater in which to show a combination of a Revue and Vaudeville.

Since Mrs. Henderson does not quite know how to tackle the creative ends of running a stage, she hires Vivian Van Dam, a legend in the England theater world who just happens to be out of work. The two hit it off on the wrong foot from the beginning and their opposing viewpoints are laugh out loud exchanges. The humor is dry - often racist and imperialistic in its tones - and the delivery by Dench is beyond perfect. She is Mrs. Henderson in the film.

The problem Mrs. Henderson Presents encounters is not in anything except that it is very difficult to make patriotism be backed up through nudity. The film tries very hard to justify certain unmentionable actions as giving to the greater good, but ultimately it fails in convincing. There are great laughs, but also, a huge slowdown right from the middle up until the unremarkable ending. 2.8 out of 5.

[Match Point]

A film that literally had people talking before, through, and after the screening; Match Point is a very entertaining movie. A Woody Allen expert, I am not, but what Match Point offers is a mixture of good conversational writing, subversive plot twist, and a classic look and feel to the entire piece.

Jonathan Rhys Meyers plays a social climber who comes from a poor background. But, with the ability he has with a tennis racket, he is able to get a teaching position at an upper class tennis club. From here, he enters the life of a very wealthy family who, as a visual treat, manages to own prime real estate spots around London and the countryside. Scarlett Johannson is amazing as the to-be sister-in-law who tries her hardest to resist the charm of her evil, ladder climbing counterpart, but simply fails.

Woody Allen properly allows the characters and plot to saturate in your mind before carrying out one of the spookiest endings out of any other love triangle film I have seen. The sound and music in the film are superbly orchestrated and compliment the overall classic tragedy feel of this wonderful film. 5 out of 5.

[Born into Brothels]

A photojournalism project of sorts, this documentary follows the lives of children photographers learning the techniques and art of the photograph while trying to take a step out of their daily lives in the red light district in Calcutta, India. We travel through narrow alleyways and filthy backyard stones. The life of an Indian slum dweller is by no stretch of the imagination glamorous or artistic - it is very sickening - yet these children manage to smile daily as they take photographs.

There is real hope and talent possessed in the group of children we watch and the subjects of their photographs range from their family members to the people on the streets. A few of the kids stand out and it's great to see their faces light up with excitement when they are watching their work being hung at a Sotheby's gallery. All the photographs were auctioned off to pay for the childrens' educations.

The film is well edited and there are truly grand qualities in the emotions and depth of what we are shown on screen. There is plenty of great light in India and the film captures it well. The music matches up well with the film, as well as we are treated to primarily religious hymns and even some Bollywood tunes.

What stands out about this documentary is the care the filmmakers take to actually do something positive with the childrens' lives. They do not merely teach them photography - they give them an out. A chance at something they would have never otherwise come in cotact with. Rarely do we see the journalist get involved in their story in such a positive way. It's delightful to watch yet also heartbreaking because not all the children are able to take advantage of a better life, some by choice others because of their parents or guardians. An absolutely touching film. The DVD is a great rental because it follows the children's progress since the documentary was released and won an Oscar. You also get to see what the kids plan on doing with their lives and even their reactions to the documentary. 4 out of 5.

[King Kong]

From the beginning, King Kong sets a path of expectations. Peter Jackson clarifies that we are not living in modern times by scoping New York City from a vaudevillian perspective. We see street performers, beggars, and middle class America. Poverty is so rampant that actors and actresses do not get paid and once her theater closes, Naomi Watts is left with no choice but to beg a producer for a gig. We do not see Kong until well into this 3 hour and 22 minute Peter Jackson remake.

Jack Black is possibly the worst choice to play the Orson Wellsish character of a no holds barred filmmaker who will go through illegal means to get his picture shot. He tricks the screenwriter, Adrien Brody, to stay on the boat and writes fake checks to set sail on his excursion to find Skull Island - the undiscovered land where his film will take place. Upon discovery of the island, immediately there is havoc as the natives are not welcoming of the newcomers. They take Anne Darrow, played very well by Naomi Watts, as prisoner/food for Kong. And even if you have not watched the film you know that this film is about a love between Kong and Anne and the protection that Kong develops for Anne.

The film does touch a couple of emotionally true points but mostly it loses credit in Jack Black's acting, the poorly written script, and the overhyped but sub-par special effects. The entire film is practically shot on green screen and a few enormous soundstages. Though these elements could be used to the advantage of the film; Kong fails in creating anything remotely realistic save some Andy Serkis magic via Kong's facial expressions. Production notes from the film indicate that Serkis stayed on set even when he was not needed to help Watts and the rest of the crew to get the right reactions to Kong, but Andy Serkis cannot do everything. The film will leave you extremely bored if you are not willing to accept the fake effects as real. 2.5 out of 5.

[Munich]

By far Steven Spielberg's most complete, thrilling, frightening, and absolutely painful work to date. Munich is based on the real events of the 1972 Olympics hostage crisis when Israeli athletes were taken as hostages and subsequently murdered by a group of Arabic men. Munich is based on the book Vengeance by George Jonas and written for the screen by Tony Kushner and Eric Roth, with a score by John Williams. An all-star team put together the film and it shows. There are rarely moments of lightheartedness in the film and that is with good reason. You are not given a chance to blink an eye in the film due to the constant action.

Lynn Cohen plays an amazingly written Golda Meir, Kushner who penned Angels in America seems to know exactly how the mind of a politician operates. After the events of the Olympics, the Israeli Prime Minister calls in one of her favorite old bodyguards, Eric Bana to carry out a mission to assassinate every single Arab that was responsible for the Olympics event.

Bana transforms from a loyal, almost cherubic and innocent do-gooder into one of the most wanted assassins on international grounds. But every person besides the typical innocent bystander in the film is a sniper; with the tongue or with a weapon. There is absolute disloyalty, cruelty, and a lost sense of purpose amongst the ranks of international espionage and terrorism, according to what Spielberg shows us. No man or woman is innocent in the war between Israel and Palestine - and those who are not directly involved, somehow stand to profit from the mess.

There is no doubt in my mind that this is the best movie of 2005, no matter how depressing or realistic it is. Spielberg takes us behind the rifle and makes us feel the pain of an assassin through his quick paced directing and up close look at war. A brilliant movie; one of Spielberg's greatest accomplishments. 5 out of 5.

[March of the Penguins]

A lot of squabbling, mating calls, and baby chirps of penguins are heard in March of the Penguins. This definitely is not a feel good film; there is too much reality involved for it to be any more uplifting.

We are taken through the ancient mating rituals of the Emperor Penguins in Anatarctica begin. Above ground, they are one of the only animals to survive in sub-zero temperatures without food for sometimes over four months. The documentary takes us through how they pick a mate, the nurturing of their egg, and finally the birth of a new batch of penguins. Through it all the penguins face very real enemies in predators as well as survival in the cold. An interesting question many will no doubt find themselves asking is why the penguins continue to mate even though the chances of survival of their offspring is so little. And as you're taken in by the white frozen mass and the brotherhood shared by these cute animals, you'll find yourself asking a bunch of other questions as they relate to survival.

Although very entertaining; the documentary is often times lacking in the scientific data you would hope for it to issue. The DVD features an even better documentary on how the two French filmmakers made it through 9 months of filming the penguins in their natural habitat. 3 out of 5.

[The Big Empty]

Directed and adapted from novel form by Lisa Chang and Newton Thomas Sigel; The Big Empty is an insightful, often times hilarious, and a cozy 20 minute short film. It starts out with several doctors inspecting Selma Blair (Alice) from a lower vantage point. The Big Empty refers to her vagina. One gynecologist thinks that it is a rash, another offers no solution, still others think a prescription is in order. Finally, what better way to solve a problem than to broadcast it nationally on a television talk show studio - in front of a live audience. The height of excitement in this film is the amazing job that the duo of Chang and Sigel have done in directing the film. An absolutely beautiful 20 minutes of film of 2005. The Big Empty, when explored, reveals a tundra, a chilling place that many enter and then are spit out at any given time. Many enter, all come out, except for 1 that is. To find out what happens, you'll have to watch the film. It is currently available in Wholphin; a DVD periodical. 5 out of 5.

[Syriana]

There are a lot of plot lines in this film and they cover political and newsworthy topics that we are all familiar with. Big oil, big government, big terrorists, and big lawyers. It's difficult to gauge the film-related topics of Syriana because of it's extremely political and almost documentary like nature.

We travel the globe following individuals involved in every single aspect of the circle that is involved in forming our daily lives - knowingly or otherwise. There is the big oil company who wants to merge with another to make oil cheaper for Americans to consume. There is no more oil left in the United States, so we go to Iran. In Iran we encounter an old king and two sons. One son wants to reform his country and actually create opportunities for the citizens in the Middle East. He wants to give women the right to vote, he wants to see expansion within his own society - an idealist. The other prince wants to be rich and powerful. Then we have members of the CIA who are given orders to keep them in trouble, there are investors who turn into economic advisors, and a law firm that seems to be controlling everything.

Though a bit convoluted, the film captures the process of how it sees why there is currently a war in Iraq and why past wars existed. It is stated clearly as day that the events are fictional, but the absolute logic of it will leave you trembling at the possibilities. An uneasy film to swallow, Syriana is engaging, thought provoking, and well acted. And in the end, things do make sense, but you will find yourself being lost at moments.

An outstanding score helps the film's subtlety remain its course. It is never didactic and therefore easier to watch than if it were just a rant of sorts. There is a reason behind terrorists, the birth of one is seen in the film. There is a reason for joint ventures, the dealmaking is seen in this film, there are corrupt politicians, government officials, and powerful lawyers. We see these people carrying out actions that become a part of the headlines and we see what they were doing before they made it next to your morning coffee. It brings you full circle. 4 out of 5.

[The Shape of Things]

A play first and then a film, Neil Labute's The Shape of Things is a defining moment in screenwriting. The power of the film comes from its ability to portray realistically a world which has never until the play been captured on screen. We start out with 4 main characters, a bullying best friend, a new girlfriend, and a former love interest who is now engaged to the bullying best friend. Then we have the perceived main character - a nerdy security guard at a museum who falls hard and madly in love with the liberal art grad student.

Rachel Weisz plays Evelyn Ann Thompson; a whimsical free spirit who completely transforms and brings about huge change in Paul Rudd's Adam. The film lacks seriously in the proper use of the medium. There is nothing spectacular about the actual movie; if it weren't for Weisz and Rudd, and one of the best screenplays ever written, the film would fall flat.

The screenplay is a twisting love story. A love of things, a power struggle, and the ultimate question of morality is addressed. The film does not go back like a Sixth Sense or similar fare to show you the twists; you simply understand it at the very last moment. You are left stunned and your heart sinks. It is well carried out, with questionable execution in the direction as well as some casting snafus. A flawed masterpiece. 2.5 out of 5.

[Sea of Love]

Al Pacino, John Goodman, Ellen Parkin and a lively script make this sea of love a smooth ride to sail on. A great rental, you get a defining feel of the 1980s through this 80s crime drama that takes place in New York City. A killer is on the loose and all the victims are men who enter personal ads. John Goodman and Al Pacino as good detectives decide that setting themselves up on dates with half of New York is the way to catch the female assailant.

The conversations are so immersed in the colloquial and big on minor details that you get lost in the eighties. A couple of steamy scenes and off-beat allusions also make the script a viable one. The film dares to cross a few lines and does not worry about being politically correct.

Al Pacino is superb and this is one of the few movies in which he does not have his now trademark soliloquies. John Goodman has to date be in a movie that is not entertaining. The man is a great film picking genius. He is superb, as well. As we creep into the dates and the alcoholism and New York City in 1989, the movie has a lot of tension going for it. There is a lot of fun to be had while on a murder case and even more interesting are the little wrongdoings of otherwise good men. 3 out of 5.

[Merchant of Venice]

The anti-semitism is strong in the canals of a spotless Venice city. Jews are treated like scum but are necessary to carry on daily business. Oh come now, you've all read the Shakespearean classic in high school or a humanities class somewhere, have you not? Well the story goes that being in the business of loaning money is dirty and it's only meant for people who aren't very good people at all - and that is in this case - the Jews. Al Pacino plays Shylock, the man who has only one thing on his mind - interest with a side dish of vengeance. He feels that he has been betrayed long enough and that he should take a man's flesh pound for pound, for the money he is owed.

A nice journey through Venice with incantations of sweetness mingling with filthy racist slurs make for a nice jambalaya of dialogue. And of course, as is the case with any film based on Shakespeare's work, many times you will hear the dialogue rhyming but at other times, it will not make any sense.

A lowly man with a rich noble of a friend asks for money from Shylock. With this money, he plans on courting a beautiful princess, whom he must win only with his pure heart and not the gold he used to impress her in the first place. For those of you who this is getting confusing for - think of Aladdin when he pretends to be Prince Abubu to win the hand of princess Jasmine in marriage. And just like Princess Jasmine, the princess in Merchant is a wise one (much wiser as you see towards the end) and cares not for all the riches in the world, but a heart pure and a love true. Things of that sort.

In the midst of the romance comes a slap back to reality; that being the merchant's conquests on the seas have failed and Shylock wants a piece of his flesh. Definitely a crescendo of a film. 3 out of 5.

[Walk the Line]

Enigmatic from front to start, the man in black captures us all. That was intentional rhyming. Johnny Cash is portrayed as the original bad boy. His antics - however "un-Christian" are fun to watch and his love affair with June Carter is the sweetest when acknowledged and violent when unrequited. "Ring of Fire" the song Cash sings and the one that is written by June Carter Cash - a twice divorced Country Hall of Fame Superstar (The Carter Family) - explains their love affair perfectly. They fall deeper and deeper into the ring of fire and the flames keep getting higher.

What many will be surprised by is the amazing job with which Reese Witherspoon has captured the essence of June; a truly Oscar worthy performance. Joaquin Phoenix delivers Cash with utmost sincerity from the moment we see him waiting to go on stage at Folsom prison to the crowd of adoring convicts.

The film covers several songs - all which are sung by Phoenix & Witherspoon - and add a bit of "Behind the Scenes" feel to it all. Undoubtedly a great watch. 4 out of 5.

[Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]

Director Mike Newell's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire brings to the audience the darkest film yet in the series. A seriously terrifying adventure ride that will leave you in the center of the conflicts Harry faces in the fourth year. We get a good glimpse of the tournament and everything else takes second place.

The Triwizard tournament is a competition that guarantees "eternal glory" in the Wizarding world. The contestants face challenges such as fire breathing dragons and various sea creatures. Harry Potter who does not meet the age-requirements of the tournament finds out that his name has been entered into the Goblet. In a rare moment we see Harry actually frightened when his name is pulled from the Goblet.

The year at Hogwart's also features a bunch of romantic developments amongst our favorite wizards and witches. There are priceless and quite charming moments of innuendo exchanged between several of the usually more conserved characters. Ron, Harry, & Hermione all have their shares of crushes & first encounters with love in quite entertaining form. The Goblet gets a 4 out of 5.

[Capote]

The reason art exists is mainly for two reasons, the audience's demand and the artist's burning desire to create. Capote was a writer who worked to achieve greatness, who wrote to keep his ego burning. Philip Seymour Hoffman as Capote shows us an author who worked by having a cognizance of self better than most of his closes critics, friends, and admirers. It was his massive self centered nature - during the premiere party of the film "To Kill a Mockingbird" penned by his close friend Nelle Harper Lee (Catherine Keener), Capote says "frankly I don't know what the fuss is all about" while wasting away in another gin and tonic.

A quiet and mostly unevenful biographical motion picture event, Capote reaches few points of absolute chilling climaxes which make the rest of the film seem like the quiet before the storm.

The film takes place at the juncture of Capote's life as he embarks on writing his most famous novel, "In Cold Blood." A creative non-fiction - many say he popularized or even invented the genre - about a small town murder. In order to get close to the murderers, Capote goes as far as hiring a new lawyer to delay the death sentence on the heads of the two men accused of the gruesome murder. Capote befriends one of the criminals (Clifton Collins Jr.) who at a point thinks his friend Truman is there to save his life. As the story unravels the friendship fades into a grey area which is one of the most interesting dynamics in the film to watch.

The film sheds light on the selfish nature of the process of creation. And we are given an Oscar-worthy performance by both Philip Seymour Hoffman and Clifton Collins Jr. Capote is not a cursory look at an author, but an honest stare at a man creating his career defining piece. 3 out of 5.

[The Ballad of Jack and Rose]

There's a touch of realism in this film that cannot be faked. It is a truly daring movie in the subjects it addresses and a very difficult one to swallow at times. But portrayed absolutely beautifully, the two main characters are a daughter and a sick father (Daniel Day Lewis) who live on what used to be a commune of idealists. A touching yet sometimes disagreeable piece about a man and his daughter who live on the memories of a commune.

The memories that remain are the only good things left for these two, being that their mother and wife are dead and their commune is now almost non-existent. A truly revolutionary couple, they take on villains in the form of developers who plan on building land around their picture perfect coastal habitat. But the heart of the conflict comes when someone tears in between their love; in the face of a woman and her two sons.

A very isolated life has made the daughter into what you could see the father have being at a younger age, when he was still a stronger man and one with support on his side. But she is strong, luminous, and also cunning. These traits combined with childlike innocence and unquestioned determination bring a very aggressive and never before seen presence to the screen. A well written and thought out emotional conundrum. 4 out of 5.

[Good Night, and Good Luck.]

George Clooney as director shows that he is very eager to get his hands behind the camera, but he also shows the telltale signs of a kid let loose in a candy store. In this, a beautiful black and white film, Clooney takes us to an era where television had not become yet become one of the most trusted sources of news for the world. A time when Edward R. Murrow was seen as someone who would talk to puffy guests such as Liberace and other Hollywood celebrities, but not someone with substance.

David Strathairn plays the bold hero at the center of this documentary like film and he does so with an inspirational force. The film see-saws between fact, excitement, and poor excuses to show plumes of cigarette smoke in a black & white picture. Clooney goes out of his way to give us close-ups of television screens and to make the film raw and inspired, but in doing so, comes away with a script that could leave the average filmgoer in yawns.

The film is about the emergence of the junior senator from Wisconsin, McCarthy. It's about McCarthy's lies and his power. We are witness to his campaign to find Communists living in the United States and holding Congressional hearings to denigrate and punish them for their rumored acts of treason. While many in that era stood up against McCarthy, Edward R. Murrow is credited, at least according to this picture, as the man who really lights the match to McCarthy's downfall. The film, while great for historians and those who enjoy black and white films can be extremely boring if not interested in the subject matter to begin with. An unenthusiastic 3 out of 5.

[Oldboy]

A stylistic, violent, psychological thriller, Oldboy is one of the most disturbing movies I have seen to date. The content which cannot be disclosed without revealing some plotline is a combination of a daytime talk show and something ancient Greece could produce. The film starts out with our very comedic protagonist locked up in a drunk tank. Cursing the police officers, talking to them indignantly, flipping them off, and trying to physically harm them. Finally, a friend helps him get out of this mess and he phones home to his daughter whose 3rd birthday it is that Daddy's on his way home. We turn around and he has vanished. On a rainy night, he is gone and the next we see him, he is imprisoned in an apartment, hypnotized perhaps, and has his life snatched away from him for a period of 15 years, when he is finally released.

Who? Why? These questions are answered through the remainder of the film and are done satisfactorily enough - though a bit of stretching maybe required for certain viewers. The sequences of fights is very naturally done, it's reminiscent of Mean Streets - though the protagonist is always seen as the strongest - the fighting is believable and nothing like Asian cinema of the Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon type.

The film truly works every muscle in your mind by not revealing everything, but slowly unfolding into what finally turns out to be an uncomfortable denoument. The acting is of the finest degree and the editing and direction take you through a warped world filled with elements you do not want to have revealed. A beautifully composed nightmare. 4 out of 5.

[House of D]

David Duchovny's first film as a director is a flashback story with some great highlights and interesting moments. The film has more bicycles in a movie than a documentary about Lance Armstrong, and appropriately starts out on a Paris night. The struggle of a man who has a hidden past and the excitement of finally being able to share his secrets with those he cares about is clearly portrayed in that first bike ride. As the book opens on Tommy, played by Duchovny as an older man, and played even better by Anton Yelchin in the flashback, we start to learn about life in Greenwich Village in the 70s.

A series of cold events in Tommy's life lead to his eventual breakdown, but with the help of his friend Pappas, a retarded janitor (Robin Williams) & a woman who speaks to Tommy from her prison cell (Erykah Badu), Tommy learns about love and life. It is definitely not a typical film about the popular subjects that movies tend to be about, but sometimes it feels like we're given a gloss coat with an empty shell. The film does not delve as deeply into the soul of conflict as it could.

But, Duchovny does a fine job of showing us the Village in 1970s and a good feel for why the story needs to be told now. 3 out of 5.

[3 Iron]

Korean writer and director Ki-duk Kim presents us with one of the most original pieces of storytelling in cinema since his last Western success, Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter And . . . Spring. 3 Iron revolves around a young post modernist, humane, and symbolic man who makes himself a guest in strangers' homes while they are away on vacation.

Obviously he encounters a multitude of different experiences, and to add to the innocuous nature of his breaking and entering, he washes the clothes of all those whose houses he inhabits. Staying in this course, he winds up befriending a lovely young woman and she becomes his accomplice. The only problem - she is married.

Truly engaging sequences of adventure and intrigue will infect your mind as you watch the film. The directing is charming and haunting. The protagonist is faced with some harsh challenges but the way in which he handles his conflicts is one of the most inventive and sublime manners of attacking a problem to date in any film I have watched.

I realized that I loved this movie when the following became clear; 3 Iron will make you think that you, personally, as a human being can accomplish much more than you may have tried to; and maybe even inspire you to become more agile. When a film can convince you to get up off your ass and do something (very similar to SSFWAS), then it's definitely worth a peek. 5 out of 5.

[Les Choristes]

A beautiful French countryside and a plot similar to a combo of Heaven Help Us & Sister Act 2 make Les Choristes, while entertaining and enchanting, overall nothing thrilling. We follow the story of a group of boys in boarding school with a strict headmaster. Strict, but often times, extremely hilarious in his hatred and dismissal of all things pure and sweet.

To the rescue is a kind old man who has an interest in singing. Through songs and an organized chorus, he is able to shake up the establishment's misguided entirehe is able to manipulate French countryside who all have parents that pretty much want to distance themselves from their children - or in some cases - just no parents at all. The singing is especially beautiful and some of the conflicts that these boys deal with are very simple, but make it all the more fun to watch. For once, you're not expecting grave tragedy to fall upon your favorite characters. But, while mostly generic and predictable in plot, there are still some surprises and laughs that make Les Choristes very enjoyable. 3 out of 5.

[A History of Violence]

Tom Stalls is your average heartland citizen. He owns a diner, knows everyone around town, and likes to live the quiet life. David Cronenberg's documentary-like title is appropriate for the film because while you feel for the characters, the title constantly jabs at your skull - reminding you that a tremendous act of violence will be followed by the intervals of conversation. Everything leads up to the violence in the film and it is interesting to watch. But from the first cruel death in the scene to the gruesome and gory ones - one reaction was common - laughter.

When Tom Stalls is attacked by two "badmen" at his diner, he commits serious acts of violence by killing them both; in turn protecting the patrons and employees of the establishments and also ruining his entire life.

The film will have you laughing throughout because it is so intense at points, that it will be the only reaction you can draw upon. Though it is common for one to leave reality behind when entering the movie theater, the scene that is painted is so normal and Partridge family like, that you cannot but help laugh when the mob comes to town and wants Tom Stalls to admit to a past life he wants to leave in his past.

Viggo Mortenson and Maria Bello do a tremendous job of acting, but the script sometimes lends itself to be completely ridiculous. When Tom's son finds out that he may have used to be a part of the mob, he asks him, something along the lines of "Oh, what are you going to wack me if I tell [sister] that you're in the mob?" Though it's there for obviously comedic reasons, parts of the film just become unintentionally hilarious.

The movement of the film is in a very late 80s, early 90s feel, though it revolves around the characters, it's almost as if these characters are big symbols walking around trying to prove Cronenberg's point that violence has a cause and effect. It is painful to watch the acts of violence being committed, but you also will just be thankful that the film had some resolution to it. 2.7 out of 5.

[Proof]

This John Madden film about mathematicians and their tendencies to be a bit off the rocker is a silent triumph. It weaves intricate plot with questions of trust and sanity. We are taken into the life of a man who constantly claims that intelligence, as it relates to the scholarly world of mathematics peaks at 23 and everything is down hill from there. Anthony Hopkins does a tremendous job but it is Gwyneth Paltrow, who plays Hopkins' daughter in the movie, whose issues the film revolves around.

A brilliant, passionate, and deeply caring person, Gwyneth's character has a tremendous amount of conflict within her and that's what makes it intense. She has to ward off her own sister and prove her sanity to those around her. Many also doubt her credibility since she has lived for 5 years with her insane and dying father.

The city of Chicago is shot in way that has not been seen before. In order to get all the math proofs that are discussed, a lot of angular, quick-paced, pans in motion take place. It leaves you with a complete feeling of engaging inside the world of Gwyneth Paltrow's mind. She takes on her role with great accuracy as we see a fragile, unstable, post-graduate genius trying to maintain a balance between academia and the world. We see her at her most vulnerable stage in life and it is endearing. 3 out of 5.

[Junebug]

Junebug is a sweet film with great heart and has a homegrown feel to it. Director Phil Morrison's film revolves around a newly married couple who go to visit the husband's family down south. George seems a bit more refined than his hillbilly family down south and his art-gallery owner wife, Madeline is ironically the reason of their visit back to his home in North Carolina. While Madeline is down scoping a new emerging artist, deep rooted family troubles that have never quite been resolved emerge - all capped with a very pregnant and about to burst Ashley (Amy Adams).

Amy Adams is wonderful in the film. Ashley is a neurotic, hyper, talkative, self-doubting, and incredibly sweet and understanding woman. She talks like a teenager in love and has the innocence of one. Ashley's purity is shown through her actions and selfless acts. And you realize that you're watching a film only when you realize that we all wish we were like Ashley but somewhere along the way, we grew older, and our values fell apart.

The film is filled with great music too - an original score by Yo La Tengo and Christian hymns portrayed in a non-sarcastic manner. Junebug makes you feel like you're sitting down south, sipping a glass of sweet iced tea while watching life from an old creaky chair on the front porch. 4 out of 5.

[The Constant Gardener]

After the success of City of God, director Fernando Meirelles brings to life an authentic thriller with The Constant Gardener. There is a global conspiracy that has caused many deaths and plaguing the African content. The film gains its momentum through the journey of Justin Quayle (Ralph Fiennes) who will stop at nothing to expose the dirt that becomes the reason for his wife's (Rachel Weisz) murder.

The sound and music of the film throb as we are taken through African slums and vast desert planes. The shooting style Fernando Meirelles uses is very similar to City of God and we are left questioning whether what is on screen is a documentary or a film. Add to that an extremely fine-tuned group of actors, and you have an intelligent thriller. 3 out of 5.

[The Brothers Grimm]

The genre of a movie is something that should be paid close attention to, because if you're not sticking to it in a certain graded fashion, chances are you'll come out with an array of different genres all working against one another. The Brothers Grimm has a specatcular story at its base, but with the screenplay being cheesy and too colloquialized for the American palette, the film falls apart.

Heath Ledger's attempt at acting comes off as a poor impersonation of Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean. Matt Damon has nothing to work off of and never reaches a point where we can see him as the hero of the film. Brothers Grimm tried to mix comedy, with horror, drama, and romance. None of the genres worked because it seemed that the actors were just throwing out lines instead of being involved with the film.

The film's sets were interesting and there were some great sequences with the use of crows and geese. But, as the age old saying goes; birds don't make good movies, people do. We start off by seeing the Brothers Grimm practicing their trade, which is bringing to life mythical witches and creatures through stagecraft to supersitious villagers and then of course exorcising that which they create.

Matt Damon's character is a firm believer in science and Heath Ledger is attached to folklore. With their powers of imagination and science, they move from town to town hoodwinking the 18th century populace in Germany. To the backdrop of this story is added French occupation in Germany [read: confused genre]. We have conflicts between the French and Germans addressed and they are given no justice or attention whatsoever. What results are a terrible combination of incoherent French & Italian accents and characters that are more annoying than Jar Jar Binks from Star Wars.

A wonderful idea at the heart of it, but I don't think director Terry Gilliam had a clue as to what he wanted the end result to look like. 2 out of 5.

[The Aristocrats]

A documentary about one joke that has circled the comedy world for ages, this film has a one track mind that lasts for its entirety. It works. The joke is about a man going into an agent's office and telling the agent, "Hey, I've got a great act for you." The agent asks, "Well, what is it?" The man replies, "Well it's a family act, myself and my wife and our children go on stage and take off our clothes." The agent says, "Well, that's one hell of an act, what do you call yourselves?" The man replies, "The Aristocrats."

This joke has full reign when it comes to adding your own scatalogical to it. We see comedians like George Carlin, Gilbert Gottfried, Robin Williams, Whoopi Goldberg, and Phyllis Diller give their versions of the joke. To hear comedians like Bob Saget and characters like Cartman from South Park do this joke is absolutely enchanting and disturbing on so many levels. The film is a definite stay-at-home kind of thing, but if you want to laugh with a big audience on your side, it will add to the fun. Even though the punchline is not that hilarious, the Aristocrats is a feel good movie that will have you in a good mood, for sure. 3 out of 5.

[The Reception]

Writer and Director James G. Young's entry into the Tribeca Film Festival had great potential that was dissolved mainly because of the performances. An estranged mother and daughter re-unite in a snowy setting. But, things are not as clear as they seem. A part of the charm of the film's clean and wintry canvas. But the primary focus is on the secrets that lie within each person's life. An interesting aspect that is brought out in the film is that of an alcoholic divorceé who has turned into a man hating machine. She spews forth vile insults towards all men in an atrocious French accent - all the while living with a gay man to feel comforted.

The story takes many turns as the week progresses and a great drama and some controversial scenes definitely make the movie something to talk about. An interesting story, weakened by the performances. 1.2 out of 5.

[Broken Flowers]

Jeffrey Wright gives an excellent comedic performance as Don's (Bill Murray) fertile Ethiopian neighbor, Winston in Jim Jarmusch's Broken Flowers. The film is about Don - a bachelor who has made a fortune from some business dealing with computers. His latest fling has left him alone sitting on a couch, when all his questions regarding life are answered, in the form of a pink letter with red writing - and a typed letter saying that he has a son.

The quest to find the son's mother begins appropriately with a burned CD whipped up by Winston, who is playing detective and sympathetic neighbor. The soundtrack of the film is absolutely perfect featuring what seem to be two tracks from an Ethiopian band's collection. The music of the film moves us along for an interesting ride, but then is cut off abruptly by several fade to blacks. There are chops of Broken Flowers where I'm confused as to what Jim Jarmusch wants us to see if anything. A lot of it seems to be filler material with no purpose.

In the middle of some great performances, a lacking script drags the film along and a choppy edit job does even more damage. A good weekend rental when it comes out on DVDs, 2.5 out of 5.

[Pretty Persuasion]

Satanic ritual abuse refers to the belief that an organized network of Satanists engages in brainwashing and abusing victims, especially children. In the 1980s hundreds of cases of satanic ritual abuse popped up in America. Children from California to New Jersey were accusing adults of engaging in organized Satanic ritual abuse. When they told the prosecuting parties involved for the cases, there was not a doubt raised that these children would be lying. To date, many prosecutors will defend the children. But all along, as the cases continue to be overturned in favor of the less lovable looking defendants, it was proven that the children were lying. In one form or another, we have all seen cases of sexual harassment displayed in the media. Most of the time, we are sympathetic with the victims and rightfully so, but sometimes we're shown how our sympathies are completely uncalled for. When we think about the prosecutions that occurred in the Salem Witch trials because a town full of people called some women witches, we are quick to forget that the Satanic Ritual Cases happened just in the last decade or so.

And the reason in addition to sociological, psychological, and historical circumstances of why we're prone to believing the lies, however incredulous they may seem? The harbingers of such atrocious news are nearly perfect beings whom we love to protect. People who can do no wrong. People - who when looked upon - bring apple pie to your mind. Take that innocence, douse it with the sex appeal of Lolita on aphrodisiacs, and splash it with a Beverly Hills address and a neat pink bow on the hair and you have the lead character of Kimberly played by Evan Rachel Wood in Pretty Persuasion.

The film crosses boundaries that I thought would not be touched for another 20 years or so, at least not in an R-rated movie. James Woods takes the cake for being a totally inappropriate, outrageously funny, and yet somehow rational man in the film. The sex talk is open, the accusations fly, the mud is slung, and boy oh boy is innocence completely shattered in so many levels within this movie. Evan Rachel Wood. Evan Rachel Wood. Evan Rachel Wood. The things she does in this movie make you forget that she is acting. It's amazing what her role called for and even more amazing that she pulled it off without a twitch and almost without a tear.

There was a bit of trouble convincing with some of the plot, but so what. The film has created a world that we have skirted in movies like Election & KIDS, but with the use of its Barbie's dream house exterior, Pretty Persuasion gets away with a lot and you'll like it for that reason. Beware, the movie may induce heart attacks in those who have daughters of their own. 3 out of 5. [to discuss this movie in further detail, do not hesitate to holler back]

[Mr. Deeds Goes to Town]

As a person who appreciates Adam Sandler's antics, I would like to preface this review by saying that I really enjoyed the Happy Madison production of Mr. Deeds. Frank Capra's 1936 original comedy, Mr. Deeds goes to town about that "jolly good Longfellow" was a bit too dated for my taste. But, that is not to say that there weren't humorous moments in the film. It is never wise to compare a remake to its original, especially since Mr. Deeds held a lot more meaning to the public watching it during the Great Depression.

Gary Cooper plays Mr. Deeds Longfellow, a postcard poet who has inherited $20 million. But instead of splurging it away, he thinks to invest it for the poor and give them the chance to develop on their own. There are great messages within the film and seeing that it was made during the Depression, it was probably received with great positivity and gave the suffering public much needed hope.

But, in this day in age, when looking at the film from a purely entertainment point of view - there are many moments that are given too much importance when they seemed to only be throw aways. 2.5 out of 5.

[Hustle & Flow]

It's hard out there for a pimp. It's hard for the masses to see any type of hero in the lead character DJay played by Terence Howard. DJay has a lot of rhythm and it was clearly portrayed in his southern hip hop twang, as he philosophized the street life to his prostitutes and anyone who he needed to sell. There was a lack of enough conflict in the meat of the film to create any tension in the audience.

The film is filled with excellent performances all around. Terence Howard is the obvious charmer, followed by Anthony Anderson as a 9 to 5 producer with a dream. But if awards were being handed out the clear winner would have to be Taraji P. Henson, who plays a pregnant prostitute with an amazing sweetness and loveliness about her. Julia Roberts couldn't have accomplished what Taraji P. Henson delivered with such ease in Hustle & Flow - which was making a pregnant prostitute the most likable person on screen.

But, in the end, the film just doesn't connect in the way that would make one get out of the seat and want to root for it. 2.3 out of 5.

[Brooklyn Bound]

While delivering a few realistic action sequences here and there, Rich Devaney's feature film debut is ultimately brought down by the stereotypically written script. The story is based on many urban and drug-related tragedies including a very lame crew of mobsters.

There are definitely some memorable shots taken, but there is a lack of chemistry between much of the crew. But, some of the action is very realistic, therefore intense and at times frightening. If the realism that was portrayed in the brawls was carried forward to the soul of the characters, Devaney's debut would have received much praise. 2 out of 5.

[Charlie and the Chocolate Factory]

We see Charlie's family living in a cartoonishly crooked house where there is not even a complete roof that covers their heads. For dinner, the mother prepares cabbage soup - an obviously unpleasant choice for dinner. A firm and audible "Ewww" came from the audience as this dish was served up to Charlie's family. The little girl in the theater was clearly not a fan - which induced even more laughter in the audience. Tim Burton's remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a place where imagination is truly brought to life. A place that has realized dreams that you've had.

An amazing composition of shapes, colors, effects, and music, Charlie is a spectacular achievement, even for Burton. What will shock most people is how funny this movie is. In the midst of the poverty and dreadful conditions Charlie is living in, Burton is able to make us laugh heartily and laugh throughout the film. Johnny Depp is fantastic as Willy Wonka. For all those people who say "Oh we've seen the original and are big fans of it." Give it a rest. You will not be angry at the remake, you will not be disappointed at the remake. You will love the remake and you will buy it on DVD and recommend it to family and friends.

Deep Roy is one of the keys of the many layers of freakiness. Johnny Depp is the other. Deep plays all of the Oompah Loompahs; little workers who crave nothing more for wages than cocoa beans. Depp plays a self-made chocolatier, an inventor, and a freaking weirdo. Many people have said that Depp played the character like Michael Jackson and I personally did not see an ounce of M.J. in the character. Depp's Willy Wonka is full of wonder, mystery, awkwardness, hilarity, and a stubborn child-like demeanor. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a true treat to watch. The special effects don't seem like they're effects at all and that's what makes them enjoyable. 4.5 out of 5.

[Modigliani]

Modigliani takes us into the fictionalized art scene of Paris when Picasso, Diego Rivera, Modigliani and a few other big shots were in it to win it, as they say. The center of the film is a gross and almost violent rivalry between Modi & Picasso. Not being an art connosieur, I was able to enjoy the cinematography and director's constant use of dark and light. There were also a few surreal touches added to the film that made it a cinematic success.

But there were also some flaws. One flaw was French actress Elsa Zylberstein, who just did not converse her feelings and emotions as strongly as some of the other actors in the film. She is an important part of the film because most of Modigliani's work are her portraits.

None of the characters are likable in Modigliani and there are some battles fought with drugs and alcohol that are almost pathetic to watch. Though at times Modigliani came off as a pretentious and almost stereotypical vision of the art world in Paris, it did have some notable scenes. 2.6 out of 5.

[Junky Punky Girlz]*

This 11-minute short film was made in 1996 by filmmaker Nisha Ganatra. There are several messages delivered in this black and white short, and looks like it was shot on 16 mm, but I could be wrong. An NYU student film, it achieves highly emotional and true moments within the 11-minute-running time. The camera truly captures every single important frame. An absolute joy to watch and superbly directed. 4.1 out of 5.

[Rope]

Rope is Alfred Hitchcock's first movie in color and his debut as an independent director and producer. The entire film was made on one sound stage in the Warner Brothers lot - shot in 10 minute takes - and meticulously planned so that Hitch could maintain his stylistic excellence.

Though the directing is great in the film and it is shot extremely well - it falls short of being a truly engaging thriller. Hitchcock has always been a fan of revealing the secret to the audience before the characters in the film themselves know the truth. In this film, he is no different and we are left guessing which character will figure out the crime.

Though it is true that you can do a lot with just one sound stage, a lot of different camera movements and angles, it does not make for a complete story. Rope was delicious to watch as a filmmaker, but lame to watch as a fan of mysterious thrillers. 2.8 out of 5.

[Crazy Like a Fox]

The Delphi Film Foundation brings to life a film that seems like it should be aired during sessions of the Congress when topics of historic preservation are on the agenda. It is a stirring and extremely unique film that focuses on one man's quest to save his historic Virginian farmhouse. He feels a natural bond to the earth and will do anything to stay on the land his ancestors grew up on - which becomes a part of the reason for the title.

Writer and director Richard Squires makes a bold statement with his debut feature. He has a very good eye and a genuine love of the landscape and topic he covers. Some of the acting was weak, but the strong performance by Richard Rees is enough to keep your attention. 2.9 out of 5.

[Elevator to the Gallows]

Louis Malle's 1957 film noir classic has been re-released and restored by Rialto Pictures and it is definitely a great treat for cinema-lovers. It is known as having catapulted Jeanne Moreau's career to international fame and it is a pleasure watching her ascension into the limelight.

The plot is in keeping with classic film noir, where a woman is at the center of all conflicts. Other aspects of film noir that fans of the genre will appreciate are the use of beautifully orchestrated music. The soundtrack is composed by none other than Miles Davis. As the plot thickens, the smoke rises, the tension rises, the music plays wonderfully with each frame. And the sound is very limited; you will only hear sound effects made in the studio and dialogue. There is absolutely zero ambient sound present throughout this very controlled experience.

There is a visually complex scene that takes place in the elevator which seems simple to the audience. But in it, you are witness to a man in an elevator. Just this one scene is so dynamic to watch and makes you not want to take any sort of a leave from the screen. You know from watching it, that this was a work of passion and care.

There is a sort of joy in letting yourself go at the movies. A joy of watching things unfold on a large screen where you have no control over what's happening, but yet want control of every decision made by the characters in the film. Elevator to the Gallows will make you forget everything and enter the lives of the characters it creates. That and it will turn you into a Louis Malle fan. 4.2 out of 5.

[War of the Worlds]

On October 30, 1938, there was a small scare and the power of the media was first felt by a part of the United States. Most Americans were turned into the radio listening to a show - but as they turned the dial - they heard what sounded like an emergency news report. The news report was actually Orson Welles' radio adaptation of the H.G. Wells novel, "War of the Worlds," in which martians attacked the earth. As a result hundreds of families in New Jersey fleed their homes in search for safe shelter thinking that the martians were actually coming.

On the July 4th long weekend in 2005, Steven Spielberg's adaptation of the H.G. Wells novel hit the theaters, starring Tom Cruise and Dakota Fanning. Welles, Wells, Spielberg, and Cruise; these are all some heavy-hitting names and the only reason why millions of fans dished out their hard earned dollars at the box office this weekend. What did they see when they got there? A whole lot of special effects, an amazing job of narration by Morgan Freeman and a film with no heart. Nothing was scary about the movie, there were no new action sequences, no amazing special effects and yawn worthy acting.

I'll be the first to admit, I have not read the novel. I have, however, listened to the entire radio play that sent hundreds fleeing from their homes, clutching onto their loved ones in search for shelter. Spielberg's movie falls short of many people's expactations. With an epic and daunting title of War of the Worlds, I had expectations to be frightened and left googly eyed at the end of this summer blockbuster. Unfortunately, laughter, discomfort, and ambivalence were my immediate reactions.

There were several special effects in the movie and some of them were interesting, but they were not worth gasping over. A mediocre film - if that - War of the Worlds has a lot of flash and a lot of marketing without the heart. It is a sure miss. There is nothing praiseworthy about the film. Not the acting, not the special effects, not the screenplay, not the music, not the sound effects, not the lighting, not the sets, not the directing. Everything is average or far below. 1.2 out of 5.

[Batman Begins]

Batman Begins at the end of this film. He is officially reborn as you may have heard, read, or seen. Christopher Nolan has done an incredible job of reviving the character of Bruce Wayne and the Dark Knight. The Scarecrow as a villain in this film works like Darth Maul did in the Star Wars franchise; cool make-up, little to be afraid of ... even though he is the Scarecrow. But that makes sense when you look at the fact that Scarecrow was merely a pawn of the incredibly well-crafted villain Ras Al-Ghul.

Katie Holmes not only does not add to this film being good, the newest member of the church of Scientology almost takes away some of Batman Begins' well-deserved praise. Besides the one-liner jokes that seem a bit out of place in this well-crafted dark masterpiece, Batman Begins is what fans and non-fans of the DC Comics hero have been waiting for. An awesomely designed Gotham City, a truly well-executed origin story, you will leave the movie theater wanting to watch the sequel.

The music is not composed by Danny Elfman, which is one of my main qualms with the film. The Danny Elfman Batman theme has become so signature and so completely synonymous with the Caped Crusader that anything else seems almost demeaning. But while watching the film, you will not notice the absence of Elfman's score. Written & Directed to near perfection, with some inconsistent and odd edits, 3.9 out of 5.

[LOST - TV Show]

Appropriately titled television shows, films, and books make everyone happy. When you name something and the title does not reflect the content of that thing which has been produced, a lot of people become unhappy. Lost is very appropriately named and just as its name, it explores a bunch of stranded people on an island. Now, what many people would think by that scenario immediately is that "Oh, it's been done." If you think that, you would be more than wrong, you'd be commiting one of the gravest mistakes of your life and exposing your ignorance of television shows to everyone around you.

Over the past two weeks, I watched the entire season of LOST. There were nights that turned into mornings more often than I care to mention. I watched anywhere from 2-4 episodes each night and was always wishing to cover up my eyes out of fear. LOST captures the essential Hitchcock technique of keeping the audience in suspense by not showing but hinting at things. For the duration of the entire first season of the hit ABC-show, you are always waiting for another secret to be revealed or better yet, turned into yet another series of enigmas.

Lost has a lot of meanings as it relates to the show's characters which range from drug junkies, doctors, and people who do not speak English. The characters are all stranded on an island - lost from civilization. Many of the characters have a purpose and are lost as in they lack direction in life. They also experience loss of friends, family, and material things. Not only that, but there is loss of memory, loss of sensibility, loss of everything.

The show also has the ability to resonate an absolutely chillingly intense feeling of fear into the viewer. Even the "light" parts of this dark saga take an incredible amount of courage to watch. There are several sequences where you will surely jump out of your seat, but most of the terror stays within your mind hours after you've witnessed the scary events on screen. The people on the island are faced with terrible foes and what makes them even more daunting is that you never see them. You may hear them or hear of them or sense them - but you will not be able to see them.

LOST has captured within it, a distinct place in television. It respects the viewer and that is why anyone who has seen 2 episodes in-consequential order will agree that LOST gets a 5 out of 5.

[Me and You and Everyone We Know]

By A. Venesky

Multimedia artist Miranda July’s debut film seems to be either loved or hated, depending on how well viewers receive her attempts to bring a playful but artsy observational sensibility into the film.

The film is a series of loosely interwoven vignettes held sort-of together by the awkward romantic pursuit of a divorced shoe salesman named Richard by a struggling artist named Christine, played by July. While there are some amusing, funny bits, there’s no real motivation for why the characters do what they do, the relationship between Richard and his two sons who are afraid of him, is not clear. As a result, July’s characters don’t seem to be real. Rather, they’re vehicles that carry out her whimsical suspension of reality on screen. As a consequence, when July does try to evoke a more serious emotional tone, her characters look almost ridiculous.

Excellent performances, however, were put in by John Hawkes, who portrays the oddly-handsome but scruffy Richard, and by Brandon Ratcliff, who plays Richard’s 6-year-old son Robby— an unwitting participant in an online sex-chat flirtation (one of the more enjoyable
bits).

Finally, I’m fairly tired of female leads stirred mainly by dreams of a husband and a big house in the American suburban wasteland, as July’s Christine is. I was a bit disappointed that July, who I expected
to be a little more kiddie-porn-chic didn’t really challenge Hollywood’s
usual use of female leads. I give Me and You 2 out of 5. But I think that if you like chick-lit, you might give it a higher score than I did.

[Crash]

It is a shame that Crash came out the same time as Star Wars: Episode 3. Mostly because Crash could have been an Oscar contender if it was released closer to the Golden Globes. But that's all Hollywood politics.

Crash is a movie about humanity. People, living, breathing and thinking as you and me. People in America, people who see color, culture, and live from experience. It has real scenes, real locations, no gimmicks that play with time, special effects, or anything close to a summer blockbuster.

The movie deals with racism without fear, but there is no preaching. The message is delivered through actions and words. The ensemble cast is brilliantly put together and they carry the film with much respect for the words they speak.

As the lives of vulnerable people intertwine in Los Angeles, we have the absolute privilege of being drawn in, luckily from the safety of our seats. A soundly directed film which is unbelievably well written, Crash gets a 5 out of 5.

[A Love Song for Bobby Long]

In this housing bubble that we're living in currently, even the most amateur of real estate junkies will know that the value of the house is only as good as its location. The best location being by the water. What the tycoons don't realize is that women contribute just as much value to a house. And when you're around a bunch of raconteurs looking to write novels, the combination of water and women is a most ideal one.

John Travolta has given one of his best performances since Pulp Fiction in this little-heard of film. Scarlett Johansson's role is equally dazzling.

Besides the great acting, we are treated to beautiful vistas along the banks of many rivers with the sunlight as our guide. But, the matters of conflict which ideally drive films are sometimes misplaced and hence a bit too unbelievable. But the great acting will make you forget everything and swallow it all with a swig of bourbon. 3.5 out of 5.

[The Killing of a Chinese Bookie]

I watched this movie based on the recommendation of Christopher Moltisanti of the Sopranos. Better known in his non-fictional world as Michael Imperioli, he gave his seal of approval to this John Cassavetes classic.

Don't look for plot, don't look for any signs of intelligence when watching this movie. It's merely about the Strong, Silent Type. John Cassavetes is an impermeable man, so to speak. He owns a night club and has negotiating skills that could unite Arabs with Jews.

In the movie, he mainly uses his wit and haggling powers to steer away trouble from the mob. 2.9 out of 5. But 4 out of 5 if you're a fan of non-plot movies and tough-guy movies like Cool Hand Luke.

[Eat Drink Man Woman]

Are you familiar with a family in which most of the communication is done by feeding others and talking about food? No? Well, don't worry, Eat Drink Man Woman accomplishes this feat in an orchestral manner. A crescendo of madness ensues at the dinner table and the most serious parts of the movie are also the most hilarious.

Writer & Director Ang Lee did his homework before making this film. Parts of this 1994 independent film's score are actually the theme song from Sex & the City. Besides the music, which does not really ring any greater notes than the aforementioned salsa-like romp, we get a real good flavor of Taipei. Some may even book the next plane ticket over.

The movie's humor and depth are purest with the metaphors and between the line sequences. The analogies are unstretched and leave room for interpretation. The best part of the movie, and this does not ruin it for anyone is when the father says to one of his daughters "Daughter, I can taste your soup." A very touching 3 out of 5.

[Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith]

The ultimate battle of good versus evil has been the center of the Star Wars saga since its inception in the 70s. This George Lucas born phenomenon is an absolute pleasure to watch for avid fans as well as newly introduced audiences.

The excellent fight sequences along with unique planetary environments fills the movie with eye candy. The battle within one's own conscience fills the movie with truth. I found myself relating with young Skywalker himself more than any one of the characters. The man who becomes Lord Vader is someone we can all relate to.

It takes a very good film to be interesting even when you know how it all ends way beforehand. And Episode 3 accomplishes this. Yoda's dialogue is like hearing Buddha speak. Acting is terrible all around with the exception of Ewan McGregor's outstanding Obi Wan.

Episode 3 is the perfect beginning to this summer's line-up of flicks. The force hit me hard. 3.6 out of 5.

[Rounders]

Matt Damon, Edward Norton, John Malkovich, Martin Landau & my favorite John Turturro. They're all in Rounders. A movie about poker. At this time, it is a highly popular rental due to the fad of TV poker.

The script is weakly written, and though the stakes are high, it's nothing like Lock, Stock, & Two Smoking Barrels. The lacking part is a chemistry between all of the players.

2.5 out of 5.

[The Corporation]

Unlike Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, the Corporation is very just in its exploration of the corporate world. This film is an absolute must-see for individuals who respect businesses and the capitalistic way of life, but also maintain a strong sense of morality.

The entity of a Corporation is defined several times through this informative documentary, in the terms of different entities. The corporation, as seen by law, has the same rights as an individual. And as an individual, a corporation has the power to acquire and the power to multiply and diversify, the power to be sued and to sue. It even has the power to create, give birth to several things, to which life is not limited. The magnitude of power a corporation holds is public knowledge, but there are several hidden aspects, which this documentary illuminates that make it worth watching.

The Corporation defines best defines a corporation in terms of marine biology as a whale during feeding time. When a whale opens its giant mouth to intake a chunk full of seaweed, inevitably, it also engulfs within itself everything else surrounding and beside the seaweed. Marinate on that for 3 out of 5.

[Spanglish]

A lot of things happen in Spanglish. It is a family drama that reaches new levels of affection and beauty. But where it snatches your heart is with its absolutely fantastic realism. I was almost brought to tears from when the daughter of Adam Sandler's character was reading a restaurant review about her father.

Paz Vega and Adam Sandler are super cute. Every character is beautifully and wishfully well-spoken and neurotic. The ensemble works very well together. Some parts of the film are unnecessary and do not need to exist, but still you won't be angry for seeing them. The relationships are what make this movie believable and beautiful.

Adam Sandler's ability to be genuine is as great as his ability to make you laugh. Spanglish gets a Cuatro out of 5.

[Vera Drake]

Vera Drake is like watching a series of oil paintings come to life. It helps that human emotion is added to these oil painting like scenes. The film is absolutely a tearjerker, for those who cry at movies.

The acting is moving, but the directing is even more impressive. You are transported into 1950s England and if you weren't there for when it happened, you'll take this movie's depiction of it. There is something extremely cozy about the film that makes you feel that you've been invited to tea with the Drakes and the emotions are heightened because of it. Definitely a 4/5.

[The Interpreter]

Alfred Hitchcock did not gain permission from the United Nations to shoot on premises. So, Hitch went on without the real thing and engaged in what he did best, which was illumanating the screen with powerful cinematography and his personalized point of view on how landmarks and locations should look. That and he brought an eeriness & mystery along with exhilaration to the screen.

The Interpreter has within it, some very tense and curious moments, but they are very scarce. The rest of the movie is average. Though director Sydney Pollack gains full access to the United Nations to shoot this film, it feels like this movie went through 200 re-writes before finally coming up with a very predictable, glossy finish.

Sean Penn, one of the best actors Hollywood has to offer was not at the top of his game as a Secret Service agent. Someone should have reminded him that the top security men and women of the United States DO NOT CRY. They may do so in the privacy of their own homes while chopping onions with a machete, but outside of that, I doubt that secret service agents cry. 2.8 out of 5.

[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]

Zaphod, Trillian, Arthur, and Ford are all there. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is probably one of 5 books I've read in my life. So, to have it be made into a film was something I had looked forward to.

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy started out as a radio program on the BBC, as developed by Douglas Adams. Due to its popularity, Adams decided to transport the show into a series of books. After the books, the BBC made a horrible television show with atrocious special effects based on the radio program and on the book.

Adams, before he passed away, started working on the screenplay of the film and wanted to see it be made. After watching the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, I feel that readers should go watch this film because it will be enjoyable to attach specific scenes to memorable goings-on in the book. Everyone else should probably just sit this film out and read the book. The missing factors in the film are chemistry & rhythm. The special effects are good and some scenes blew me away, but again, if you have not read the book, they won't mean much to you.

With all the vastness of the galaxy, this film is about as bright as 2 tiny dying stars out of 5, not even close to 42.

[The Assassination of Richard Nixon]

It's not fair to compare a play to a movie. So, it is definitely out of the question to say that The Assassination of Richard Nixon combines two plays, one is Oswald's Backyard (an off-Broadway production which was running in 2004 in NYC) and the other is Death of a Salesman.

All stories are different. Even though they may tackle the same subjects, the same emotions and the same themes, they all came about due to different reasons and differ in their execution. Of course if plagiarism took place, none of that would be true, and the similarities would be inappropriate, immoral, and vulgar.

Going back, an off-Broadway play entitled Oswald's Backyard was about the life of Lee Harvey Oswald before his successful assassination of JFK. The Assassination of Richard Nixon is about Sam Bicke's life as an aspiring salesperson who is going through a messy separation with his wife.

Penn takes on the persona of Sam Bicke with great conviction, which leaves the audience mesmerized. The plot is carried out very effectively due to his excellent performance. Each sequence of events is captured perfectly; it's akin to watching an amazing, gravely serious and nervewracking reality TV show. Don Cheadle is also in the film and has an equally natural manner about him. Naomi Watts is in the film, but her character is easily forgettable. An excellent film with superb acting, as most sales related movies tend to be, The Assassination gets 3.95 out of 5 stars.

[The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou]

Mark Friedberg should start a school for all of Hollywood's aspiring Production Designers and he should give a free scholarship to the most needy; whoever did the production design for Batman Forever. The beyond imagination production design makes The Life Aquatic visually unsurpassed by any film made in the past 5 years. The film's sets are sophisticated, genius, and super detail oriented. Wes Anderson, writer & director of team Zissou, should start a writing & directing course for how to utilize good actors and have them develop huge yet muted personalities. He should start by re-teaching Joel Schumacher everything about directing. Joel is best known for taking the Batman franchise and draining it down a massive toilet.

I would recommend Steve Zissou to all who have lost hope in original comedy films, as generated by the Hollywood machine. The Life Aquatic will restore your faith in the power of cinema and forever embed a solemn respect for the arduous art of subtle humor in your heart.

Bill Murray is supported on screen by an all-star cast, including Owen Wilson, Angelica Huston, Willem Dafoe and Cate Blanchett. And if these people weren't enough, everyone's favorite oddball, Jeff Goldblum also has a role.

Steve Zissou is subtle and respectful to the audience's intelligence. You watch this movie and immediately you're being made into a puppet, who is in very talented and capable hands.

You'll laugh at unexpected intervals and if you're eating a bag of candy shaped like stars, you'll throw the 5 up in the air to show your love for the film.

[In Good Company]

I watched a scene from this movie be shot on West 3rd and Broadway last summer. After that wonderful moment, when the shot was complete and all the actors and crew scrammed away, only one person was left, Scarlett Johansson. We exchanged eye contact and later on in the same day a photo was taken of the Village, "Birds perched in the Village" (gallery).

So, the movie was not too well-written. Some of the roles were conveniently one or two dimensioned, including Ms. Johansson's portrayal of a freshman college student. There were rarely any memorable moments in the film. If more time was given to its script development, In Good Company could have gotten more than a 1.5 out of 5 rating.

[What the Bleep do we Know!?]

Have you got a grip on your Quantum self? Yeah? Neither has 99.9% of the human population. "Quantum Physics is the physics of possibilities," says Amit Goswami, Professor of Physics, University of Oregon, Senior Scholar in Residence at the Institute of Noetic Sciences.

The film explores Quantum physics through cheesy montages of special effects and a fictional narrative. In that sense, the documentary is very unique in its execution. The plot of the doc would most likely be labeled a demonstration or re-enactment on television. The acting is poor and that doesn't take anything away from the movie. The movie is able to get you thinking about the several concepts of quantum physics from the get go. But, yes they are simplefied and made available for mass consumption with a handful of butter laced popcorn and so the most brilliant of students or those who really know all about the subject matter could end up hating the movie.

Nil G, a student acquiring his phD in physics at Stanford University says "I hated it because a lot of it was just plain wrong."

But what about those of us who really crave a thoughtful flick? What the %$@# about us!? You can explore the truths and non-truths of the film later on if your researching skills are at the top of their game. But the discussions of God & love, in particular, as they relate to science are the most engaging portions of the film. And nothing beats a good conversation and being indulged in a bit of deep intellectual pleasure. The equation 3/5 is perfect for describing What the Bleep do we know!?

[The Human Stain]

Based on a Philip Roth novel, The Human Stain boasts an all star cast, with Nicole Kidman, Anthony Hopkins, and Gary Sinise. It's a well-shot film, with a poor editing job. There is no flow and the spectacular performances by Sinise and Hopkins (notice the absence of Ms. Kidman's name) are left unsupported by the rest of the film.

It's sad really. This could have been an Academy Award winning film had it not been for the poor adaptation of the novel. If pressed, I'd have to give this movie 1 star out of a possible 5. But I have not been pressed.

[The Yes Men]

The Yes Men is a documentary about the people who started the Web site gwbush.com. The site exposed the real truths behind the George W. Bush's political and corporate career. The site was under great scrutiny by the Bush administration who actually attempted to shut it down. W actually has one of the biggest and most impressionable lines in the entire documentary, in which he says that people should not have too much freedom.

So, after making George W. Bush speak the truth, The Yes Men started another Web site, gatt.org, which is dedicated to exposing all the wrongs done by the WTO. The problem is, many people visit gatt.org and think that it is the official site of the WTO. This results in the Yes Men being invited to tons of conferences and lectures. So, they take these opportunities and present in front of large crowds in a manner that they think is truthful of the WTO.

Obviously this results in some pretty entertaining stunts. In one of the lectures, The Yes Men as WTO representatives suggest recycling human feces and feeding it to third world country's labor force. Tongue in cheek, they make a point against the WTO. I'd just visit their Web site, www.theyesmen.org and looking at what they do on a daily basis rather than watch this film. So this film would only get a 2 out of 5 on the sizzle scale, 5 being super hot and sizzling 1 being defrosting in process.

[8 1/2]

Forget the Sopranos and Tony's issues with his mother. Forget the Godfather and Francis Ford Coppola's beautifully constructed scenes. Forget Annie Hall and its stream of consciousness content and daydream sequences that wowed audiences. In fact forget any movie you have ever watched and loved in your entire life. Now watch Fellini's "8 1/2" and rewatch all your favorites. You are guaranteed to find something; a shot, a character, the conflict between good and evil, the relationship of men with their women, that will have been clearly influenced by Fellini's masterpiece.

The last time I saw Fellini was at the Guggenheim here in New York City. Short clips from different segments of 8 1/2 played on 2 television screens. His storyboards were pressed against the glass to which my nose stayed glued. These drawings were not only artistic, but they were exact in their technical details, like artistic blueprints for visual bliss.

8 1/2 was made in 1963 and has been called by critics Fellini's best work. It's about a director who is unsure of the topic of his film. He's unsure because he's not content with his own life. He's struggling with finding himself and a theme by which to drive the film. The most harrowing of these issues; women. The lead character has trouble with all types of women; his mother, his wife, and his several mistresses. These relationships are drawn out from different points of the director's life, giving them each a different perspective and meaning.

Fellini captures beautifully the frustration of creating art. In addition, this film proves indeed that filmmaking is an art form as much as any other. Made in 1963, this film carries an awesome significance today.

It's clear to decide after watching 8 1/2 that "Charlie's Angels" (the movie) director McG possesses no talent. It separates the truly genius directors of our time from the absolutely rubbish ones.

The ratings boards have spoken by giving 8 1/2, 5 stars and perfect scores all around. I'd give it a perfect grade, my highest rating to date for any movie made.

[The Aviator]*

After watching this biopic about Howard Hughes directed by Martin Scorsese, I know that Martin Scorsese must have shed a thousand tears when he did not win. This is a great film, definitely worth watching. There is serious directorial magic happening in this film. I actually believed Leonardo DiCaprio was older than 30, just barely though.

What can you say? Howard Hughes had a bigger-than-life existence in his glory days and Scorsese would be the only logical choice to capture it onto film. The score added very much to the flow of everything, in addition to excellent performances by musicians such as Rufus Wainwright. 5 out of 5.

Now, I need to speak with the man behind the film and give him a few pointers on how, I, a complete amateur and out of leaguer thinks Martin Scorsese can win an Oscar.

Dear Mr. Scorsese,

If you're reading, here's what I think. Don't go for the elaborate production design. This movie deserved to get an award for best director, but Million Dollar Baby deserved it more. Well, that's complicated, and it isn't. Dark elements, underdogs, and death were what resulted in MDB's award. And, well personally, I was rooting for it and still think it was the right choice by the Academy. But, let's say on a year that MDB isn't made, I bet you still would not have won the Oscar.

The thing is Mr. Scorsese, your dedication to the replication of history and your hyper attention to detail is holding you back. You're so damn good at transporting your audiences into an era that they forget to pay attention to everything else that you've done well. They see the 40s, they see the glam, the lights, the planes, the wonderful cinematography and they think, "oh, well ... this is just too Hollywood." Right right, I see the irony there too. But, this is exactly the crowd you have to please.

Marty, you're amazing at working with actors, we all know that. You've made big time ballers out of DeNiro, Pesci, Bracco, and now Leo. Your films always entertain the hell out of all who watch them. You're perfection. The trouble is people forget the effort it takes for a director to do what you do so easily. Since it comes so easy to you, they feel you shouldn't be awarded. And your editor takes the cake. They don't know that you've already mapped the entire film out in your mind before any inch of film hits the cutting room floor. How does that even happen? It's totally ridiculous.

Marty, baby, you're lovely. You should have been given an Oscar for Goodfellas & Taxi Driver and a Sundance Jury Prize for Mean Streets.

So, to summarize, my advice is to make a really low-budget film, cast an emerging actress as the lead, and let the characters do all the work, and don't worry about replicating the period. Make a movie that takes place in the present time. We'll see what happens.

My Best Wishes,

DM

[Shaun of the Dead]

King Kong ain't got nothing on SotD. Whatever that means. This movie is funny, it's sarcastic, it's British and the guts and gore are hilarious instead of disgusting.

Shaun of the Dead is a bloody hilarious stab at the comedy-horror genre. It's a great genre because after you've laughed and laughed throughout the movie, you still have an army of monsters to somehow defeat. You know, most drama/action/thrillers try to add comedy to make the film enjoyable.

Shaun of the Dead takes comedy, mixes it up with an end of the freaking world scenario, and takes you for a fun hour and 40 minute ride. No bumps! Seriously, it's awesome. I'd give it a 4 out of 5, if I did that kind of thing.

[Shaolin Soccer]

Kung Fu Hustle, the film brought to America by Miramax is out in theaters now. So we decided to write a review for those who dislike the razz of the multiplex. This review is for those who watch their films at home, 7 months after they've been released in the theaters.

The Godfather of Kung Fu Hustle, Stephen Chow's Shaolin Soccer is unique & comedic. The film's lead, played by Chow himself is dedicated to having everyone use kung fu to better their lives. It's quite a great principle and makes for some eyebrow twitching, but not so relevant, acrobatic martial arts.

The film could have been better executed, so don't prepare to laugh out loud for the entire duration of the flick. Nor should you be looking forward to a Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon type of martial art and wires feast. If grades were given to movies in this section, Shaolin Soccer would get a solid 2.9 stars out of 5.

[Donnie Darko]

Everyone, as you may know if you're visiting this site, wants you to watch Donnie Darko. I did not want to watch Donnie Darko and was not interested in anything it had to offer me. So, I went to the Sci-Fi section of my DVD store and picked up a copy, reluctantly.

2 hours later, my heart was pounding with anxiety and anticipation as to what would happen on the final day. The film takes place progressively as the month of October comes to an end. There are many possible theories as to what happened at the end and why it happened, and that's why this movie is fun to watch.

Because when it's all said and done, if it has you thinking and talking, it's done the job, and done it well.

[Rushmore]

Wes Anderson's second film is about a high school wannabe nerd who has more ambition than Donald Trump. He's a wannabe nerd because his aspirations of going to an Ivy League college are bleak due to his lack of good grades. The twerp's too busy directing plays and heading up approximately 24 clubs and organizations. Studying is not his strong suit, nor is intelligence. He's simply driven to be successful.

Just when you think that his distractions could not loom any larger, he falls in love with an older woman. Bill Murray plays a tycoon who befriends the young twerp. The plays he puts on are amazing and it makes for great eye candy.

Funny movie, but can be highly annoying - mostly due to the bratty lead character.

[Bottle Rocket]

The Wilson brothers, Luke & Owen were put on the map with this Wes Anderson feature film debut. This film has gained quite a lot of notoriety as being very unique in plot and highly clever in comedic delivery.

The performances all around are hilarious, especially by the actress who plays the role of Ines.

And of course, Bottle Rocket is Kumar Pallana's debut onto the American big screen. Mr. Pallana is seen in other Wes Anderson features, such as Rushmore & The Royal Tenenbaums. His comedy and juggling skills were also captured beautifully in Steven Spielberg's "The Terminal."

But besides Pallana, a surprisingly excellent & hilarious performance by James Caan is just one of the additional treats you're in for.

[The Big Lebowski]

The Big Lebowski has a tremendous cult following. After watching the film, it's understandable why this cult mostly consists of filmmakers and stoners. Colorful and innovative direction, along with elaborate dream sequences and a damn good plot are what this movie consists of.

The most enjoyable aspect of the film is "The Dude" Lebowski who is the relaxed lead character that is put through a series of life altering conundrums one on top of another. If I write some of the events, I'd be giving away information. But realize that this is one of the funniest films ever made.

[Sin City]

Marv, played by Micky Rourke, in this stylized, violent, action, noir thriller, appears to the left. Sin City is a ride for all to enjoy. All except children, of course, who should be left out!

The best part of the film, according to me, is the storyline. But other experts seem very keen on the comic book page turning like cinematography and graphics that Rodriguez has created. Frank Miller's books are all very signature and his work has been praised by many as some of the best work of contemporary times. So, it easily makes for an entertaining movie.

The cool graphics and cinematography didn't really wow me. But, the story holds everything in place and keeps your interest until the very end, where more than likely, you'll be asking for more.

People, such as myself, your humble reviewer, were hoping that the new Batman film would be based on the one book done for the DC hero by Frank Miller. But, it appears that this is not the case, although the Batmobile in the film does look very much like the one Miller drew.

Sin City has everything in it to entertain you, but I felt cheated when the music from the trailers didn't appear in the actual film. A problem that occurs way too often and can easily be avoided.

[Tokyo Godfathers]

Three homeless people encounter an abandoned child on a snowy Christmas Eve in Tokyo. The trio is hilarious together and you'll often forget you're watching cartoons. The three are a homeless drunk, a runaway tween, and a gay queen who is ecstatic that his dream to be the mother of a beautiful daughter has finally come true.

A while back I was encouraged by a friend to watch AKIRA, a cult classic anime film made in the 1980's. Though, the futuristic layouts and impressive animation left my jaw in a dropped state for quite a while, I felt like ripping my eyes out towards the end of the film. There were just one too many plotlines unresolved and the film became absurd and boring. But, the Tokyo Godfathers is not like that.

It captures American sarcasm, or what I perceive to be American sarcasm and comfortable animation, without ever going over the top. When watching the Tokyo Godfathers, you'll never cringe at any moment. It is hilarious, the characters are well-developed, and the length is perfect.

[Autumn Spring]

The gangsta-retirees call this flick the Grand Master of About Schmidt. The film zooms in on the life of a Polish senior couple, preparing for their deaths. The wife is endlessly preparing for their funerals, while the husband is out having adventures, pretending that he has a fortune to be generous with.

There were two major themes in this film, friendship, which is played out between the main character; Fanda, and his accomplice in mischief, Ed. The other theme is the morbid yet unavoidable; death and how humans approach it.

The film is thought provoking and scary but at times, also yawn inducing.

[Bon Voyage]

Bon Voyage is a sarcastic thriller. This French film is hands-down the funniest movie ever made with the setting of Hitler's era. Because it takes place in France, it is easy to laugh at so much of the witty, well-written and well performed humor.

The studios and set design of Bon Voyage rivals any one of Hitchcock's immaculate sets. Unless you know French, the movie is difficult to watch without the subtitles. But even if you're in bed and reading this film, chances are, you'll bolt up and pay attention.

The laughs come in places you would least expect them, after a man is punched in the stomach from a spy, still catching his breath, he is called by his over-protective yet beloved mother. Brilliant stuff. The comedy does not take away from the drama. Bon Voyage is a satirical masterpiece with beautiful cinematography.

[Closer]

Closer has a tendency to make you blush, no matter who you watch the film with. It has enough innuendo to make Ron Jeremy cover his ears and get red in the face. Do not watch this with film with children.

The dialogue is simple and poorly executed. Julia Roberts gives one of her worst performances ever. How Natalie Portman received a nomination for best supporting actress is beyond me. She is simply plausible in the role, if that.

Jude Law and Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels star; Clive Owen, are equally pathetic in their roles. Maybe it was the mood of the entire film, but I saw no real point to it. There was supposedly some information revealed at the end that was supposed to wow me and cause my heart rate to exceed, but I merely was just left confused.

Closer is by no means a good film. It is a poor attempt at what We Don't Live Here Anymore portrayed quite successfully in the newfangled quadrangle love story genre.

[Waking Life]

The first Richard Linklater film I watched was Before Sunrise, starring Ethan Hawke. The plot of that movie was very simple and the rest of it consisted of simple conversations about life, as seen between two lovers.

Waking Life consists of a series of philosophical battles that take place in an animated reality. The film was shot entirely on Mini-DV and then edited into a live action feature, before a large team of animators took to creating, to me, a film that is worthy of the title "cinematic art."

Waking Life goes in-depth with philosophical debates on the meaning of life, there are Q&A sessions regarding dreams that take place within the REM cycle itself and also touches of incidents and human nature that are explored via a cycle of dreams. The film is delicious and the Special Features on the DVD give enough creative fodder to feed an army of Tisch undergrads.

[Millions]

Danny Boyle, the creator of Millions must love saints and sainthood. This movie is filled with references and facts about the life and deaths of saints and the miracles they worked. Saints often appear to the main character of the film, the boy pictured on the left. While it's definitely a morally charged film, Millions does not shove anything down your throat ... for the most part.

Damian, a grade schooler in Ireland or England, is a pure hearted philanthropist. He happens to find a bag of money which he intends to use to save the world with. While some will 'aww' at the cuteness, freckles, and childish voice, others will quickly realize that he represents good. Damian's nemesis, evil, is represented by most of the other cast members who play the role of a very frightening and greedy world.

A touch of outer-worldliness along with the collection of cool effects & shots makes this movie better than average. The music is soothing, as well.

[The Spanish Prisoner]

Call it Irish intuition, call it the luck of the Irish, call it a blue moon, call it a coincidence. I happened to watch The Spanish Prisoner, today, of all days, on St. Patrick's Day. The denoument of the film happens on the very same day!

The movie is very poorly acted and written by David Mamet. All of Mamet's movies have a stage-type of feeling to them even though they're supposed to take place in major cities around the world. Since he mainly writes for the character, all of the settings become very cozy with the actors. And that's why you need brilliant actors like Al Pacino & Jack Lemmon (read: Glengarry Glenn Ross) to breathe life into pages of snappy dialogue.

Unfortunately Mamet cannot make all his screenplays with the budget to bring in a super-talented crowd. The Spanish prisoner brings in an all C- list of thespians. The entire cast is awful. The only mildly engaging thing about the movie is the plot, and even that is majorly predictable. There was a critic who wrote: "if you liked The Usual Suspects, you'll like this." That's like saying, if you liked "The Godfather," you'll like "The Last Don." I'd stick with not renting this 1997 dud and watching The Usual Suspects 30 times over.

[Hellboy]

If I said Hellboy was the best comic book movie ever made, I'd be 96% right.

The right amount of time was taken for everything in this film to develop. Guillermo Del Toro is surprsingly also the director of my all-time most hated movie, Blade 2.

But, Del Toro has done everything right by Hellboy, even though, it is important to mention again how badly he sucked it up with Blade 2. I mean Wesley Snipes was practicing Monday Night wrestling moves on vampires and the graphics were just god-awful.

One aspect that sticks out about Hellboy that no other comic book movie has has been able to capture quite so well is the back-story. The origins of Hellboy are explained within the first 20 or so minutes of the film. The very first frame of the film takes place in Nazi Germany where one of Hitler's most evil assassins is trying to invite more evil to Earth.

That leads to the second best part about Hellboy. It makes sense for a villain so great and purely evil to emerge out of history's most gruesome carnage; the Holocaust.

You feel attached to Hellboy even if it's the first time you've seen the Red Monkey. Some additional fight scenes could have been deleted, but Hellboy still remains one of the best superhero movies ever made.

[The Hound of the Baskervilles]

This 2002 version of the Arthur Conan Doyle classic fell under my eyes at precisely the right time. The Believer magazine has done a post-mortem interview with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in its latest issue through the use of a psychic medium.

As you may or may not know, Hound is immersed in the immortal world. There are seances, legendary tales of mythical creatures, escaped convicts, a moor and of course murders. This film captures a definite horror aspect along with the suspense. In addition, the dialogue is chock full of English idioms that will arm you properly for your next tea party in Trafalgar Square.

The script makes Sherlock Holmes & Dr. Watson a team as opposed to a leader and a chump sidekick. Some of the special effects are lacking and due to it, we are forced to see graphical representations of a countryside or rain, but still the BBC has done a fantastic job with the depiction of this often-told story.

[Trade Offs]

This independent feature was shot in San Diego, CA by a bunch of folks who had the right idea but didn't execute too well on that idea. Making the movie you want is extremely difficult when your resources are limited. To overcome that problem many filmmakers choose to make short films. And even then, their artistic vision gets blurred due to the fact that they don't have one major thing; money.

The lead character in the film, Manu, is a penniless immigrant, and his genie's lamp is the stock market. Due to the bad acting, I felt like fast forwarding through a lot of this movie.

The main problem with the film was the lack of chemistry and the extremely poor acting all around, with one exception. Deypika Singh came out as the sole saving grace for "Trade Offs." She somehow managed to find a wonderful rhythm in this otherwise cacophonous disaster.

[Scotland, PA]

Macbeth was my favorite Shakesperean play in high school and that may partly be the reason I enjoyed Scotland, PA.

The film is based on the famous tragedy and in this version, it takes place in the empire of fast food where a crazy young couple; the McBeths, conspire against a jester of a "King" Duncan.

Set in the 1970s with wild shirts and bad rock n' roll, the film boasts a kickass cast, including Christopher Walken in the role of Lieutenant Macduff.

The movie perfects the art of comic relief with hilarious quips and tiny unspoken visual & social jokes, including the 3 hippies that replace the 3 witches. The feel of the movie is very "independent" in nature, it is the anti-thesis of a James Cameron or Martin Scorsese blockbuster.

If you enjoy laughing and have read the play (even if it was in high school), you'll like this movie. If weeping like a schoolgirl is more your taste and you have not read Macbeth, chances are you'll still enjoy the film, but not nearly as much.

[Hotel Rwanda]*

I watched this film quite a while ago but did not feel to write a review for it. The reason is simple, this movie should have been a documentary and not a film to begin with. Yes, it raises awareness of the tyranny and genocide in Rwanda, but that's not doing the situation any justice.

I think Don Cheadle has been neglected in his acting skills for a long while. It's too bad Hollywood does not recognize comedy as an art form, otherwise Cheadle would have won an award for his performance in Ocean's 11.

Hotel Rwanda is painful to watch due to the real horror that takes place. It's directed perfectly and everyone in the film is wonderful, but I would not recommend this as a movie to watch if you're looking to be entertained.

But, with that said, I think I also may be not realizing the difficulty of the task itself - the task of reenacting the occurences of the civil war in Rwanda with accuracy. My guest who is originally from Africa commented on the film being very genuine in its portrayal of the life there and everything that goes along with it; including the street fare, music, and day-to-day business.

[Finding Neverland]*

Exquisite, magical, poignant, sweet, innocent, and wonderful.

Johnny Depp is great. The children are magnificent. With mild strokes of opulence, this movie has a wealth of eye candy, both in nature and in imagination.

Take your children, take your loved ones, take yourself. Watch the film, it's a good one.

The punch it delivers could be a bit more powerful. The amazing sequences could last a while longer. In the end, I felt for the characters, but something of me was very detached the entire time.

A wonderful job all around. Music was decent, but I would not purchase the soundtrack.

[Swimming Pool]

Another movie I hadn't known of being European in origin, but also, another treat. (That comment relates to the review of Danny Deckchair, which is exactly below this one.)

The first clue of its European and English nature was the British accent, the second was the picturesque French countryside that the film takes place in. The third was the amount of wine consumed. The fourth was the terrible rave music that one of the characters danced to. The fifth was the style of dancing these people did. The sixth and final clue-in to the fact that this movie was created outside of America was the abundance of subtitles and the use of the romance language; French.

The soundtrack of this movie is enough to inspire another great screenplay all on its own. The rest of the movie is wonderfully paced. Most of it goes without incident, but the direction and outstanding acting allows us to see the hearts & minds of the characters. At times, you have to really stretch your imagination to believe what's going on, but I think that was the filmmaker's intention.

An excellent late night flick that has everything to make one's mind wander.

[Danny Deckchair]

With a noble and innocent romance at the center of it, Danny Deckchair feels like a good American comedy. But, it's actually British!

That's the first thing that struck me about this inventive film; even though English because it takes place in England, every part of it feels American. Even the title character's job is something considered very blue collared American; he's a construction worker.

After a bit of thinking, I came up with the following reasoning: the people who made the film very badly wanted to have Jim Carrey or Mike Myers as their lead actor, but didn't have the money to pay them. So, they figured, let the script do all the work and let our actors be no-namers. And I'm glad they did it.

This movie is extremely hilarious, so-so on the love aspect of it, and definitely something different. It's family friendly too, except for the bit of cursing that goes on.

[The Maltese Falcon]

Humphrey Bogart helped define an entire generation of actors, worldwide. His style is something that lends itself to be emulated and envied. Like other movies of the 40s, The Maltese Falcon has a very distinct flavor to it. The main attraction, Mr. Bogart, is portrayed larger than life; he's smarter, quicker, and more courageous than the average man and he's not modest about it either.

You realize that when Humphrey Bogart enters the set, everyone else has to take a step back, and those who try to fight his over-the-top machismo on screen will no doubt get trampled. Even the most amateur of film watchers will notice how Mr. Bogart does not really pay attention to the actor opposite him, he merely concentrates on delivering his lines with a ferocious punch. This is what makes the film entertaining. Bogart can handle himself as the suave King Kong in the movie and everyone else just sort of enjoys the ride that he takes them on. The non-responsiveness to another actor's lines, being over-the-top, being overly masculine are not what good actors are taught to do; but these characteristics are definitely next to the word 'star' in the dictionary, and possibly also next to the word 'big shot' in a colloquial dictionary of sorts.

When modern-day actors (read: Brad Pitt in "Troy", Colin Farrell in any movie, Tom Cruise in "The Last Samurai") try to be smooth, it comes off as cheesy and embarrassing. When Bogart does it in any film, especially The Maltese Falcon, it becomes addictive.

Bogart is the definition of a classic Hollywood hero in this film. He has enough charm and wit to make women want him and men want to be him.

Right, yeah, this movie is highly recommended.

[Mean Creek]

"Mean Creek" is too euphemistic of a title for the actual occurrences of this film. Cheesy movie critics may describe this film as a modern-day "Lord of the Flies," except on this creek, there is one girl present.

I'd describe it as a one-of-a-kind movie with excellent acting, realistic visuals and a musical score that blends in perfectly with each frame. Mean Creek is an excellent film and deepens our understanding of ethics through children's eyes.

[Ray]*

Ray is not an independent film in the way "Transit" is; its budget is much larger than $650. In fact, the Academy Award nominated film was made for approximately $30 million. But, director Taylor Hackford and actor Jamie Foxx have taken a movie that was originally marked for the home theater market and turned it into a bona fide box office hit.

The use of color is vivid in Ray and it tells the story of Mr. Charles as he faces stardom and everything that comes along with it. A powerful drama with great music by Ray himself, this is a movie in which everyone will derive something different out of.

Ray is a good movie, but it is not Oscar-worthy. There are little to no flaws in the movie, but it just does not reach any intense bars of emotion, nor does it do anything drastically different.

[The United States of Leland]

USL is uncomfortable from its very first frame. The film runs in a linear format, with several flashback sequences of many of the well-written characters. Uncomfortable because it questions the concept of good and evil through various acts of both.

The film is essentially about human nature and the purpose of existence. Though, a very difficult set of questions to answer, USL makes you think, but mostly it makes you cry. Do not ever let a child under the age of 17 watch this film. With the exception of the mild violence and drug abuse, it's not really gratuitous. I'm just afraid that if a child or an undeveloped mind watches this film, they'll have a miserable day afterwards and much difficulty coping with the world for at least a good week.

Though the message of the movie is positive, there is a gritty sense of realism portrayed, which in turn backfires on this good intention.

[Zatoichi: The Blind Swordsman]

Zatoichi: The Blind Swordsman is a smooth operator. The theme of revenge is at the center of this remake of a Japanese classic. The fight moves are extremely original. Like many of its music sequences, the style of Zatoichi is a combination of traditional and progressive. The Director of Photography and a couple of others involved in the film talk about their experience on set in the DVD Special Features section. This gives you more in depth information on how Zatoichi's achieved its unique and captivating scenes.

A pleasure to watch, Zatoichi's a carefully knit tale of vengeance, honor, humor, and the philosophies of life.

It has won several awards at film festivals and done well at the box office in Asia. Now Zatoichi can entertain you on a weeknight.

[Million Dollar Baby]*

Not always a fan of Clint Eastwood films, I hesitantly entered one of the few theaters in New York City that was playing Million Dollar Baby, still in limited release. Eastwood's voice carries with it a deep emotion that none can imagine emulating. The movie is based on F.X. Toole's short story Rope Burns.

Boxing is a struggle and not always a sport that is universally liked due to all violence involved. The film's portrayal of the boxing gym, thanks to the brilliant direction of Mr. Eastwood, is somewhat like that of a theater with perpetual rehearsals. They are the relationships that develop between Morgan Freeman, Eastwood, and Hilary Swank that give the film its heart.

Even though I watched the film on a Monday night, with a scattered audience of about 10 people in 750 seat capacity theater, there were claps and gasps and audible sniffles as we watched. Done with a very modest budget, it is directed very well with great use of light, as it is seen through the dark.

A round of emotions are at the center of Million Dollar Baby and ultimately, the brilliant performances, with an award-worthy acting performance by Clint Eastwood, makes Million Dollar Baby one of my favorite movies of all time.

[Spartan]

David Mamet has written some of the best roles for men; bar none, for film & stage. Ask an aspiring actor what his monologue is, and chances are Mamet will have written them. Spartan does the same, in which Val Kilmer's character is a man who is a "doer" more than a thinker, but that changes when faced with grave circumstances. It is here, at this critical point in the character's life where he decides and realizes things he never knew about himself. And he becomes something of a hero.

Mamet's screenplay is wonderfully written, although poor critics along with very little marketing saw Spartan as being a failure at the box office. Released now on DVD, with exclusive commentary from Val Kilmer, Spartan is a good action thriller with a soul at its center. Kilmer's grasp on his character is not very strong, so you may see some monotone moments in his otherwise commendable performance.

Spartan's cool. Don't believe the C ratings on Yahoo! Movies.

[The Station Agent]

Ever been on a long journey on a train? I took one to Florida once from Grand Central, with my grandparents. It was quite a trek due to the 6-hour-delay. It was very enjoyable, ample legroom, a dining car which served pizza, TV monitors playing blockbuster movies, and finally the destination; Disney World.

Watching The Station Agent is very much like an enjoyable train ride. You are introduced to 3 different strangers; who grow closer together. As the film progresses, one can sense the comfort you get from strangers. But, there's also a sense of distrust that is inherent when meeting new people who pry a little too much into your insecurities.

Shot beautifully in New Jersey, the movie is very well made and even the deleted scenes looked like they deserved to be in the final cut. A subtle metaphor for a meaningful journey it showcases the railroad and everything that comes with it.

[Noi]

While the cover suggested an intense and meaningful film "like Donnie Darko," Nói felt more like a silent that would have been better in black and white. Though well done, its hollow attempt at a profound message failed simply because of its lack of dialogue and inadequate plot development. While the visuals were impressive, and the characters, charming, Nói left me with rolling credits thinking, "did I miss something?" Although Nói won over 15 international prizes, I felt it was a delightful journey following a boy in Iceland, but nothing more. With all of that said, Nói was worth my 90 minutes, and geniusly filmed, but fell far short of my expectations for an insightful motion picture. -Marilana Rufo

[Super Size Me]

Marketed as a movie of "epic proportions," Super Size Me is a decent documentary. Layered with several interviews with doctors, lawyers, and nutritionists, the documentary takes a deep look at the world of fat and how McDonald's rules it. It does not preach to the viewer what s/he should or should not eat, but it ends up suggesting moderation & exercise.

What it does reveal, however, are the similarities between the world of tobacco manufacturers and the world of fast food restaurants; mainly their relationship with product placement in relationship with children.

Not very entertaining, I found myself fast forwarding through some of the repetitive sequences in the film and turning away at some grotesque moments. I commend it for bringing the world of fat into perspective and revealing some interesting fatty tidbits.

[Harold and Maude]

The Grand Theft Auto series of video games should be remodeled and made to fit the content of Harold and Maude. This way, not only will players get to indulge in their wishes to steal automobiles, bikes, and trucks, but in addition, they will also discover the meaning of life through a close look at death.

Yes, the 1979 film is being reviewed today 26 years too late, but that's just the kind of practice the brilliantly written script suggests. Displaying more mock suicides and disorderly conduct than any recent film I've seen, Harold & Maude, at its heart is a purely genius comedy. Many will claim it to be spiritual in nature, and indulgent in a thick dose of philosophy. It has this too. But, mainly, Harold and Maude will make you laugh, until you will find nothing too shocking.

A great comedy worth watching multiple times. Since its a movie made in the decade of platform shoes, disco balls, and the white horse, H&M gets away with murder with a GP (what we now know as PG) rating. Good thing Janet Jackson was still in diapers (or was she?) at that age. Otherwise, the MPAA surely would have rated this film "R" or Restricted Due to Adult Content. Watch it today. Now. Seriously, go rent this.

[Lemony Snicket's: A Series of Unfortunate Events]

"It's like another Harry Potter franchise." "Do you think this movie will have sequels like Harry Potter?" "I hear this movie is based on a children's book, like Harry Potter."

Yes. Most likely, Yes. and Yes.

But, one thing that Lemony Snicket's has that Harry Potter has missed in all of its movies; great acting. Jim Carrey's performance is spectacular and not over the top as earlier written. His part is played exactly as one would picture the Count. Intense, undeniably evil, and a bit senile from surrounding himself in the atmosphere that he has.

The series of Unfortunate Events makes use of several special CG effects, which usually make me cringe, but instead they are used in a way that adds a touch of pop-up book fairy tales rather than futuristic holograms. The tone of the film is dark and the content is not suitable for children who are under the age of 7. That explains why I laughed through many of the sequences while the pair of 7 kids two rows ahead of me remained absolutely silent.

All of the children, including the baby, which was in one or two scenes also computer generated, did a great job of acting. The children are placed in dire situations with a dark undertone; unlike Looney Tunes & Home Alone where characters are put in a fatal spot with a light and upbeat mood.

[Sideways]*

It turns out wine connosieurs, alcoholics, nymphomaniacs, voiceover actors, and people with low self-esteems make a pretty damn good movie.

With all the problems faced by the lead characters in Sideways, one does not leave loving any of them. Each of them have flaws that grossly humanize them and make them, for the most part, unlikable. In a scene, the lead character, played by Paul Giamatti, an unpublished author, and professional wine taster, is comparing the superiority of Pinot over most wines with a love that develops over time. If this scene was the only one in the movie, I still would have loved it. Though, many of the people would have been angered at paying $10.50 for a 5-minute-scene.

So, director & co-screenwriter Alexander Payne, keeping the viewing audience in mind gave us a bottle full of explosive real life drama. We are given a free tour of the beautiful Northern California wine country, by way of debaucherous acts of promiscuity and a bit of self-exploration. Payne shows us a slow montage as a foursome gathers for an evening of food and wine. We see four people with different agendas slowly dwindling into the captivity of a wine generated buzz and then proceed to act out their wishes.

Sideways is one of the best movies of 2004 and whoever made the trailers for the film really didn't understand the themes of the film clearly. If it weren't for a friend who has horrible taste in movies telling me not to go watch Sideways, I would have never had the great pleasure of being thoroughly entertained by it.

[Huff]

Premiering Sunday with a good deal of marketing hype behind it, is Showtime's new series, "Huff." Starring Hank Azaria as psychiatrist, Dr. Craig "Huff" Huffstodt, who deals with death, family, and desire. Although, no Tony Soprano, and certainly no Dr. Jennifer Melfi, Huff is at best watchable.

The show's intro is something reminiscent of Six Feet Under's, but I will stop trying to compare Huff with any show on HBO, however difficult that may be considering it begs to be aired on the more popular subscription cable channel.

It's refreshing seeing Hank Azaria utilizing his acting skills as opposed to his ability to mimic and speak with any accent known to exist. He does a fine job of portraying an accomplished individual who is suffering from a mid-life crisis. Although it may sound like an easy task, any actor will let you know otherwise.

The other great part about the show is Izzy, Blythe Danner, who plays, what else but Huff's mother. Since I promised earlier, I will not mention which other show was highly addictive due to a strong personality in the lead character's mother. Izzy's constant bickering, and anger inducing poisonous drops of truth give the word bitter a completely new meaning.

The rest of the cast is pretty delightful and Huff is one of those shows you'll like to watch if it's on, but won't really want to TIVO.

[Maria Full Of Grace]

As a film lover, I would have to say that this movie is paced perfectly. It's not your average drug movie. The plot develops perfectly and goes in-depth to explore Maria and Blanca's desperation, as we see their physical journey from Colombia to New York.

Each character in the movie is fully developed. There is an actual sense of change felt through the very real acting. It's nice that the movie does not depend on dialogue to move the story along, but the actors move it along by knowing their characters inside and out.

The movie showcases "mules;" people that store pellets of heroin inside their bodies. I do not recall watching any other movie before that has captured the objectivity of a "mule." The painful and miserable process is just seen as a way to subsist or move up in the world. It humanizes drug traffickers and their indentured servant type role in the drug trade. Maria Full of Grace is one of the best movies of 2004.

[I Heart Huckabees]

If you enjoy brainy, logical, seemingly endless, and immensely engaging conversations or arguments about life, existentialism, and current events, you will enjoy this movie.

The cast does a masterful job of interpreting the brilliant script and being absolutely hilarious.

Some moments that lose their edge only exist because they are not carried out well by the actor (read: Marky Mark). But, even he has done a pretty damn good job in this film. Even if you hold tremendous non-heart like affection towards this clown, you will enjoy the movie. Dustin Hoffman is downright silly.

It's a great watch if you like to laugh, if you can follow quick-witted exchanges, and understand to some degree the concepts of post-modernism and existentialism.

[Re:Directing & Tim Burton]

Great performances have two main sources:

1. the actor
2. the director

Big Fish is filled with extremely talented actors playing roles that may or may not be similar to the ones they have tackled in the past. But, all of the performances in Big Fish are excellent. Performances from all actors in Tim Burton movies are great.

Is this a coincidence? No. A great director knows the strengths and weaknesses of his actors. Quentin Tarantino is a great director because of this unique talent. He showcased John Travolta in the best performance of his life. You take a look at Swordfish and Battlestar Galactica (or whatever it is called) and you realize, "man, Tarantino knew just what lines to feed this assclown; he knew how to draw a good performance from him."

Other directors could not. What does this mean? Travolta sucks, but Tarantino is great.

In a very similar way, Burton is capable of getting the best performances from his actors. He knows how to direct a scene so that it is absolute bliss to the viewer. He knows what will work and what will not, which is why he has consistently made films that people have enjoyed.

You can argue all day about how great a movie was or wasn't, putting crazy numbers and ratings, but in the end, the interpretation of a movie is very personal just like anything else you respect.

[Peanut Butter & Co.] a satisfying & indulgent bite

If you have ever been to the West Village, you know that all the world's food is available within walking distance. And now a classic American staple has created its own niche in the international mix. Peanut Butter & Co. (240 Sullivan St.) is just quirky enough to be sane. With six different types of peanut butters, including a spicy variety, this small restaurant finds a great way to reinvent a classic in the heart of Greenwich Village.

Being a sucker for breakfast spreads, I went for the Cookie Dough Surprise (Cream Cheese, Peanut Butter, & Chocolate Chips) served on white. The meal arrived with a welcoming side of salty potato chips and carrots.

Upon first bite, my tastebuds were on high alert, the vanilla cream cheese was sweet, the peanut butter's texture was a smooth mesh; not sweet and not salty, and with the chocolate chips, this sandwich consistently delivered a very indulgent and satisfying bite. Be sure to have something cold to chug alongside your sandwich; a glass of cold milk kept me good company throughout this filling meal.

My guest ordered an "Elvis" without bacon; a combo of toast, peanut butter & bananas, glazed with honey.
Peanut Butter & Co. is satisfying, creative in its menu choices and gives a delicious protein filled chomp.

[The Motorcycle Diaries]

If you enjoy a movie with great visuals, a tangible and hair-raising story, and good acting, you will enjoy this film.

I was under the impression that this movie was creative non-fiction, but am told that it is based on the diaries of Ché, which makes it even better.

This type of film was started with Star Wars: Episode 1, in which you get to see the story behind the person.

Obviously no Darth Vader, Che's journey through South America shows us why a revolution was necessary in his eyes and the way the movie ends makes even non-believers of the Cuban revolution feel a connection with Che.

All parts are brilliantly acted, it's written well, and beautifully edited. Truly a wonderful experience.

[Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter ... And Spring]

It takes a very powerful movie to keep your attention without having much dialogue or violence. Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring uses its beautiful setting to tell a story of the arduous path to liberation.

Not many films tackle this topic to begin with so watching that aspect alone is wonderful.